Barr Undercuts Mueller: Inside Mueller’s Blockbuster Testimony | The Beat With Ari Melber | MSNBC


>>>FORMER SPECIAL COUNSEL BOB>>>FORMER SPECIAL COUNSEL BOB MUELLER WILL TESTIFY PUBLICLY MUELLER WILL TESTIFY PUBLICLY BEFORE CONGRESS NEXT WEEK. BEFORE CONGRESS NEXT WEEK. TODAY ATTORNEY GENERAL BILL BARR TODAY ATTORNEY GENERAL BILL BARR REEMERGED TO UNDERCUT THAT REEMERGED TO UNDERCUT THAT LOOMING HEARING. LOOMING HEARING.>>I DON’T KNOW IF I’LL BE>>I DON’T KNOW IF I’LL BE WATCHING IN REAL TIME, BUT I’M WATCHING IN REAL TIME, BUT I’M SURE WHAT HE SAYS WILL GET TO ME SURE WHAT HE SAYS WILL GET TO ME SOMEHOW. SOMEHOW. I SAID ALL ALONG THAT I HAD — I I SAID ALL ALONG THAT I HAD — I WOULD NOT OBJECT TO BOB GOING UP WOULD NOT OBJECT TO BOB GOING UP TO TESTIFY, BUT AFTER I SAID TO TESTIFY, BUT AFTER I SAID THAT, HE INDICATED HE WAS NOT THAT, HE INDICATED HE WAS NOT INTERESTED IN TESTIFYING. INTERESTED IN TESTIFYING. SO I WAS DISAPPOINTED TO SEE HIM SO I WAS DISAPPOINTED TO SEE HIM SUBPOENAED BECAUSE I DON’T THINK SUBPOENAED BECAUSE I DON’T THINK THAT SERVES ANY PURPOSE, THAT SERVES ANY PURPOSE, DRAGGING BOB MUELLER UP IF HE, DRAGGING BOB MUELLER UP IF HE, IN FACT, IS GOING TO STICK TO IN FACT, IS GOING TO STICK TO THE REPORT. THE REPORT. IT SEEMS TO ME THE ONLY REASON IT SEEMS TO ME THE ONLY REASON FOR DOING THAT IS TO CREATE SOME FOR DOING THAT IS TO CREATE SOME KIND OF PUBLIC SPECTACLE. KIND OF PUBLIC SPECTACLE. AND IF BOB DECIDES THAT HE AND IF BOB DECIDES THAT HE DOESN’T WANT TO BE SUBJECT TO DOESN’T WANT TO BE SUBJECT TO THAT, THEN THE DEPARTMENT OF THAT, THEN THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE WOULD CERTAINLY BACK JUSTICE WOULD CERTAINLY BACK HIM. HIM.>>THAT IS WHAT SHADE LOOKS LIKE>>THAT IS WHAT SHADE LOOKS LIKE BETWEEN A SUPERVISOR AND HIS OLD>>>MR. PRESIDENT, ON BEHALF OF>>>MR. PRESIDENT, ON BEHALF OF EVERY ONE OF THE EMPLOYEES YOU EVERY ONE OF THE EMPLOYEES YOU SEE HERE BEFORE YOU AND AROUND SEE HERE BEFORE YOU AND AROUND THE WORLD, IT IS MY PRIVILEGE TO THE WORLD, IT IS MY PRIVILEGE TO WELCOME YOU TO THE FBI. WELCOME YOU TO THE FBI. [ CHEERS AND APPLAUSE ] [ CHEERS AND APPLAUSE ]>>WE ARE NOT ABOVE USING THIS>>WE ARE NOT ABOVE USING THIS OCCASION FOR RECRUITING OCCASION FOR RECRUITING PURPOSES. PURPOSES. [ LAUGHTER ] [ LAUGHTER ] BUT YOU ARE A WEE BIT PAST OUR BUT YOU ARE A WEE BIT PAST OUR AGE LIMIT. AGE LIMIT. [ LAUGHTER ] [ LAUGHTER ] HOWEVER, IT IS NOT TOO EARLY FOR HOWEVER, IT IS NOT TOO EARLY FOR SASHA AND MALIA — SASHA AND MALIA — [ LAUGHTER ] [ LAUGHTER ] — TO START THINKING ABOUT — TO START THINKING ABOUT JOINING THE FBI. JOINING THE FBI. AND SO WE WOULD LIKE TO SEND YOU AND SO WE WOULD LIKE TO SEND YOU HOME WITH TWO OFFICIAL BERRO HOME WITH TWO OFFICIAL BERRO TEDDY BEARS FOR THEM AS WELL AS TEDDY BEARS FOR THEM AS WELL AS T-SHIRTS. T-SHIRTS. [ CHEERS AND APPLAUSE ] [ CHEERS AND APPLAUSE ]>>TEDDY BEARS IN THE AIR.>>TEDDY BEARS IN THE AIR. THAT WAS FBI DIRECTOR BOB THAT WAS FBI DIRECTOR BOB MUELLER A DECADE AGO, OF COURSE, MUELLER A DECADE AGO, OF COURSE, SPEAKING THERE WITH THE FIRST SPEAKING THERE WITH THE FIRST FAMILY AND BARACK OBAMA FAMILY AND BARACK OBAMA WELCOMING THE NEW PRESIDENT ON WELCOMING THE NEW PRESIDENT ON WHAT WAS HIS FIRST OFFICIAL WHAT WAS HIS FIRST OFFICIAL VISIT TO THE FBI, AND HANDING VISIT TO THE FBI, AND HANDING THOSE TWO TEDDY BEARS OVER AS THOSE TWO TEDDY BEARS OVER AS GIFTS FOR THE PRESIDENT’S GIFTS FOR THE PRESIDENT’S DAUGHTERS. DAUGHTERS. THAT’S ABOUT AS WARM AND THAT’S ABOUT AS WARM AND UNSCRIPTED AS MUELLER EVER GETS UNSCRIPTED AS MUELLER EVER GETS IN PUBLIC. IN PUBLIC. SMILING, LEANING INTO A SMILING, LEANING INTO A CEREMONIAL EVENT, HONORING THE CEREMONIAL EVENT, HONORING THE PRESIDENT AND THE BUREAU. PRESIDENT AND THE BUREAU. BUT YOU WON’T FIND MUCH FOOTAGE BUT YOU WON’T FIND MUCH FOOTAGE OF MUELLER EVER SHOWING MORE OF MUELLER EVER SHOWING MORE PERSONALITY THAN THAT TWO TEDDY PERSONALITY THAN THAT TWO TEDDY BEAR DAY. BEAR DAY. YOU CAN SCOUR THE ARCHIVES. YOU CAN SCOUR THE ARCHIVES. WE DID. WE DID. THAT’S ABOUT AS FAR AS IT GOES. THAT’S ABOUT AS FAR AS IT GOES. THE REST OF THE TIME, MOST OF THE REST OF THE TIME, MOST OF THE TIME, BOB MUELLER IS MORE THE TIME, BOB MUELLER IS MORE TIGHT LIPPED AND TACITURN. TIGHT LIPPED AND TACITURN. NEXT WEEK HE TESTIFIES ABOUT NEXT WEEK HE TESTIFIES ABOUT CONGRESS ABOUT A PROBE THAT IS CONGRESS ABOUT A PROBE THAT IS THE MOST ANTICIPATED HEARING OF THE MOST ANTICIPATED HEARING OF THE TRUMP ERA. THE TRUMP ERA. ONLY MUELLER KNOWS WHAT HE ONLY MUELLER KNOWS WHAT HE INTENDS TO SAY, BUT RIGHT NOW WE INTENDS TO SAY, BUT RIGHT NOW WE HAVE A SPECIAL REPORT FOR YOU ON HAVE A SPECIAL REPORT FOR YOU ON MUELLER UNDER OATH WITH SOME MUELLER UNDER OATH WITH SOME CLUES ON HIS APPROACH, AND SOME CLUES ON HIS APPROACH, AND SOME REPORTING ON HAI BOB MUELLER REPORTING ON HAI BOB MUELLER TESTIFIES AT HEARINGS. TESTIFIES AT HEARINGS. BECAUSE DESPITE HIS SECRETIVE BECAUSE DESPITE HIS SECRETIVE REPUTATION, MUELLER’S LONG REPUTATION, MUELLER’S LONG CAREER MEANS HE’S TESTIFIED MANY CAREER MEANS HE’S TESTIFIED MANY TIMES. TIMES. IN FACT, YOU SEE RIGHT HERE SOME IN FACT, YOU SEE RIGHT HERE SOME OF THEM. OF THEM. WE SCOURED DECADES OF HIS WE SCOURED DECADES OF HIS HEARINGS, OVER 60 APPEARANCES HEARINGS, OVER 60 APPEARANCES BEFORE CONGRESS FROM HIS SERVICE BEFORE CONGRESS FROM HIS SERVICE AT THE FBI AND D.O.J.. AT THE FBI AND D.O.J.. AND WE STUDIED HOW HE DEALS WITH AND WE STUDIED HOW HE DEALS WITH ASSERTIVE QUESTIONING, HOW HE ASSERTIVE QUESTIONING, HOW HE AVOIDS CERTAIN THINGS WITHIN HIS AVOIDS CERTAIN THINGS WITHIN HIS OBLIGATION ANDS HOW HE LIVES UP OBLIGATION ANDS HOW HE LIVES UP TO A LONG-STANDING REP AS THE TO A LONG-STANDING REP AS THE ULTIMATE RULE FOLLOWER. ULTIMATE RULE FOLLOWER. NOW, WE FOUND MANY SIMILAR NOW, WE FOUND MANY SIMILAR RESPONSES FROM MUELLER GOING RESPONSES FROM MUELLER GOING BACK TO HIS FIRST FBI DIRECTOR BACK TO HIS FIRST FBI DIRECTOR CONFIRMATION HEARING. CONFIRMATION HEARING. THIS WAS 2001, AND HE SPARD WITH THIS WAS 2001, AND HE SPARD WITH WITH A U.S. SENATOR ABOUT A WITH A U.S. SENATOR ABOUT A CONTROVERSIAL MEMO THAT WAS CONTROVERSIAL MEMO THAT WAS RELATED TO A PREVIOUS RELATED TO A PREVIOUS INVESTIGATION. INVESTIGATION.>>THE SHORT ANSWER, SENATOR, IS>>THE SHORT ANSWER, SENATOR, IS YES. YES. AND I THINK — I’M NOT CERTAIN AND I THINK — I’M NOT CERTAIN WHAT I WOULD DO IN THAT WHAT I WOULD DO IN THAT CIRCUMSTANCE, BUT I CANNOT TELL CIRCUMSTANCE, BUT I CANNOT TELL YOU TODAY THAT I ABSOLUTELY YOU TODAY THAT I ABSOLUTELY WOULD. WOULD.>>ARE YOU NOW SAYING,>>ARE YOU NOW SAYING, MR. MUELLER, THAT YOU WOULD, IN MR. MUELLER, THAT YOU WOULD, IN FACT, HAVE TURNED OVER THIS MEMO FACT, HAVE TURNED OVER THIS MEMO OF DECEMBER 9th, 1996, ON YOUR OF DECEMBER 9th, 1996, ON YOUR OWN TO THE SENATE OVERSIGHT OWN TO THE SENATE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE? COMMITTEE?>>I CAN’T SAY WITH>>I CAN’T SAY WITH DEFINITIVENESS NOW AT THIS TIME DEFINITIVENESS NOW AT THIS TIME I WOULD. I WOULD. I CANNOT PUT MYSELF, WITHOUT ALL I CANNOT PUT MYSELF, WITHOUT ALL THE FACTS, BACK INTO THE THE FACTS, BACK INTO THE POSITION OF THE DECISION MAKER. POSITION OF THE DECISION MAKER.>>IF THIS COMMITTEE — IF THOSE>>IF THIS COMMITTEE — IF THOSE TWO MEN, THE CHAIRMAN AND THE TWO MEN, THE CHAIRMAN AND THE RANKING MEMBER, CAN’T HAVE RANKING MEMBER, CAN’T HAVE ACCESS TO THIS MEMORANDUM, I ACCESS TO THIS MEMORANDUM, I DON’T THINK SENATE OVERSIGHT IS DON’T THINK SENATE OVERSIGHT IS WORTH A TINKERS DAM. WORTH A TINKERS DAM.>>I AM MAKING A DISTINCTION,>>I AM MAKING A DISTINCTION, SENATOR, IF I MIGHT. SENATOR, IF I MIGHT. I’M SAYING IN A CASE WHERE THERE I’M SAYING IN A CASE WHERE THERE HAS BEEN A REQUEST FOR THIS HAS BEEN A REQUEST FOR THIS MEMORANDUM, I WOULD EXPECT THAT MEMORANDUM, I WOULD EXPECT THAT THE REQUEST OF THE COMMITTEE TO THE REQUEST OF THE COMMITTEE TO GET THIS MEMORANDUM WOULD BE GET THIS MEMORANDUM WOULD BE ACCOMMODATED. ACCOMMODATED.>>WELL, MR. MUELLER, THAT>>WELL, MR. MUELLER, THAT DOESN’T ANSWER THE QUESTION AT DOESN’T ANSWER THE QUESTION AT ALL. ALL.>>THAT DOESN’T ANSWER THE>>THAT DOESN’T ANSWER THE QUESTION AT ALL, WHICH MAY HAVE QUESTION AT ALL, WHICH MAY HAVE BEEN MUELLER’S GOAL. BEEN MUELLER’S GOAL. OBSERVE THE RULES, TELL THE OBSERVE THE RULES, TELL THE TRUTH, BUT JUST DON’T ANSWER TRUTH, BUT JUST DON’T ANSWER CERTAIN QUESTIONS. CERTAIN QUESTIONS. HE HASN’T CHANGED, NOT EVEN HIS HE HASN’T CHANGED, NOT EVEN HIS OUTFITS. OUTFITS. THE DARK JACKET, THE WHITE THE DARK JACKET, THE WHITE SHIRT, THE RED CHECKERED TIE. SHIRT, THE RED CHECKERED TIE. THAT BRINGS ME TO A CLASSIC BOB THAT BRINGS ME TO A CLASSIC BOB MUELLER RIDDLE TO KEEP IN MIND MUELLER RIDDLE TO KEEP IN MIND FOR NEXT WEEK. FOR NEXT WEEK. WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BOB MUELLER AND A BOTTLE OF BOB MUELLER AND A BOTTLE OF WINE? WINE? WINE CHANGES, MUELLER DOESN’T. WINE CHANGES, MUELLER DOESN’T. WE CHECKED THESE TAPES AND WE CHECKED THESE TAPES AND HERE’S HOW HE SWATS AWAY HERE’S HOW HE SWATS AWAY HYPOTHETICALS AND QUESTIONS HYPOTHETICALS AND QUESTIONS EVERY TIME HE DOESN’T WANT TO EVERY TIME HE DOESN’T WANT TO ANSWER. ANSWER.>>I HESITATE TO SPECULATE>>I HESITATE TO SPECULATE BECAUSE I HAVE JUST A PIECE OF BECAUSE I HAVE JUST A PIECE OF THE PUZZLE ALSO. THE PUZZLE ALSO. I WOULD HAVE TO CHECK TO MAKE I WOULD HAVE TO CHECK TO MAKE ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN. ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN. IN EVERY INVESTIGATION IN EVERY INVESTIGATION PARTICULARLY A FAST-MOVING PARTICULARLY A FAST-MOVING INVESTIGATION, THERE ARE STEPS INVESTIGATION, THERE ARE STEPS TAKEN THAT MAY NOT WORKOUT. TAKEN THAT MAY NOT WORKOUT. IT’S VERY DIFFICULT TO IT’S VERY DIFFICULT TO GENERALIZE OR TO REACH SOME SORT GENERALIZE OR TO REACH SOME SORT OF UNDERSTANDING OR MAKE OF UNDERSTANDING OR MAKE PROGRESS WITH THAT PROGRESS WITH THAT GENERALIZATION. GENERALIZATION.>>THOSE ALL SOUND LIKE>>THOSE ALL SOUND LIKE BASICALLY TRUE STATEMENTS, BUT BASICALLY TRUE STATEMENTS, BUT THEY STOP SHORT OF WHAT THE THEY STOP SHORT OF WHAT THE CONGRESSIONAL QUESTIONERS WANTED CONGRESSIONAL QUESTIONERS WANTED TO KNOW. TO KNOW. THE POINT HERE ISN’T THAT THE POINT HERE ISN’T THAT MUELLER’S PAST HEARING SUGGESTS MUELLER’S PAST HEARING SUGGESTS HE’S TRYING TO ONLY BE EVASIVE HE’S TRYING TO ONLY BE EVASIVE OR PROTECT ANYONE, BUT RATHER OR PROTECT ANYONE, BUT RATHER THAT EVEN WHEN HE’S SITTING ON THAT EVEN WHEN HE’S SITTING ON BLOCK BUSTER EVIDENCE OR BLOCK BUSTER EVIDENCE OR DRAMATIC STORIES WHICH YOU ARE DRAMATIC STORIES WHICH YOU ARE ABOUT TO SEE, HIS STYLE IS ABOUT TO SEE, HIS STYLE IS ALMOST ALWAYS JUST THE FACTS. ALMOST ALWAYS JUST THE FACTS. AND THAT BRINGS ME, AS I AND THAT BRINGS ME, AS I MENTIONED, TO A KEY PART OF THIS MENTIONED, TO A KEY PART OF THIS REPORT TONIGHT ON MUELLER UNDER REPORT TONIGHT ON MUELLER UNDER OATH. OATH. A HUGE LEGAL SCANDAL WHERE YOU A HUGE LEGAL SCANDAL WHERE YOU ACTUALLY CAN GET AN APPLES TO ACTUALLY CAN GET AN APPLES TO APPLES COMPARISON OF HOW BOB APPLES COMPARISON OF HOW BOB MUELLER TESTIFIES ABOUT A MUELLER TESTIFIES ABOUT A COMPARED TO A PEER. COMPARED TO A PEER. CONSIDER A SECRET SCANDAL THAT CONSIDER A SECRET SCANDAL THAT ROCKED THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION ROCKED THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION AND IT BOILED DOWN TO WHAT AND IT BOILED DOWN TO WHAT MUELLER AND ONE OTHER OFFICIAL MUELLER AND ONE OTHER OFFICIAL KNEW ABOUT PRESSURE THAT WAS KNEW ABOUT PRESSURE THAT WAS APPLIED, POTENTIALLY ILLICITLY, APPLIED, POTENTIALLY ILLICITLY, TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL WHILE HE TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL WHILE HE WAS LYING IN HIS HOSPITAL BED WAS LYING IN HIS HOSPITAL BED AND HOW THESE TWO OFFICIALS, AND HOW THESE TWO OFFICIALS, WHO, SPOILER, HAVE BOTH SERVED WHO, SPOILER, HAVE BOTH SERVED AS FBI DIRECTORS, HOW THEY AS FBI DIRECTORS, HOW THEY ULTIMATELY ADDRESSED THIS ULTIMATELY ADDRESSED THIS SCANDAL WHEN LATER QUESTIONED BY SCANDAL WHEN LATER QUESTIONED BY CONGRESS UNDER OATH. CONGRESS UNDER OATH. SO, THIS IS LIKE PERFECT MUELLER SO, THIS IS LIKE PERFECT MUELLER OLOGY. OLOGY. IT AURLLL STARTED WITH A SEEN TH IT AURLLL STARTED WITH A SEEN TH COULD HAVE BEEN OUT OF “BORNE COULD HAVE BEEN OUT OF “BORNE IDENTITY.” IDENTITY.” LYING IN BED THE ATTORNEY LYING IN BED THE ATTORNEY GENERAL JOHN ASH CROFT. GENERAL JOHN ASH CROFT. THEY WANTED HIM TO APPROVE AN THEY WANTED HIM TO APPROVE AN EXTENSION OF THE SECRET NSA EXTENSION OF THE SECRET NSA WARRANTLESS EAVESDROPPING WARRANTLESS EAVESDROPPING PROGRAM OVER STRONG OBJECTIONS PROGRAM OVER STRONG OBJECTIONS EVEN THOUGH ASH CROFT WAS EVEN THOUGH ASH CROFT WAS SERIOUSLY ILL. SERIOUSLY ILL. EVEN THOUGH THIS ALL HAPPENED A EVEN THOUGH THIS ALL HAPPENED A FEW YEARS AGO, THE DETAILS JUST FEW YEARS AGO, THE DETAILS JUST REVEALED TODAY COULD SPELL NEW REVEALED TODAY COULD SPELL NEW TROUBLE FOR THE CURRENT ATTORNEY TROUBLE FOR THE CURRENT ATTORNEY GENERAL ALBERTO GONZALEZ. GENERAL ALBERTO GONZALEZ.>>THE SCANDAL WAS GONZALEZ>>THE SCANDAL WAS GONZALEZ TRYING TO STRONG ARM THE TRYING TO STRONG ARM THE ATTORNEY GENERAL TO APPROVE A ATTORNEY GENERAL TO APPROVE A PROGRAM THAT COMEY AND MUELLER PROGRAM THAT COMEY AND MUELLER THOUGHT MIGHT BE ILLEGAL. THOUGHT MIGHT BE ILLEGAL. WHEN THE STORY FINALLY CAME OUT, WHEN THE STORY FINALLY CAME OUT, JAMES COMEY GAVE A DRAMATIC JAMES COMEY GAVE A DRAMATIC RENDERING OF IT TO A RAPT RENDERING OF IT TO A RAPT CONGRESSIONAL HEARING. CONGRESSIONAL HEARING.>>I RACED TO THE HOSPITAL ROOM,>>I RACED TO THE HOSPITAL ROOM, ENTERED, AND MRS. ASHCROFT WAS ENTERED, AND MRS. ASHCROFT WAS STANDING BY THE HOSPITAL BED. STANDING BY THE HOSPITAL BED. MR. ASH CROFT WAS LYING DOWN IN MR. ASH CROFT WAS LYING DOWN IN THE BED. THE BED. THE ROOM WAS DARKENED. THE ROOM WAS DARKENED. THE IF IN FIB INSTRUCTED AGENTS THE IF IN FIB INSTRUCTED AGENTS PRESENT NOT TO ALLOW ME TO BE PRESENT NOT TO ALLOW ME TO BE REMOVED FROM THE ROOM UNDER ANY REMOVED FROM THE ROOM UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES. CIRCUMSTANCES. AND I WENT BACK IN THE ROOM. AND I WENT BACK IN THE ROOM. ATTORNEY GENERAL ASHCOST THEN ATTORNEY GENERAL ASHCOST THEN STUNNED ME. STUNNED ME.>>STUNNED ME.>>STUNNED ME. COMEY GOES BEYOND WHAT HAPPENED. COMEY GOES BEYOND WHAT HAPPENED. HE FAXED THE CONFRONTATION. HE FAXED THE CONFRONTATION. HE WAS STUNNED BY WHAT HAPPENED HE WAS STUNNED BY WHAT HAPPENED NEXT. NEXT. AND COMEY WANTS HIS LISTENERS TO AND COMEY WANTS HIS LISTENERS TO BE STUNNED, TOO, BECAUSE, WELL, BE STUNNED, TOO, BECAUSE, WELL, WE KNOW THIS BY NOW. WE KNOW THIS BY NOW. HE’S A VIVID STORY TELLER. HE’S A VIVID STORY TELLER. AT THAT HEARING THEN COMEY AT THAT HEARING THEN COMEY ACCOUNTS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL’S ACCOUNTS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL’S NEXT MOVE. NEXT MOVE.>>HE LIFTED HIS HEAD OFF THE>>HE LIFTED HIS HEAD OFF THE PILLOW, AND IN VERY STRONG PILLOW, AND IN VERY STRONG TERMS, EXPRESSED HIS VIEW OF THE TERMS, EXPRESSED HIS VIEW OF THE MATTER, RICH IN BOTH SUBSTANCE MATTER, RICH IN BOTH SUBSTANCE AND FACT, WHICH STUNNED ME, AND FACT, WHICH STUNNED ME, DRAWN FROM THE HOUR-LONG MEETING DRAWN FROM THE HOUR-LONG MEETING WE’D HAD A WEEK EARLIER, AND IN WE’D HAD A WEEK EARLIER, AND IN STRONG TERMS EXPRESSED HIMSELF, STRONG TERMS EXPRESSED HIMSELF, AND THEN LAID HIS HEAD BACK DOWN AND THEN LAID HIS HEAD BACK DOWN ON THE PILLOW. ON THE PILLOW. SEEMED SPENT, AND SAID TO THEM, SEEMED SPENT, AND SAID TO THEM, BUT THAT DOESN’T MATTER BECAUSE BUT THAT DOESN’T MATTER BECAUSE I’M NOT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL. I’M NOT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL.>>THE LAST LINE SHOWED ASH>>THE LAST LINE SHOWED ASH CROFT’S COMMITMENT TO THE RULES. CROFT’S COMMITMENT TO THE RULES. THE ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL IS THE ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL IS IN CHARGE. IN CHARGE. THAT THE MAERS FOR WHO IS GOING THAT THE MAERS FOR WHO IS GOING TO APPROVE THAT PROGRAM OR WHO TO APPROVE THAT PROGRAM OR WHO APPOINTS A SPECIAL COUNSEL. APPOINTS A SPECIAL COUNSEL. IT MATTERS A LOT. IT MATTERS A LOT. COMEY’S TESTIMONY WAS ACCURATE COMEY’S TESTIMONY WAS ACCURATE AND GRIPPING, BUT IF YOU HAD TO AND GRIPPING, BUT IF YOU HAD TO RELY ON MUELLER’S TESTIMONY TO RELY ON MUELLER’S TESTIMONY TO LEARN ABOUT THAT SAME EVENT, LEARN ABOUT THAT SAME EVENT, MUELLER BEING THE OTHER OFFICIAL MUELLER BEING THE OTHER OFFICIAL WHO KNEW WHAT WENT DOWN, YOU’D WHO KNEW WHAT WENT DOWN, YOU’D GET A PRETTY DIFFERENT PICTURE. GET A PRETTY DIFFERENT PICTURE. HERE WAS MUELLER’S TESTIMONY HERE WAS MUELLER’S TESTIMONY ABOUT THAT INTERACTION IN THAT ABOUT THAT INTERACTION IN THAT HOSPITAL ROOM, AND THIS Q & A IS HOSPITAL ROOM, AND THIS Q & A IS LIKE PULLING TEETH WITH MUELLER LIKE PULLING TEETH WITH MUELLER INTENT ON SAYING AS LITTLE AS INTENT ON SAYING AS LITTLE AS POSSIBLE. POSSIBLE.>>WERE YOU SURPRISED WHEN YOU>>WERE YOU SURPRISED WHEN YOU RECEIVED THE PHONE CALL FROM RECEIVED THE PHONE CALL FROM MR. COMEY INDICATING THAT THERE MR. COMEY INDICATING THAT THERE WAS GOING TO BE THIS VISIT TO WAS GOING TO BE THIS VISIT TO MR. ASHCROFT BY GONZALEZ AND MR. ASHCROFT BY GONZALEZ AND CARD? CARD?>>IT WAS OUT OF THE ORDINARY.>>IT WAS OUT OF THE ORDINARY.>>YOU’RE THE FBI DIRECTOR, A>>YOU’RE THE FBI DIRECTOR, A SENIOR OFFICIAL CALLS YOU AND SENIOR OFFICIAL CALLS YOU AND SAYS, MAKE SURE THAT I’M NOT SAYS, MAKE SURE THAT I’M NOT EVICTED FROM THE ROOM — AND I’M EVICTED FROM THE ROOM — AND I’M SURE THAT MUST HAVE STRUCK YOU SURE THAT MUST HAVE STRUCK YOU AS BEING AN UNUSUAL REQUEST, AS BEING AN UNUSUAL REQUEST, DIDN’T IT? DIDN’T IT?>>YES.>>YES.>>DID YOU TAKE NOTES AND>>DID YOU TAKE NOTES AND MEMORIALIZE YOUR CONVERSATION MEMORIALIZE YOUR CONVERSATION WITH MR. COMEY AT THAT POINT? WITH MR. COMEY AT THAT POINT?>>I DON’T KNOW.>>I DON’T KNOW. AT THAT POINT I DID NOT. AT THAT POINT I DID NOT.>>AT SOME POINT DID YOU>>AT SOME POINT DID YOU MEMORIALIZE YOUR CONVERSATIONS MEMORIALIZE YOUR CONVERSATIONS REGARDING THIS VISIT WITH REGARDING THIS VISIT WITH MR. COMEY? MR. COMEY?>>I MAY HAVE, YES.>>I MAY HAVE, YES.>>DO YOU STILL HAVE THOSE>>DO YOU STILL HAVE THOSE NOTES? NOTES?>>YES.>>YES.>>AND ARE THEY AVAILABLE TO THE>>AND ARE THEY AVAILABLE TO THE COMMITTEE IF THE COMMITTEE WERE COMMITTEE IF THE COMMITTEE WERE TO ASK FOR THEM? TO ASK FOR THEM?>>I WOULD HAVE TO GET BACK TO>>I WOULD HAVE TO GET BACK TO YOU ON THAT. YOU ON THAT.>>TELL ME WHY YOU DECIDED TO>>TELL ME WHY YOU DECIDED TO MAKE NOTES OF YOUR CONVERSATION MAKE NOTES OF YOUR CONVERSATION WITH MR. ASH CROFT. WITH MR. ASH CROFT.>>IT WAS OUT OF THE ORDINARY.>>IT WAS OUT OF THE ORDINARY.>>WHAT WAS OUT OF THE ORDINARY,>>WHAT WAS OUT OF THE ORDINARY, MR. MUELLER? MR. MUELLER?>>BEING ASKED TO GO TO THE>>BEING ASKED TO GO TO THE HOSPITAL AND, AND BE PRESENT AT HOSPITAL AND, AND BE PRESENT AT THAT TIME. THAT TIME.>>THIS IS INCREDIBLE.>>THIS IS INCREDIBLE. I MEAN, LET’S HAVE REAL TALK. I MEAN, LET’S HAVE REAL TALK. WHEN A CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS WHEN A CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS GOES DOWN IN A HOSPITAL ROOM AND GOES DOWN IN A HOSPITAL ROOM AND PEOPLE WITH GUNS HAVE TO PROTECT PEOPLE WITH GUNS HAVE TO PROTECT THE ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL FROM THE ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL FROM THE PRESIDENT’S COUNSEL, YEAH, THE PRESIDENT’S COUNSEL, YEAH, IT’S OUT OF THE ORDINARY. IT’S OUT OF THE ORDINARY. IT’S A PRETTY UNDERSTATED WAY TO IT’S A PRETTY UNDERSTATED WAY TO PUT IT. PUT IT. YOU CAN SEE THIS CONTRAST AND YOU CAN SEE THIS CONTRAST AND HOW COMEY DESCRIBES THE FALLOUT HOW COMEY DESCRIBES THE FALLOUT FROM THAT INCIDENT, AND THESE FROM THAT INCIDENT, AND THESE OTHER OFFICIALS WHO WERE OTHER OFFICIALS WHO WERE BASICALLY PREPPING A SATURDAY BASICALLY PREPPING A SATURDAY NIGHT STYLE MASSACRE OF SORTS NIGHT STYLE MASSACRE OF SORTS FOR BUSH. FOR BUSH.>>I PREPARED A LETTER OF>>I PREPARED A LETTER OF RESIGNATION INTENDING TO RESIGN RESIGNATION INTENDING TO RESIGN THE NEXT DAY, FRIDAY, MARCH THE THE NEXT DAY, FRIDAY, MARCH THE 12th. 12th.>>YOU BELIEVED THAT OTHERS WERE>>YOU BELIEVED THAT OTHERS WERE ALSO PREPARED TO RESIGN, NOT ALSO PREPARED TO RESIGN, NOT JUST YOU? JUST YOU? IS THAT CORRECT? IS THAT CORRECT?>>YES.>>YES.>>OKAY.>>OKAY. WAS ONE OF THOSE DIRECTOR WAS ONE OF THOSE DIRECTOR MUELLER? MUELLER?>>I BELIEVE SO.>>I BELIEVE SO. YOU’D HAVE TO ASK HIM, BUT I YOU’D HAVE TO ASK HIM, BUT I BELIEVE SO. BELIEVE SO.>>COMEY’S TOUTING HIS READINESS>>COMEY’S TOUTING HIS READINESS TO RESIGN. TO RESIGN. COMEY CHANGED UNDER THAT COMEY CHANGED UNDER THAT PRESSURE. PRESSURE. MUELLER FOUND A WAY TO EVEN MUELLER FOUND A WAY TO EVEN AVOID CONFIRMING THIS DIRECTLY. AVOID CONFIRMING THIS DIRECTLY. HE QUOTED COMEY AND WAIVED OFF HE QUOTED COMEY AND WAIVED OFF REQUEST TO INTERPRET THIS REQUEST TO INTERPRET THIS EPISODE. EPISODE.>>I DON’T DISPUTE WHAT>>I DON’T DISPUTE WHAT MR. COMEY SAYS. MR. COMEY SAYS.>>OKAY.>>OKAY. WHAT DO YOU MAKE OF THAT WHOLE WHAT DO YOU MAKE OF THAT WHOLE EPISODE — EPISODE –>>UNFORTUNATELY, CONGRESSMAN, I>>UNFORTUNATELY, CONGRESSMAN, I DON’T THINK IT APPROPRIATE TO DON’T THINK IT APPROPRIATE TO SPECULATE. SPECULATE. I CAN ANSWER QUESTIONS AS TO I CAN ANSWER QUESTIONS AS TO WHAT HAPPENED TO THE EXTENT THAT WHAT HAPPENED TO THE EXTENT THAT I’M ABLE TO, BUT BEYOND THAT I’D I’M ABLE TO, BUT BEYOND THAT I’D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY FURTHER BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS — QUESTIONS –>>CAN YOU CONFIRM THAT YOU AND>>CAN YOU CONFIRM THAT YOU AND SOME OF YOUR AGENTS WERE SOME OF YOUR AGENTS WERE PREPARED TO RESIGN BECAUSE OF PREPARED TO RESIGN BECAUSE OF LEADING UP TO THIS CONTROVERSY? LEADING UP TO THIS CONTROVERSY?>>AGAIN, I’M UNCOMFORTABLE>>AGAIN, I’M UNCOMFORTABLE GETTING INTO CONVERSATIONS I HAD GETTING INTO CONVERSATIONS I HAD WITH INDIVIDUALS BECAUSE I DO WITH INDIVIDUALS BECAUSE I DO BELIEVE THAT INDIVIDUALS ARE BELIEVE THAT INDIVIDUALS ARE ENTITLED TO MY UNFETTERED ENTITLED TO MY UNFETTERED THOUGHTS. THOUGHTS.>>THEN THE TRICKY LEARNING>>THEN THE TRICKY LEARNING KICKS IN. KICKS IN. THE CONGRESSMAN PRESSES MUELLER THE CONGRESSMAN PRESSES MUELLER ON WHETHER HE DID PREPARE TO ON WHETHER HE DID PREPARE TO RESIGN OVER THIS, AND MUELLER RESIGN OVER THIS, AND MUELLER EVADES IT BY EMPHASIZING, WELL, EVADES IT BY EMPHASIZING, WELL, COMEY’S TESTIMONY SAID YOU’D COMEY’S TESTIMONY SAID YOU’D HAVE TO ASK MUELLER. HAVE TO ASK MUELLER.>>WAS HE CORRECT?>>WAS HE CORRECT? BETTER YET, WERE YOU THAT BETTER YET, WERE YOU THAT PERSON? PERSON?>>WELL, I WAS THAT PERSON TO>>WELL, I WAS THAT PERSON TO WHOM HE REFERS, YES. WHOM HE REFERS, YES.>>DID YOU CONSIDER RESIGNING?>>DID YOU CONSIDER RESIGNING? THIS IS YOUR OWN MIND. THIS IS YOUR OWN MIND.>>I UNDERSTAND — I UNDERSTAND>>I UNDERSTAND — I UNDERSTAND WHY I CANNOT SAY THAT I DO NOT WHY I CANNOT SAY THAT I DO NOT DISPUTE WHAT MR. COMEY SAYS DISPUTE WHAT MR. COMEY SAYS BECAUSE MR. COMEY SAYS ASK BECAUSE MR. COMEY SAYS ASK MR. MUELLER. MR. MUELLER. I WILL TELL YOU THAT I DON’T I WILL TELL YOU THAT I DON’T BELIEVE IT’S APPROPRIATE FOR ME BELIEVE IT’S APPROPRIATE FOR ME TOE GET INTO CONVERSATIONS I’VE TOE GET INTO CONVERSATIONS I’VE HAD WITH PRINCIPALS ON THAT HAD WITH PRINCIPALS ON THAT ISSUE. ISSUE.>>THERE WAS A CENTRAL QUESTION.>>THERE WAS A CENTRAL QUESTION. MUELLER SLICES IT INTO PIECES, MUELLER SLICES IT INTO PIECES, DANCES AROUND IT AND SAYS, HEY, DANCES AROUND IT AND SAYS, HEY, I’M NOT GOING TO TELL YOU. I’M NOT GOING TO TELL YOU. I DON’T THINK IT’S APPROPRIATE. I DON’T THINK IT’S APPROPRIATE. THIS IS REALLY IMPORTANT FOR THIS IS REALLY IMPORTANT FOR NEXT WEEK, AND THE CRIMINAL NEXT WEEK, AND THE CRIMINAL EVIDENCE AGAINST THE PRESIDENT. EVIDENCE AGAINST THE PRESIDENT. CONGRESS NEVER GOT A FULLER CONGRESS NEVER GOT A FULLER ANSWER ON THAT ISSUE THERE, SO ANSWER ON THAT ISSUE THERE, SO YOU CAN CONTRAFRT NOW THESE TWO YOU CAN CONTRAFRT NOW THESE TWO TOP OFFICIALS DISCUSSING THE TOP OFFICIALS DISCUSSING THE SAME INCIDENT AS A PREVIEW FOR SAME INCIDENT AS A PREVIEW FOR NEXT WEEK. NEXT WEEK.>>I RACED TO THE HOSPITAL ROOM,>>I RACED TO THE HOSPITAL ROOM, MR. ASH CROFT WAS LYING DOWN IN MR. ASH CROFT WAS LYING DOWN IN THE BED, THE ROOM WAS DARKENED. THE BED, THE ROOM WAS DARKENED.>>IT WAS OUT OF THE ORDINARY?>>IT WAS OUT OF THE ORDINARY?>>I PREPARED A LETTER OF>>I PREPARED A LETTER OF RESIGNATION TO RESIGN. RESIGNATION TO RESIGN.>>I DON’T BELIEVE IT’S>>I DON’T BELIEVE IT’S APPROPRIATE FOR ME TO GET INTO APPROPRIATE FOR ME TO GET INTO CONVERSATIONS I’VE HAD WITH CONVERSATIONS I’VE HAD WITH PRINCIPALS ON THAT ISSUE. PRINCIPALS ON THAT ISSUE.>>MUELLER WILL HAVE EVEN MORE>>MUELLER WILL HAVE EVEN MORE RATIONALES NEXT WEEK FOR WHY RATIONALES NEXT WEEK FOR WHY SOME ANSWER IS UNAPPROPRIATE. SOME ANSWER IS UNAPPROPRIATE. GRAND JURD I LAW, D.O.J. RULES, GRAND JURD I LAW, D.O.J. RULES, THE CREDIBLE CONSIDERATION THAT THE CREDIBLE CONSIDERATION THAT PEOPLE MUELLER INDICTED ARE PEOPLE MUELLER INDICTED ARE STILL AWAITING TRIAL FROM THE STILL AWAITING TRIAL FROM THE RUSSIANS AT LARGE TO ROGER RUSSIANS AT LARGE TO ROGER STONE. STONE. THOSE RATIONALES ARE LEGIT, BUT THOSE RATIONALES ARE LEGIT, BUT WE ALSO KNOW MUELLER ERRS ON THE WE ALSO KNOW MUELLER ERRS ON THE SIDE OF LESS COMMON REGARDLESS. SIDE OF LESS COMMON REGARDLESS. PAST COUNSELS HAVE SPOKEN PAST COUNSELS HAVE SPOKEN FREELY. FREELY. MUELLER’S TEAM NEVER DID. MUELLER’S TEAM NEVER DID.>>IF YOU’RE THE SPOKESMAN FOR>>IF YOU’RE THE SPOKESMAN FOR THE SPECIAL COUNSEL’S OFFICE, THE SPECIAL COUNSEL’S OFFICE, YOUR JOB IS TO NEVER SAY YOUR JOB IS TO NEVER SAY ANYTHING. ANYTHING.>>NO COMMENT FROM THE SPECIAL>>NO COMMENT FROM THE SPECIAL COUNSEL’S OFFICE. COUNSEL’S OFFICE.>>THE SPECIAL COUNSEL’S OFFICE>>THE SPECIAL COUNSEL’S OFFICE BASICALLY NEVER SAYS ANYTHING BASICALLY NEVER SAYS ANYTHING EVER ABOUT ANY STORY EVER. EVER ABOUT ANY STORY EVER.>>THE SPECIAL COUNSEL’S OFFICE>>THE SPECIAL COUNSEL’S OFFICE DECLINED TO COMMENT. DECLINED TO COMMENT.>>THE SPOKESMAN FOR THE SPECIAL>>THE SPOKESMAN FOR THE SPECIAL COUNSEL’S OFFICE IS DECLINING TO COUNSEL’S OFFICE IS DECLINING TO COMMENT. COMMENT.>>THE SPECIAL COUNSEL’S OFFICE>>THE SPECIAL COUNSEL’S OFFICE DECLINED TO COMMENT. DECLINED TO COMMENT.>>THE SPECIAL COUNSEL’S OFFICE>>THE SPECIAL COUNSEL’S OFFICE ALMOST NEVER MAKES PUBLIC ALMOST NEVER MAKES PUBLIC COMMENTS. COMMENTS.>>THAT’S JUST A CHOICE.>>THAT’S JUST A CHOICE. WE KNOW THAT BECAUSE OTHER WE KNOW THAT BECAUSE OTHER PROSECUTORS WOULD SPEAK OUT FAR PROSECUTORS WOULD SPEAK OUT FAR MORE STARKLY. MORE STARKLY. HERE’S A PROSECUTOR WHO PROBED A HERE’S A PROSECUTOR WHO PROBED A DEMOCRATIC WHITE HOUSE AND TOLD DEMOCRATIC WHITE HOUSE AND TOLD AMERICA HIS OWN CONCLUSIONS. AMERICA HIS OWN CONCLUSIONS.>>THE PRESIDENT REPEATEDLY>>THE PRESIDENT REPEATEDLY TRIED TO THWART THE LEGAL TRIED TO THWART THE LEGAL PROCESS. PROCESS. THE PRESIDENT CHOSE DECEPTION. THE PRESIDENT CHOSE DECEPTION.>>HERE’S A PROSECUTOR WHO>>HERE’S A PROSECUTOR WHO PROBED A REPUBLICAN WHITE HOUSE PROBED A REPUBLICAN WHITE HOUSE AND TOLD AMERICA HIS OWN AND TOLD AMERICA HIS OWN CONCLUSIONS. CONCLUSIONS.>>THE IRAN CONTRA COVER UP HAS>>THE IRAN CONTRA COVER UP HAS CONTINUED FOR MORE THAN SIX CONTINUED FOR MORE THAN SIX YEARS. YEARS. A PART OF A DISTURBING PATTERN A PART OF A DISTURBING PATTERN OF DECEPTION AND OBSTRUCTION OF DECEPTION AND OBSTRUCTION THAT PERMEATED THE HIGHEST THAT PERMEATED THE HIGHEST LEVELS OF THE REAGAN AND BUSH LEVELS OF THE REAGAN AND BUSH ADMINISTRATIONS. ADMINISTRATIONS.>>IT CAN BE DONE.>>IT CAN BE DONE. YOU CAN HIT THE PRESIDENT WITH A YOU CAN HIT THE PRESIDENT WITH A 2 BY 4 AFTER YOU INVESTIGATE HIM 2 BY 4 AFTER YOU INVESTIGATE HIM IF YOU WANT. IF YOU WANT. RHETORICALLY, BUT BOB MUELLER RHETORICALLY, BUT BOB MUELLER DOESN’T DO THAT, AND THAT BRINGS DOESN’T DO THAT, AND THAT BRINGS ME TO THE OTHER THING YOU NEED ME TO THE OTHER THING YOU NEED TO KNOW IF YOU WANT TO TO KNOW IF YOU WANT TO UNDERSTAND THE PREDICATE AND THE UNDERSTAND THE PREDICATE AND THE FACTS FOR NEXT WEEK’S BLOCK FACTS FOR NEXT WEEK’S BLOCK BUSTER HEARING. BUSTER HEARING. I’M TALKING ABOUT BEEF. I’M TALKING ABOUT BEEF. HOW DO PEOPLE WHO WIELD THE HOW DO PEOPLE WHO WIELD THE GREATEST POWER TO INVESTIGATE, GREATEST POWER TO INVESTIGATE, TO DETAIN, TO EXECUTE, HOW DO TO DETAIN, TO EXECUTE, HOW DO THEY ACT WHEN THEY SURRENDER THEY ACT WHEN THEY SURRENDER THOSE POWERS WHEN THEY HAVE THOSE POWERS WHEN THEY HAVE RIVALRIES, BEEF WITH THE NEW RIVALRIES, BEEF WITH THE NEW FOLKS WHO COME INTO OFFICE? FOLKS WHO COME INTO OFFICE? WELL, SOME USE THEIR POSITION TO WELL, SOME USE THEIR POSITION TO BLAST THEIR FOES IN THE NEW BLAST THEIR FOES IN THE NEW ADMINISTRATION. ADMINISTRATION. WITH TRUMP SHATTERING NORMS, WITH TRUMP SHATTERING NORMS, WE’VE SEEN SOME VETERANS OF WE’VE SEEN SOME VETERANS OF PUBLIC SERVICE GO AFTER HIM AS PUBLIC SERVICE GO AFTER HIM AS BASICALLY A LIAR WHO IS, QUOTE, BASICALLY A LIAR WHO IS, QUOTE, WORSE THAN WATERGATE AND EVEN WORSE THAN WATERGATE AND EVEN GUILTY OF, QUOTE, TREASONOUS GUILTY OF, QUOTE, TREASONOUS CONDUCT. CONDUCT.>>WHEN I USE THE TERM THIS IS>>WHEN I USE THE TERM THIS IS NOTHING SHORT OF TREASONOUS, I’D NOTHING SHORT OF TREASONOUS, I’D EQUATE IT TO THE BETRAYAL OF EQUATE IT TO THE BETRAYAL OF ONE’S NATION. ONE’S NATION. AIDING AND ABETTING GIVING AIDING AND ABETTING GIVING COMFORT TO AN ENEMY. COMFORT TO AN ENEMY.>>WATERGATE PALES, REALLY, IN>>WATERGATE PALES, REALLY, IN MY VIEW, COMPARED TO WHAT WE’RE MY VIEW, COMPARED TO WHAT WE’RE CONFRONTING NOW. CONFRONTING NOW.>>THOSE WERE LIES, PLAIN AND>>THOSE WERE LIES, PLAIN AND SIMPLE. SIMPLE.>>>I’M ABOUT TO TALK TO HIM>>>I’M ABOUT TO TALK TO HIM ABOUT ALLEGATIONS THAT HE WAS ABOUT ALLEGATIONS THAT HE WAS INVOLVED WITH PROSTITUTES IN INVOLVED WITH PROSTITUTES IN MOSCOW AND THE RUSSIANS TAPED MOSCOW AND THE RUSSIANS TAPED IT. IT.>>THAT’S ONE WAY TO DO IT.>>THAT’S ONE WAY TO DO IT. OUR REPORTING, THOUGH, TONIGHT OUR REPORTING, THOUGH, TONIGHT IS AFTER REVIEWING MUELLER’S 60 IS AFTER REVIEWING MUELLER’S 60 DIFFERENT TIMES HE TESTIFIED DIFFERENT TIMES HE TESTIFIED BEFORE CONGRESS, THAT’S NOT BEFORE CONGRESS, THAT’S NOT MUELLER’S WAY, WHICH GIVES YOU MUELLER’S WAY, WHICH GIVES YOU TWO IMPLICATIONS FOR NEXT WEEK. TWO IMPLICATIONS FOR NEXT WEEK. THOSE WHO WANT A BARRAGE AGAINST THOSE WHO WANT A BARRAGE AGAINST TRUMP THAT GOES BEYOND THE TRUMP THAT GOES BEYOND THE EVIDENCE IN THE REPORT, EVIDENCE IN THE REPORT, MUELLER’S TESTIMONY TYPICALLY MUELLER’S TESTIMONY TYPICALLY DOES NOT OPINE. DOES NOT OPINE. IT DOESN’T TRAFFIC IN THE IT DOESN’T TRAFFIC IN THE RHETORIC OF LIES OR TAMPA BAY RHETORIC OF LIES OR TAMPA BAY RAYS TREES ON OR UNVERIFIED RAYS TREES ON OR UNVERIFIED INFORMATION. INFORMATION. HE’S NOT JUST THE ANTI-TRUMP IN HE’S NOT JUST THE ANTI-TRUMP IN A WAY. A WAY. MUELLER IS ALSO THE ANTI-COMEY MUELLER IS ALSO THE ANTI-COMEY AND THE ANTI-BRENNAN, AND REALLY AND THE ANTI-BRENNAN, AND REALLY WHILE WE’RE AT IT, THE WHILE WE’RE AT IT, THE ANTI-MEDIA. ANTI-MEDIA. TRUMP IS A REALITY TV PRESIDENT. TRUMP IS A REALITY TV PRESIDENT. HE’S ADEPT AT THAT PART. HE’S ADEPT AT THAT PART. MUELLER IS A FACTS PROSECUTOR. MUELLER IS A FACTS PROSECUTOR. HE’S ADEPT AT THAT PART. HE’S ADEPT AT THAT PART. THE MUELLER REPORT IS ABOUT THE MUELLER REPORT IS ABOUT FACTS. FACTS. WHAT THEY FOUND, WHAT THE WHAT THEY FOUND, WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS, WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS, WHAT THE PROVABLE FACTS ARE. PROVABLE FACTS ARE. THAT IS WHY, REMEMBER, SO MANY THAT IS WHY, REMEMBER, SO MANY PEOPLE HAVE ALREADY BEEN CHARGED PEOPLE HAVE ALREADY BEEN CHARGED AND CONVICTED FROM THE MUELLER AND CONVICTED FROM THE MUELLER PROBE. PROBE. IT’S WHY DONALD TRUMP BROKE THE IT’S WHY DONALD TRUMP BROKE THE RECORD FOR MOST ADVISORS RECORD FOR MOST ADVISORS CONVICTED THIS EARLY IN HIS CONVICTED THIS EARLY IN HIS PRESIDENCY, WHAT YOU SEE ON YOUR PRESIDENCY, WHAT YOU SEE ON YOUR SCREEN. SCREEN. NOT A RECORD MOST PRESIDENTS NOT A RECORD MOST PRESIDENTS WANT TO WIN. WANT TO WIN.>>>A USEFUL HEARING HERE COULD>>>A USEFUL HEARING HERE COULD FOCUS ON THE FACTS IN THE FOCUS ON THE FACTS IN THE MUELLER REPORT. MUELLER REPORT. BE READY FOR CRITICS WHO THEN BE READY FOR CRITICS WHO THEN SAY THIS HEARING IS JUST ANOTHER SAY THIS HEARING IS JUST ANOTHER ROUND OF THE SAME OLD THING. ROUND OF THE SAME OLD THING. PRESIDENT TRUMP RECENTLY TRIED PRESIDENT TRUMP RECENTLY TRIED OUT A VERSION OF THAT TALKING OUT A VERSION OF THAT TALKING POINT. POINT. IT’S OLD NEWS. IT’S OLD NEWS. BUT THE POINT NEXT WEEK WILL NOT BUT THE POINT NEXT WEEK WILL NOT BE ABOUT THE AGE OF THE EVIDENCE BE ABOUT THE AGE OF THE EVIDENCE AGAINST TRUMP. AGAINST TRUMP. IT WILL BE ABOUT THE TRUTH. IT WILL BE ABOUT THE TRUTH. I DON’T KNOW IF BOB MUELLER HAS I DON’T KNOW IF BOB MUELLER HAS EVER LISTENED TO THE RABER LEC EVER LISTENED TO THE RABER LEC RAE, BUT HE HAS SOME BARS THAT RAE, BUT HE HAS SOME BARS THAT APPLY EXACTLY. APPLY EXACTLY. PEOPLE SAY I TALK ABOUT THE SAME PEOPLE SAY I TALK ABOUT THE SAME OLD THING. OLD THING. THE REASON WHY I SOUND THE SAME THE REASON WHY I SOUND THE SAME IS BECAUSE THE TRUTH DON’T IS BECAUSE THE TRUTH DON’T CHANGE. CHANGE. THE TRUTH IS THE MUELLER REPORT THE TRUTH IS THE MUELLER REPORT LISTS SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE THE LISTS SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE THE PRESIDENT OBSTRUCTED JUSTICE PRESIDENT OBSTRUCTED JUSTICE SEVERAL TIMES IN OFFICE. SEVERAL TIMES IN OFFICE. NEXT WEEK, AMERICANS WILL HEAR NEXT WEEK, AMERICANS WILL HEAR BOB MUELLER PRESENT HIS FINDINGS BOB MUELLER PRESENT HIS FINDINGS UNDER OATH FOR THE FIRST TIME. UNDER OATH FOR THE FIRST TIME. THE TRUTH AS HIS INVESTIGATION THE TRUTH AS HIS INVESTIGATION DETERMINED IT. DETERMINED IT. PEOPLE CAN ASSESS WHAT THOSE PEOPLE CAN ASSESS WHAT THOSE FINDINGS MEAN. FINDINGS MEAN. SHOULD CONGRESS DO ANYTHING SHOULD CONGRESS DO ANYTHING ABOUT THEM? ABOUT THEM? SHOULD THEY IMPACT WHETHER THIS SHOULD THEY IMPACT WHETHER THIS PRESIDENT IS REELECTED? PRESIDENT IS REELECTED? THOSE ARE OPEN QUESTIONS THAT, THOSE ARE OPEN QUESTIONS THAT, ACCORDING TO OUR RESEARCH, BOB ACCORDING TO OUR RESEARCH, BOB MUELLER WILL NOT ANSWER. MUELLER WILL NOT ANSWER. IT WILL BE JUST THE FACTS.

Author Since: Mar 11, 2019

  1. An observation. The behaviour of Senators in the hearings of the Bush era is far more professional than the current Trump era. Currently, a few of the Republican senators seem to rant and rave and make statements rather than hold an enquiry and get answers.

  2. Mueller will testify and get roasted by the Republicans worse than the Dems. The Dems wasted their time subpoenaing Mueller as it’ll be another loss and public disgrace for the Dems. He already said everything he needed to say in his 2 yr investigation. The Dems cards have been played. The Republicans however have more questions surrounding how the original investigation was initiated. Another notch for Trump in 2020.

  3. WRONG!!!!! AGAIN!!!! Typical msnbc activist, cheerleader. What a bunch of flunkies for following this bozo.

  4. Mueller had better hope that AG William Barr doesn't indict him for personally delivering a Sample of the #YellowCakeUranium in the Clinton's $145 Million Dollars worth of U.S. Weapons Grade Uranium to Vladimir Putin in the still Covered-Up #UraniumOneScandal !!!

  5. I wonder if Mueller is going to wear the red tie with white accents for this testimony like he did the rest. Nobody keeps a tie in good condition for that long, it's a different one in most of the comparison footage but the same look 3:17.

  6. Hopefully congress do their constitutional mandate and ask serious questions to the matter of Russian collusion and conspiracy to obstruct justice and any laws that have been broken so that our nation can put this issue to rest but half answers, half measures, congressional silence will never but this behind us. Congress needs to bring back the rule of law and democracy to our nation. After all this the American people need to put pressure to congress and hold their feet to the fire.

  7. Most of y’all say he is racist. But never noticed that he has done more for the other race then any of the presidents. Most of y’all say multiple things that are not true but you see on news. Then you believe what they say but don’t see what is real. It takes a president that is helping the USA. He is not paid he revoked it. The dems don’t want you to see they turn your head to negative things for which they put into your heads to believe. Most of y’all believe on open borders or free college. I will regret to see what happens. Your price’s of food will go up your jobs will most likely be going to other countries because of higher taxes. So you go ahead and believe what you will I am going to vote for our president again.

  8. This is crazy! For 2 years we heard nothing from Mueller. It seems the news only had the same news footage on loop. Now all of sudden we learn there's decades of footage.

  9. From 2001 to 2005 there was an ongoing investigation into the Clinton Foundation.

    A Grand Jury had been impanelled.

    Governments from around the world had donated to the “Charity”.

    Yet, from 2001 to 2003 none of those “Donations” to the Clinton Foundation were declared. Now you would think that an honest investigator would be able to figure this out.

    Look who took over this investigation in 2005: None other than James Comey; Coincidence? Guess who was transferred into the Internal Revenue Service to run the Tax Exemption Branch of the IRS? None other than, Lois “Be on The Look Out” (BOLO) Lerner. Isn’t that interesting?

    But this is all just a series of strange coincidences, right?

    Guess who ran the Tax Division inside the Department of Injustice from 2001 to 2005?

    No other than the Assistant Attorney General of the United States,

    Rod Rosenstein.

    Guess who was the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation during this time frame?

    Another coincidence (just an anomaly in statistics and chances), but it was Robert Mueller.

    What do all four casting characters have in common?

    They all were briefed and/or were front-line investigators into the Clinton Foundation Investigation.

    Another coincidence, right?

    Fast forward to 2009….

    James Comey leaves the Justice Department to go and cash-in at Lockheed Martin.

    Hillary Clinton is running the State Department, official government business, on her own personal email server.

    The Uranium One “issue” comes to the attention of the Hillary.

    Like all good public servants do, supposedly looking out for America’s best interest, she decides to support the decision and approve the sale of 20% of US Uranium to no other than, the Russians.

    Now you would think that this is a fairly straight up deal, except it wasn’t, America got absolutely nothing out of it.

    However, prior to the sales approval, no other than Bill Clinton goes to Moscow, gets paid 500K for a one hour speech; then meets with Vladimir Putin at his home for a few hours.

    Ok, no big deal right? Well, not so fast, the FBI had a mole inside the money laundering and bribery scheme.

    Robert Mueller was the FBI Director during this time frame? Yep, He even delivered a Uranium Sample to Moscow in 2009.

    Who was handling that case within the Justice Department out of the US Attorney’s Office in Maryland?

    None other than, Rod Rosenstein. And what happened to the informant?

    The Department of Justice placed a GAG order on him and threatened to lock him up if he spoke out about it.

    How does 20% of the most strategic asset of the United States of America end up in Russian hands when the FBI has an informant, a mole providing inside information to the FBI on the criminal enterprise?

    Very soon after; the sale was approved!~145 million dollars in “donations” made their way into the Clinton Foundation from entities directly connected to the Uranium One deal.

    Guess who was still at the Internal Revenue Service working the Charitable Division? None other than, – Lois Lerner.

    Ok, that’s all just another series of coincidences, nothing to see here, right?

    Let’s fast forward to 2015.

    Due to a series of tragic events in Benghazi and after the 9 “investigations” the House, Senate and at State Department, Trey Gowdy who was running the 10th investigation as Chairman of the Select Committee on Benghazi discovers that the Hillary ran the State Department on an unclassified, unauthorized, outlaw personal email server. He also discovered that none of those emails had been turned over when she departed her “Public Service” as Secretary of State which was required by law. He also discovered that there was Top Secret information contained within her personally archived email.

    Sparing you the State Departments cover up, the nostrums they floated, the delay tactics that were employed and the outright lies that were spewed forth from the necks of the Kerry State Department, we shall leave it with this…… they did everything humanly possible to cover for Hillary.

    Now this is amazing, guess who became FBI Director in 2013? None other than James Comey; who secured 17 no bid contracts for his employer (Lockheed Martin) with the State Department and was rewarded with a six million dollar thank you present when he departed his employer? Amazing how all those no-bids just went right through at State, huh?

    Now he is the FBI Director in charge of the “Clinton Email Investigation” after of course his FBI Investigates the Lois Lerner “Matter” at the Internal Revenue Service and he exonerates her. Nope…. couldn’t find any crimes there.

    In April 2016, James Comey drafts an exoneration letter of Hillary Rodham Clinton, meanwhile the DOJ is handing out immunity deals like candy.They didn’t even convene a Grand Jury!

    Like a lightning bolt of statistical impossibility, like a miracle from God himself, like the true “Gangsta” Comey is, James steps out into the cameras of an awaiting press conference on July the 8th of 2016, and exonerates the Hillary from any wrongdoing.

    Do you see the pattern?

    It goes on and on, Rosenstein becomes Asst. Attorney General, Comey gets fired based upon a letter by Rosenstein, Comey leaks government information to the press, Mueller is assigned to the Russian Investigation sham by Rosenstein to provide cover for decades of malfeasance within the FBI and DOJ and the story continues.

    FISA Abuse, political espionage….. pick a crime, any crime, chances are…… this group and a few others did it:

    All the same players.

    All compromised and conflicted.

    All working fervently to NOT go to jail themselves.

    All connected in one way or another to the Clinton's.

    They are like battery acid; they corrode and corrupt everything they touch.How many lives have these two destroyed?

    As of this writing, the Clinton Foundation, in its 20+ years of operation of being the largest International Charity Fraud in the history of mankind, has never been audited by the Internal Revenue Service.

    Let us not forget that Comey's brother works for DLA Piper, the law firm that does the Clinton Foundation's taxes.

    The person that is the common denominator to all the crimes above and still doing her evil escape legal maneuvers at the top of the 3 Letter USA Agencies?

    Yep, that would be Hillary R. Clinton.

    Now who is LISA BARSOOMIAN? Let’s learn a little about Mrs. Lisa H. Barsoomian’s background.

    Lisa H. Barsoomian, an Attorney that graduated from Georgetown Law, is a protégé of James Comey and Robert Mueller.

    Barsoomian, with her boss R. Craig Lawrence, represented Bill Clinton in 1998.

    Lawrence also represented:

    Robert Mueller three times;

    James Comey five times;

    Barack Obama 45 times;

    Kathleen Sebelius 56 times;

    Bill Clinton 40 times; and

    Hillary Clinton 17 times.

    Between 1998 and 2017, Barsoomian herself represented the FBI at least five times.

    You may be saying to yourself, OK, who cares? Who cares about the work history of this Barsoomian woman?

    Apparently, someone does, because someone out there cares so much that they’ve “purged” all Barsoomian court documents for her Clinton representation in Hamburg vs. Clinton in 1998 and its appeal in 1999 from the DC District and Appeals Court dockets (?). Someone out there cares so much that even the internet has been “purged” of all information pertaining to Barsoomian.

    Historically, this indicates that the individual is a protected CIA operative. Additionally, Lisa Barsoomian has specialized in opposing Freedom of Information Act requests on behalf of the intelligence community. Although Barsoomian has been involved in hundreds of cases representing the DC Office of the US Attorney, her email address is Lisa Barsoomian at NIH.gov. The NIH stands for National Institutes of Health. This is a tactic routinely used by the CIA to protect an operative by using another government organization to shield their activities.

    It’s a cover, so big deal right? What does one more attorney with ties to the US intelligence community really matter?

    It deals with Trump and his recent tariffs on Chinese steel and aluminum imports, the border wall, DACA, everything coming out of California, the Uni-party unrelenting opposition to President Trump, the Clapper leaks, the Comey leaks, Attorney General Jeff Sessions recusal and subsequent 14 month nap with occasional forays into the marijuana legalization mix …. and last but not least Mueller’s never-ending investigation into collusion between the Trump team and-the Russians.

    Why does Barsoomian, CIA operative, merit any mention?

    BECAUSE….

    She is Assistant Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s WIFE.

  10. The Russian collusion investigation was corrupt when Mueller was appointed to the Special Counsel, he had a personal and professional relationship with James Comey, that is a conflict of interest.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2017/live-updates/trump-white-house/trump-comey-and-russia-how-key-washington-players-are-reacting/brothers-in-arms-the-long-friendship-between-mueller-and-comey/?utm_term=.73180b7fb051

    28 U.S. CODE §45.2 (a)

    § 45.2 Disqualification arising from personal or political relationship.

    (a) Unless authorized underparagraph (b) of this section, no employee shall participate in a criminal investigation or prosecution if he has a personal or political relationship with:

    (1) Any person or organization substantially involved in the conduct that is the subject of the investigation or prosecution; or

    (2) Any person or organization which he knows has a specific and substantial interest that would be directly affected by the outcome of the investigation or prosecution.

    (b) An employee assigned to or otherwise participating in a criminal investigation or prosecution who believes that his participation may be prohibited by paragraph (a) of this section shall report the matter and all attendant facts and circumstances to his supervisor at the level of section chief or the equivalent or higher. If the supervisor determines that a personal or political relationship exists between the employee and a person or organization described inparagraph (a) of this section, he shall relieve the employee from participation unless he determines further, in writing, after full consideration of all the facts and circumstances, that:

    (1) The relationship will not have the effect of rendering the employee's service less than fully impartial and professional; and

    (2) The employee's participation would not create an appearance of a conflict of interest likely to affect the public perception of the integrity of the investigation or prosecution.

    (c) For the purposes of this section:

    (1)Political relationship means a close identification with an elected official, a candidate (whether or not successful) for elective, public office, a political party, or a campaign organization, arising from service as a principal adviser thereto or a principal official thereof; and

    (2)Personal relationship means a close and substantial connection of the type normally viewed as likely to induce partiality. An employee is presumed to have a personal relationship with his father, mother, brother, sister, child and spouse. Whether relationships (including friendships) of an employee to other persons or organizations are “personal” must be judged on an individual basis with due regard given to the subjective opinion of the employee.

    (d) This section pertains to agency management and is not intended to create rights enforceable by private individuals or organizations.

    [Order No. 993-83, 48 FR 2319, Jan. 19, 1983. Redesignated at 61 FR 59815, Nov. 25, 1996]

    Robert Mueller's long standing personal and professional relationship with James Comey disqualifies him to act as Special Counsel.

  11. Sometimes I forget why I’m a Democrat until I hear a bunch of Democrats cheering for teddy bears and t-shirts and then I remember

  12. In the end, Mueller is a Republican. Unfortunately, he appears to be walking lock-step as much as his conscience will allow.

  13. Of course Mueller will "stick to the report", meaning the 400-plus pages you marked up and hid and misrepresented, Bill.

  14. Barr is a traitor. I wonder how many years and millions will be spent cleaning the slime off the seal of the USA after Trump, Barr, Graham, and the rest of the liars and criminals that have been lining their pockets and lying openly to the American people and lying to the world in the name of The AMERICAN people once it all comes crumbling down around Don the Con.

  15. There should be a public spectacle around Mueller's hearing. People need to be educated about what's exactly in the report and a public hearing will do just that

  16. I like Mueller.. he does his Job ..Right. For his Country. I wish I was more like Mueller. But I'm more like Comey. 😁

  17. I just think Muller is a well rounded great guy, sticks to his guns in policy never to be swayed by politics or favoritism.

  18. Barr along with Trump should be indicted for obstruction of justice. Barr is clearly going out of his way to cover for Trump like he did Bush.

  19. Wow, Mueller actually has a personality (Obama video)? And based on the videos, Mueller is NOT the man for this time/task.

  20. Everyone knows Bill Barr is a consigliere. He’s been fixing Republican criminal messes for at least 40 years.

  21. Oooooo noooo A public spectacle!! Like we haven't been watching the grandaddy of all public spectacles for the past 3 years.

  22. Mueller is an expert at talking without saying a thing.TALK ABOUT HOW HE DELETED PETER STZROCK'S TEXT MESSAGES.THAT IS SO CROOKED AND SHOWS THE WAY HE OPERATES.TWELVE ANTI-TRUMP COUNSEL.

  23. Truth isnt truth, juliany.
    Dont bealeve what you heard!! Beleave me trust me… TRUMP.

    BY THE THIS TIME TRUMP SHOULD BE IN JAIL.

  24. WE ALL hope that Mueller's testimony GETS TO YOU ALL. Mainly gets to Cadet B.S. in a big way. Probably nothing will happen and the shootings on 5th Avenue will continue with impunity.

  25. But there really was no other. You can Do what the Conspirator should have done. Mueller hands AG-Holder a blockbuster report that proves Russian interference, Holder hands it to Obama, MSNBC announces Obama is Holding A Special Hour long speech.Obama, pins Mueller for outstanding Duty. Tells the people Everything, reads some Russian Wordsb

  26. He gave you everything,All you have to do( and I know you wont, cant now since Everything in the world is on his lap.We should ashamed Party of His trashed, Trump hates him. There was only 1 group of people who should have done the Right thing.Instead I trashed, he should have Indicted him, he freed Trump….When he did so much more than he had to

  27. We turned on him because he was to honest he followed the law to closely.Somebody would have indicted him ,I still see that as our only Hope( an Impeach/Skip Pure Corruption Senate/7 million lawyers said they would indict let them prove it.If you all are not ashamed.I want you to call Obama and have him Phonr conference on TV, if we should be

  28. Ashamed, He would not try a Real War Criminal Cheney- not Bush.Cheney was a Re-born Nazi.Holder wanted to Obama said No.I want to hear Obama say The Democrats are Right. Mueller failed to put in all the details, hiw dare he follow the Doj policies,, how dare he belive the president has a right to a fairy trial and then I am sure he will say

  29. I think he was wrong in his final Decision but Do I believe that after being abused and threatened for years by Nut, Blamed and Hated for doing the RW by the Law and Order Party, and after My party has disgrace him for 2 months, non stop, and now have forced him to say what they already know they could have acted on months ago

  30. Right Decision once you have th 240-0 vote and the rumors start flying around , it s possible McConnel might allow a Trial. “He cant do that and Russia is our friend “ He has done worse. He gave the cinservates the Court for 2 generations. You will take the Evidence, which you will get because we would not allow to block anything

  31. While he Was being impeached.I am sure arrests would made.Computers confiscated, papers taken.I hope yoi will do thst

  32. Barr is more worthless than Sessions. Trump's entire corrupt little group are all faluires.
    Vote for true change.

  33. Look at all the sheeple commenting here. Think for yourselves, just because someone on tv says something…doesn’t mean it’s true. They told us for 2 years that trump was with the Russians then the report says there was no link between Trump and the Russians or any American and the Russians. The media is the enemy of the people and are the cause of the divide in this country. It’s like y’all are a bunch of donkeys chasing that carrot on a stick…you’re never going to get what you want it’s going to be just out of reach.

  34. 1) I want them to ask Mueller how it was decided to wrap up the investigation. 2) I want them to ask Mueller what would have happened if he had discovered conspiracy between trump and Russia, given that the OLC claims a president can’t be indicted. It’s not impeachment because even Barr said the DoJ does not function as an adjunct to Congress. So?

  35. Mueller's testimony is likely to end up being a nothing burger, because the Democrats will be either too stupid, or rather play politics than ask the right questions.

  36. I'm sorry, but you get sick, physically, listening to politicians lie almost constantly. That, and other, is why I come here to YouTube.

  37. Wow, leave it to Ari to dig up the cutest footage ever…between Mueller and Obama. The respect, admiration, and enthusiasm is just pouring out of Mueller as he jests with Obama during his visit to the FBI. Spectacular and graceful…::sigh::

  38. If "little billy barr" is afraid of Mr. Mueller
    he shouldn't have lied
    for "bully donny trump". He's old enough to know that when you lie, eventually you get caught. He will go to jail, because donny's
    gonna' say that "he knew nothing about billy telling lies. He had nothing to do with it. Trust me, trust me."

  39. SHAME! SHAME! SHAME! William Barr is a disgrace to his office!! He is CORRUPT, GREEDY and POWER HUNGRY!! He sold his soul to the devil (CRIMINAL, FRAUD tRump) just to have his powerful position!!! He ONCE had a career of RESPECT, HONOUR AND INTEGRITY while under the Bush administration! Now since he has joined the CORRUPT tRumpsky administration he HAS THROWN HIS RESPECTABLE CAREER DOWN THE TOILET! He should also be locked up for falsifying the Mueller Report to the American people and for being the PERSONAL ATTORNEY to tRump instead of the Attorney General for the American people that he was nominated to serve! He SHOULD HAVE HEEDED COHN’S WARNING ABOUT WHAT HAPPENS TO SOMEONE WHO IS LOYAL to tRumpsky!!💩 💩 💩 ‼️ 🤮 🤮 🤮

  40. My question for Mueller: How is Manafort and Gates discussing campaign strategy and supplying internal polling data to a Russian agent on an ongoing basis, not coordination?

  41. Well remember there is a big difference between "" sticking to the facts and not answaring questions; and given what they have shown about Mullae's past I for one cannot help wondering will he indeed try to provide congress with factual information, or will he try to dance around and avoid answaring their questions..?

  42. Barr's father was headmaster of Dalton school and employed a young Epstein as a maths teacher.. this all stinks

  43. Snap, out of habit, Barr was giving instructions to and made an offer to Mueller. Bum bum bum That's how it's done. We should have a contest to see who catches the most embedded messages in the news. That said, Mueller doesn't speculate or out his informers. This is a man of law and has been so for how many years now? He is who he is and perhaps anyone who wants to question him should keep that in mind.

  44. The Mueller Testimony will be one of the most watched television events in recent History. People threw parties and went to Bars at 9am to watch Comey give his testimony. Imagine what it’s going to be like for Mueller

  45. How is Barr encouraging him to testify in any way undercutting him? Are you stupid, is that you’re problem?

Related Post