Donald Trump Lawyer Threat On Tax Returns ‘Didn’t Really Say Anything’ | The Last Word | MSNBC


>>GOOD EVENING, AND THANKS FOR FILLING IN FOR RACHEL TONIGHT FILLING IN FOR RACHEL TONIGHT AND THANKS FOR FILLING IN FOR AND THANKS FOR FILLING IN FOR ME. ME. REALLY APPRECIATE IT. REALLY APPRECIATE IT.>>>WE’RE GOING TO HAVE ANOTHER>>>WE’RE GOING TO HAVE ANOTHER TAX CLASS TONIGHT NOW THAT THE TAX CLASS TONIGHT NOW THAT THE PRESIDENT IS DESPERATELY TRYING PRESIDENT IS DESPERATELY TRYING TO PREVENT THE IRS FROM HANDING TO PREVENT THE IRS FROM HANDING OVER HIS TAX RETURNS TO THE OVER HIS TAX RETURNS TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. IN TONIGHT’S CLASS, I’M NOT IN TONIGHT’S CLASS, I’M NOT GOING TO BE THE TEACHER. GOING TO BE THE TEACHER. I’M GOING TO BE THE STUDENT, I’M GOING TO BE THE STUDENT, BECAUSE OUR FIRST GUEST TONIGHT BECAUSE OUR FIRST GUEST TONIGHT IS THE HIGHEST AUTHORITY THAT WE IS THE HIGHEST AUTHORITY THAT WE HAVE EVER HAD ON THIS PROGRAM ON HAVE EVER HAD ON THIS PROGRAM ON TAXATION. TAXATION. GEORGE IN IS A FORMER CHIEF OF GEORGE IN IS A FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE ON STAFF OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE ON TAXATION TAXATION TAXATION. TAXATION. YOU DON’T HEAR ABOUT THAT MUCH, YOU DON’T HEAR ABOUT THAT MUCH, BUT THE JOINT COMMITTEE ON BUT THE JOINT COMMITTEE ON TAXATION IS A CONGRESSIONAL TAXATION IS A CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE COMPOSED OF HOUSE COMMITTEE COMPOSED OF HOUSE MEMBERS AND SENATE MEMBERS AND MEMBERS AND SENATE MEMBERS AND THE STAFF OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE THE STAFF OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE ACTUALLY ADVISES THE TWO TAX ACTUALLY ADVISES THE TWO TAX WRITING COMMITTEES AND THEIR WRITING COMMITTEES AND THEIR STAFF, THE SENATE FINANCE STAFF, THE SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE AND THE HOUSE WAYS AND COMMITTEE AND THE HOUSE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE, AND THE STAFF MEANS COMMITTEE, AND THE STAFF OF THE JOINT TAX COMMITTEE ARE OF THE JOINT TAX COMMITTEE ARE BY FAR THE LEADING EXPERTS ON BY FAR THE LEADING EXPERTS ON TAXATION IN WASHINGTON AND THE TAXATION IN WASHINGTON AND THE CHIEF OF STAFF OF THAT STAFF ON CHIEF OF STAFF OF THAT STAFF ON THE JOINT TAX COMMITTEE IS THE JOINT TAX COMMITTEE IS SIMPLY REGARDED IN AWE BY ALL SIMPLY REGARDED IN AWE BY ALL MEMBERS OF THE STAFF OF THE TAX MEMBERS OF THE STAFF OF THE TAX WRITING COMMITTEES. WRITING COMMITTEES. AND SO I AM FILLED WITH AWE AND SO I AM FILLED WITH AWE TONIGHT AND VERY EXCITED TO HAVE TONIGHT AND VERY EXCITED TO HAVE GEORGE YIN WITH US TONIGHT. GEORGE YIN WITH US TONIGHT. HE WAS ACTUALLY HIRED BY HE WAS ACTUALLY HIRED BY REPUBLICANS TO RUN THE STAFF OF REPUBLICANS TO RUN THE STAFF OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE ON TAXATION. THE JOINT COMMITTEE ON TAXATION. THERE IS USUALLY DEPENDING ON THERE IS USUALLY DEPENDING ON WHICH PARTY IS IN POWER, WHICH PARTY IS IN POWER, DEMOCRATIC CHAIRMAN OF THAT DEMOCRATIC CHAIRMAN OF THAT COMMITTEE OR A REPUBLICAN COMMITTEE OR A REPUBLICAN CHAIRMAN OF THAT COMMITTEE, IT CHAIRMAN OF THAT COMMITTEE, IT WAS ALWAYS A REPUBLICAN IN WAS ALWAYS A REPUBLICAN IN GEORGE YIN’S TIME, BUT THE STAFF GEORGE YIN’S TIME, BUT THE STAFF OF THAT COMMITTEE IS ALWAYS OF THAT COMMITTEE IS ALWAYS CONSIDERED NONPARTISAN. CONSIDERED NONPARTISAN. IT ISN’T EVEN BIPARTISAN. IT ISN’T EVEN BIPARTISAN. THEY’RE NONPARTISAN, THEY ARE THEY’RE NONPARTISAN, THEY ARE COMPLETELY TRUSTED BY BOTH COMPLETELY TRUSTED BY BOTH SIDES. SIDES. AND GEORGE YIN HAS ACTUALLY AND GEORGE YIN HAS ACTUALLY WRITTEN THE DEFINITIVE ARTICLE WRITTEN THE DEFINITIVE ARTICLE ON THE TAX WRITING COMMITTEE’S ON THE TAX WRITING COMMITTEE’S LEGAL AUTHORITY TO OBTAIN THE LEGAL AUTHORITY TO OBTAIN THE PRESIDENT’S TAX RETURNS, AND SO PRESIDENT’S TAX RETURNS, AND SO YOU ARE GOING TO HEAR FROM THE YOU ARE GOING TO HEAR FROM THE HIGHEST AUTHORITY IN THE LAND ON HIGHEST AUTHORITY IN THE LAND ON THIS ISSUE TONIGHT, AND I’M THIS ISSUE TONIGHT, AND I’M GOING TO BE TAKING NOTES, AND GOING TO BE TAKING NOTES, AND LATER IN THIS HOUR, WE’RE GOING LATER IN THIS HOUR, WE’RE GOING IT HEAR FROM THE NEWEST IT HEAR FROM THE NEWEST DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE IN OUR CONTENDERS CANDIDATE IN OUR CONTENDERS SERIES TONIGHT, WE WILL BE SERIES TONIGHT, WE WILL BE JOINED BY DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS JOINED BY DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS MA’AMCONGRESSMAN MA’AMCONGRESSMAN TIM RAY YANRYAN OF OHIO AND IN T TIM RAY YANRYAN OF OHIO AND IN T LAZY LABELS OF THE POLITICAL LAZY LABELS OF THE POLITICAL NEWS MEDIA TIM RYAN IS OFTEN NEWS MEDIA TIM RYAN IS OFTEN REFERRED TO AS A MODERATE. REFERRED TO AS A MODERATE. I DON’T KNOW WHAT MODERATE MEANS I DON’T KNOW WHAT MODERATE MEANS ANYMORE. ANYMORE. TIM RYAN IS IN FAVOR OF MEDICARE TIM RYAN IS IN FAVOR OF MEDICARE FOR ALL WHICH WAS A SHORT TIME FOR ALL WHICH WAS A SHORT TIME AGO THE MOST EXTREME LIB CAL AGO THE MOST EXTREME LIB CAL POSITION YOU COULD TAKE IN POSITION YOU COULD TAKE IN CONGRESS. CONGRESS. YOU MAY BE SURPRISED BY SOME OF YOU MAY BE SURPRISED BY SOME OF TIM RYAN’S POSITIONS. TIM RYAN’S POSITIONS. REMEMBER, THERE ARE TWO SLOTS REMEMBER, THERE ARE TWO SLOTS THAT HAVE TO BE FILLED AT THE THAT HAVE TO BE FILLED AT THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL CONVENTION, DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL CONVENTION, PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENTS. PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENTS. WE NEED TWO CANDIDATES, AND IT’S WE NEED TWO CANDIDATES, AND IT’S NEVER TOO EARLY TO START LOOKING NEVER TOO EARLY TO START LOOKING FOR A VICE PRESIDENTIAL FOR A VICE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE WHO CAN MAYBE HELP THE CANDIDATE WHO CAN MAYBE HELP THE TICKET WIN IN A VERY IMPORTANT TICKET WIN IN A VERY IMPORTANT STATE LIKE SAY OHIO. STATE LIKE SAY OHIO. SO YOU’RE GOING TO WANT TO HEAR SO YOU’RE GOING TO WANT TO HEAR FROM MR. RYAN OF OHIO TONIGHT. FROM MR. RYAN OF OHIO TONIGHT.>>>BUT FIRST, DONALD TRUMP HAS>>>BUT FIRST, DONALD TRUMP HAS A NEW LAWYER, AND THAT LAWYER IS A NEW LAWYER, AND THAT LAWYER IS TRYING TO DO SOMETHING THAT HAS TRYING TO DO SOMETHING THAT HAS NEVER BEEN DONE BEFORE, AND THE NEVER BEEN DONE BEFORE, AND THE REASON IT’S NEVER BEEN DONE REASON IT’S NEVER BEEN DONE BEFORE IS THAT THE LAW IS VERY BEFORE IS THAT THE LAW IS VERY CLEAR ABOUT THE CASE THAT CLEAR ABOUT THE CASE THAT PRESIDENT TRUMP HAS HIRED HIS PRESIDENT TRUMP HAS HIRED HIS NEW LAWYER TO HANDLE, AND IT MAY NEW LAWYER TO HANDLE, AND IT MAY BE THE CASE THAT DONALD TRUMP BE THE CASE THAT DONALD TRUMP FEARS MORE THAN ANY OTHER THING FEARS MORE THAN ANY OTHER THING THAT HAS HAPPENED TO HIM SINCE THAT HAS HAPPENED TO HIM SINCE HE TOOK THE OATH OF OFFICE. HE TOOK THE OATH OF OFFICE. THE PRESIDENT’S NEW LAWYER IS A THE PRESIDENT’S NEW LAWYER IS A PRIVATE ATTORNEY WHO DOES NOT PRIVATE ATTORNEY WHO DOES NOT WORK IN THE WHITE HOUSE. WORK IN THE WHITE HOUSE. HE IS NOT ON THE GOVERNMENT HE IS NOT ON THE GOVERNMENT PAYROLL. PAYROLL. HE’S A PRIVATE LAWYER HIRED BY HE’S A PRIVATE LAWYER HIRED BY DONALD TRUMP TO TRY TO STOP DONALD TRUMP TO TRY TO STOP HOUSE WAYS AND MEANS CHAIRMAN HOUSE WAYS AND MEANS CHAIRMAN RICHARD NEAL FROM LEGALLY RICHARD NEAL FROM LEGALLY OBTAINING DONALD TRUMP’S TAX OBTAINING DONALD TRUMP’S TAX RETURNS, AS WE’VE BEEN RETURNS, AS WE’VE BEEN DISCUSSING AT THIS HOUR FOR THE DISCUSSING AT THIS HOUR FOR THE LAST TWO NIGHTS, THE CHAIRMAN OF LAST TWO NIGHTS, THE CHAIRMAN OF THE HOUSE WAYS AND MEANS THE HOUSE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE HAS THE UNIQUE POWER COMMITTEE HAS THE UNIQUE POWER THAT ALLOWS HIM TO OBTAIN THAT ALLOWS HIM TO OBTAIN ANYONE’S TAX RETURNS, AND ANYONE’S TAX RETURNS, AND OBTAINING PUBLIC OFFICIAL’S TAX OBTAINING PUBLIC OFFICIAL’S TAX RETURNS INCLUDING THE PRESIDENT RETURNS INCLUDING THE PRESIDENT IS ONE OF THE THINGS THAT THIS IS ONE OF THE THINGS THAT THIS LAW WAS ACTUALLY DESIGNED TO DO. LAW WAS ACTUALLY DESIGNED TO DO. THE LAW ALLOWS THE CHAIRMAN OF THE LAW ALLOWS THE CHAIRMAN OF THE TAX WRITING COMMITTEES IN THE TAX WRITING COMMITTEES IN THE HOUSE AND IN THE SENATE TO THE HOUSE AND IN THE SENATE TO OBTAIN ANY TAX RETURNS THEY WANT OBTAIN ANY TAX RETURNS THEY WANT TO SEE, AND NO ONE HAS EVER TO SEE, AND NO ONE HAS EVER SUCCESSFULLY BLOCKED THEM FROM SUCCESSFULLY BLOCKED THEM FROM DOING THAT, EVER. DOING THAT, EVER. THE PRESIDENT’S NEW LAWYER, THE PRESIDENT’S NEW LAWYER, WILLIAM CONSOVOY WROTE A WILLIAM CONSOVOY WROTE A THREE-PAGE LETTER TRYING TO THREE-PAGE LETTER TRYING TO BLOCK CHAIRMAN’S DEMAND FOR THE BLOCK CHAIRMAN’S DEMAND FOR THE PRESIDENT’S TAX RETURNS. PRESIDENT’S TAX RETURNS. IT COULD HAVE BEEN A MUCH IT COULD HAVE BEEN A MUCH SHORTER LETTER IF ANYONE HAD SHORTER LETTER IF ANYONE HAD EVER SUCCESSFULLY BLOCKED ONE OF EVER SUCCESSFULLY BLOCKED ONE OF THE TAX WRITING COMMITTEES FROM THE TAX WRITING COMMITTEES FROM OBTAINING A TAX RETURN. OBTAINING A TAX RETURN. IF THAT HAPPENED THE PRESIDENT’S IF THAT HAPPENED THE PRESIDENT’S LAWYER COULD JUST CITE THAT LAWYER COULD JUST CITE THAT CASE, CLAIM IT APPLIES HERE AND CASE, CLAIM IT APPLIES HERE AND BE DONE WITH IT. BE DONE WITH IT. INSTEAD THE PRESIDENT’S LAWYER INSTEAD THE PRESIDENT’S LAWYER WROTE A LETTER FILLED WITH WROTE A LETTER FILLED WITH IRRELEVANT REFERENCES, POLITICAL IRRELEVANT REFERENCES, POLITICAL ARGUMENT, AND FAULTY LEGAL ARGUMENT, AND FAULTY LEGAL SCHOLARSHIP. SCHOLARSHIP. IN OTHER WORDS, THE PRESIDENT IN OTHER WORDS, THE PRESIDENT HAS HIRED YET ANOTHER LAWYER WHO HAS HIRED YET ANOTHER LAWYER WHO LITERALLY DOESN’T KNOW WHAT HE’S LITERALLY DOESN’T KNOW WHAT HE’S TALKING ABOUT. TALKING ABOUT. BUT THE PRESIDENT IS DESPERATE BUT THE PRESIDENT IS DESPERATE THIS TIME BECAUSE THERE IS THIS TIME BECAUSE THERE IS NOTHING THE PRESIDENT HAS WORKED NOTHING THE PRESIDENT HAS WORKED HARDER TO HIDE THAN HIS TAX HARDER TO HIDE THAN HIS TAX RETURNS. RETURNS. NOTHING. NOTHING. THE PRESIDENT IS HAPPILY LIVING THE PRESIDENT IS HAPPILY LIVING WITH THE PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE AND WITH THE PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE AND HIS WIFE’S KNOWLEDGE OF HIS HIS WIFE’S KNOWLEDGE OF HIS AFFAIR WITH STORMY DANIELS AFFAIR WITH STORMY DANIELS SHORTLY AFTER HIS WIFE GAVE SHORTLY AFTER HIS WIFE GAVE BIRTH. BIRTH. THE PRESIDENT WAS HOPING WE THE PRESIDENT WAS HOPING WE DIDN’T FIND OUT ABOUT THAT, BUT DIDN’T FIND OUT ABOUT THAT, BUT HE SURE DOESN’T SEEM TO CARE HE SURE DOESN’T SEEM TO CARE THAT WE DID. THAT WE DID. HIS TAX RETURNS ARE SOMETHING HIS TAX RETURNS ARE SOMETHING ELSE. ELSE. TIM O’BRIEN IS A FREQUENT GUEST TIM O’BRIEN IS A FREQUENT GUEST ON THIS PROGRAM WHO HAS BEEN ON THIS PROGRAM WHO HAS BEEN STUDYING DONALD TRUMP’S STUDYING DONALD TRUMP’S FINANCIAL AFFAIRS FOR YEARS, AND FINANCIAL AFFAIRS FOR YEARS, AND AS A RESULT OF A LAWSUIT WAS AS A RESULT OF A LAWSUIT WAS ONCE ALLOWED TO SEE ONE YEAR OF ONCE ALLOWED TO SEE ONE YEAR OF DONALD TRUMP’S TAX RETURNS WHEN DONALD TRUMP’S TAX RETURNS WHEN HE WAS A “NEW YORK TIMES” HE WAS A “NEW YORK TIMES” REPORTER. REPORTER. TODAY TIM O’BRIEN SAID THIS, TODAY TIM O’BRIEN SAID THIS, THIS IS SOMETHING HE IS GOING TO THIS IS SOMETHING HE IS GOING TO FIGHT TOOTH AND NAIL. FIGHT TOOTH AND NAIL. IT OPENS A VEIN. IT OPENS A VEIN. HE’S THE MOST FINANCIALLY HE’S THE MOST FINANCIALLY CONFLICTED PRESIDENT OF THE CONFLICTED PRESIDENT OF THE MODERN ERA. MODERN ERA. THE TAX RETURNS ARE BOTH THE TAX RETURNS ARE BOTH EMBLEMATIC OF THAT AND A EMBLEMATIC OF THAT AND A POTENTIAL ROAD MAP OF WHAT HIS POTENTIAL ROAD MAP OF WHAT HIS CONFLICTS MIGHT LOOK LIKE. CONFLICTS MIGHT LOOK LIKE. BECAUSE LIKE MOST PEOPLE MOST OF BECAUSE LIKE MOST PEOPLE MOST OF THE NEWS MEDIA IS USUALLY THE NEWS MEDIA IS USUALLY INTIMIDATED BY LAWYER’S LETTERS, INTIMIDATED BY LAWYER’S LETTERS, YOU SHOULD BRACE YOURSELF FOR YOU SHOULD BRACE YOURSELF FOR DAYS OF NEWS COVERAGE IN WHICH DAYS OF NEWS COVERAGE IN WHICH THE PRESIDENT’S LAWYER’S LETTER THE PRESIDENT’S LAWYER’S LETTER WILL BE TAKEN MUCH MORE WILL BE TAKEN MUCH MORE SERIOUSLY THAN IT SHOULD BE. SERIOUSLY THAN IT SHOULD BE. IT TAKES ITS PLACE AMONG THE IT TAKES ITS PLACE AMONG THE LONG LIST OF LAWYERS’ LETTERS LONG LIST OF LAWYERS’ LETTERS SENT ON BEHALF OF DONALD J. SENT ON BEHALF OF DONALD J. TRUMP THAT HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO TRUMP THAT HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO LEGAL BASIS, LIKE THE LETTER LEGAL BASIS, LIKE THE LETTER ANOTHER PRIVATE ATTORNEY SENT ON ANOTHER PRIVATE ATTORNEY SENT ON BEHALF OF PRESIDENT TRUMP TO BEHALF OF PRESIDENT TRUMP TO BLOCK THE PUBLICATION OF MICHAEL BLOCK THE PUBLICATION OF MICHAEL WOLF’S BOOK “FIRE AND FURY.” WOLF’S BOOK “FIRE AND FURY.” CHARLES HEARTER HAS HAD A VERY CHARLES HEARTER HAS HAD A VERY SUCCESSFUL LAW PRACTICE IN SUCCESSFUL LAW PRACTICE IN BEVERLY HILLS, BUT HIS PLACE IN BEVERLY HILLS, BUT HIS PLACE IN THE LEGAL HALL OF FAME BECAME THE LEGAL HALL OF FAME BECAME SECURE ON JANUARY 4th, 2018 WHEN SECURE ON JANUARY 4th, 2018 WHEN HE WROTE THIS LETTER TO MICHAEL HE WROTE THIS LETTER TO MICHAEL WOLF AND HIS PUBLISHER SAYING ON WOLF AND HIS PUBLISHER SAYING ON PAGE 3, MR. TRUMP HEREBY DEMANDS PAGE 3, MR. TRUMP HEREBY DEMANDS THAT YOU IMMEDIATELY CEASE AND THAT YOU IMMEDIATELY CEASE AND DESIST FROM ANY FURTHER DESIST FROM ANY FURTHER PUBLICATION RELEASED OR PUBLICATION RELEASED OR DISSEMINATION OF THE BOOK. DISSEMINATION OF THE BOOK. AND OF COURSE THE BOOK WENT ON AND OF COURSE THE BOOK WENT ON TO BE A GIANT BEST SELLER. TO BE A GIANT BEST SELLER. THAT WAS ONE LAWYER’S LETTER THAT WAS ONE LAWYER’S LETTER THAT EVERYONE IN THE NEWS MEDIA THAT EVERYONE IN THE NEWS MEDIA INSTANTLY KNEW WAS A JOKE INSTANTLY KNEW WAS A JOKE BECAUSE IT AFFECTS THEIR BECAUSE IT AFFECTS THEIR BUSINESS. BUSINESS. THEY KNOW THAT THE FIRST THEY KNOW THAT THE FIRST AMENDMENT MADE THAT LETTER A AMENDMENT MADE THAT LETTER A JOKE AND HELPED MICHAEL WOLF’S JOKE AND HELPED MICHAEL WOLF’S BOOK SALES SKYROCKET. BOOK SALES SKYROCKET. IT WAS AN 11-PAGE LETTER BY ONE IT WAS AN 11-PAGE LETTER BY ONE OF THE MOST EXPENSIVE LAWYERS IN OF THE MOST EXPENSIVE LAWYERS IN AMERICA, AND IT MEANT ABSOLUTELY AMERICA, AND IT MEANT ABSOLUTELY NOTHING, AND EVERYBODY REALIZED NOTHING, AND EVERYBODY REALIZED THAT. THAT. AND THERE WAS NO FOLLOW-UP TO AND THERE WAS NO FOLLOW-UP TO THAT LETTER, NONE. THAT LETTER, NONE. THE THREE-PAGE LETTER THAT THE THE THREE-PAGE LETTER THAT THE PRESIDENT PAID FOR TODAY MUST PRESIDENT PAID FOR TODAY MUST HAVE BEEN MUCH CHEAPER AND EVEN HAVE BEEN MUCH CHEAPER AND EVEN THOUGH IT HAS NO LEGAL BASIS, THOUGH IT HAS NO LEGAL BASIS, THIS ONE, THIS ONE IS NOT A JOKE THIS ONE, THIS ONE IS NOT A JOKE BECAUSE IT IS ADDRESSED TO A BECAUSE IT IS ADDRESSED TO A TRUMP APPOINTEE, BRENT McINTOSH, TRUMP APPOINTEE, BRENT McINTOSH, THE GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE THE GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, AND THE DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, AND THE LETTER ASKS THE GENERAL COUNSEL LETTER ASKS THE GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE TREASURY TO TELL THE OF THE TREASURY TO TELL THE TREASURY SECRETARY TO NOT ALLOW TREASURY SECRETARY TO NOT ALLOW THE IRS COMMISSIONER TO DELIVER THE IRS COMMISSIONER TO DELIVER THE TRUMP TAX RETURNS TO THE TRUMP TAX RETURNS TO CHAIRMAN NEIL. CHAIRMAN NEIL. THE IRS IS TECHNICALLY PART OF THE IRS IS TECHNICALLY PART OF THE TREASURY DEPARTMENT, AND SO THE TREASURY DEPARTMENT, AND SO IT IS TECHNICALLY UNDER THE IT IS TECHNICALLY UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE TREASURY JURISDICTION OF THE TREASURY SECRETARY, ALTHOUGH THE IRS IS SECRETARY, ALTHOUGH THE IRS IS USUALLY ALLOWED TO OPERATE AS A USUALLY ALLOWED TO OPERATE AS A COMPLETELY INDEPENDENT ENTITY. COMPLETELY INDEPENDENT ENTITY. THE LETTER SAYS THE IRS SHOULD THE LETTER SAYS THE IRS SHOULD REFRAIN FROM DIVULGEING THE REFRAIN FROM DIVULGEING THE REQUESTED INFORMATION UNTIL IT REQUESTED INFORMATION UNTIL IT RECEIVES A FORMAL LEGAL OPINION RECEIVES A FORMAL LEGAL OPINION FROM THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT’S FROM THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT’S OFFICE OF LEGAL COUNSEL, WHICH OFFICE OF LEGAL COUNSEL, WHICH BRINGS US TO ANOTHER TRUMP BRINGS US TO ANOTHER TRUMP APPOINTEE, ATTORNEY GENERAL APPOINTEE, ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR, AND SO THIS WILLIAM BARR, AND SO THIS BECOMES ANOTHER TEST OF WHAT BECOMES ANOTHER TEST OF WHAT ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR IS ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR IS WILLING TO DO FOR DONALD TRUMP, WILLING TO DO FOR DONALD TRUMP, BUT IT BECOMES A TEST FOR DONALD BUT IT BECOMES A TEST FOR DONALD TRUMP’S COMMISSIONER OF THE IRS TRUMP’S COMMISSIONER OF THE IRS WHO HAS ABSOLUTELY NO LEGAL WHO HAS ABSOLUTELY NO LEGAL BASIS WHATSOEVER FOR NOT TURNING BASIS WHATSOEVER FOR NOT TURNING OVER THOSE TAX RETURNS BY OVER THOSE TAX RETURNS BY WEDNESDAY OF NEXT WEEK AS WEDNESDAY OF NEXT WEEK AS CHAIRMAN NEIL HAS DEMANDED. CHAIRMAN NEIL HAS DEMANDED. AND SO ALL THE DONALD TRUMP AND SO ALL THE DONALD TRUMP APPOINTEES INVOLVED, TREASURY APPOINTEES INVOLVED, TREASURY SECRETARY MNUCHIN, BRENT SECRETARY MNUCHIN, BRENT McINTOSH, THE GENERAL COUNSEL OF McINTOSH, THE GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE TREASURY. THE TREASURY. ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR, ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR, IRS COMMISSIONER CHARLES REDDICK IRS COMMISSIONER CHARLES REDDICK MIGHT ALL BE STARING AT DONALD MIGHT ALL BE STARING AT DONALD TRUMP’S LAWYER’S LETTER TONIGHT TRUMP’S LAWYER’S LETTER TONIGHT RIGHT NOW TRYING TO SEE IF THERE RIGHT NOW TRYING TO SEE IF THERE IS ANY LEGAL HOOK THEY CAN IS ANY LEGAL HOOK THEY CAN POSSIBLY HOLD ONTO AS AN EXCUSE POSSIBLY HOLD ONTO AS AN EXCUSE FOR NOT COMPLYING WITH VERY FOR NOT COMPLYING WITH VERY CLEAR LAW, OR THEY MIGHT NOT. CLEAR LAW, OR THEY MIGHT NOT. THEY MIGHT ALL BE HONORABLE MEN THEY MIGHT ALL BE HONORABLE MEN WHO HAPPEN TO BE APPOINTED BY WHO HAPPEN TO BE APPOINTED BY DONALD TRUMP WHO TAKE THEIR DONALD TRUMP WHO TAKE THEIR OATHS OF OFFICE VERY SERIOUSLY OATHS OF OFFICE VERY SERIOUSLY ASK RECOGNIZE THAT THE ASK RECOGNIZE THAT THE PRESIDENT’S LAWYERS LETTER IS A PRESIDENT’S LAWYERS LETTER IS A LEGAL JOKE TO BE DISMISSED AS LEGAL JOKE TO BE DISMISSED AS SOON AS THEY READ IT. SOON AS THEY READ IT. MAYBE. MAYBE. THE LAWYER’S LETTER SAYS THE LAWYER’S LETTER SAYS REQUESTS FOR TAX RETURNS AND REQUESTS FOR TAX RETURNS AND RETURN INFORMATION MUST HAVE A RETURN INFORMATION MUST HAVE A LEGITIMATE LEGISLATIVE PURPOSE. LEGITIMATE LEGISLATIVE PURPOSE. CHAIRMAN NEIL’S LETTER DEMANDING CHAIRMAN NEIL’S LETTER DEMANDING THE TAX RETURNS SAYS CONSISTENT THE TAX RETURNS SAYS CONSISTENT WITH ITS AUTHORITY THE COMMITTEE WITH ITS AUTHORITY THE COMMITTEE IS CONSIDERING LEGISLATIVE IS CONSIDERING LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS AND CONDUCTING PROPOSALS AND CONDUCTING OVERSIGHT RELATED TO OUR FEDERAL OVERSIGHT RELATED TO OUR FEDERAL TAX LAWS INCLUDING BUT NOT TAX LAWS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE EXTENT TO WHICH LIMITED TO THE EXTENT TO WHICH THE IRS AUDITS AND ENFORCES THE THE IRS AUDITS AND ENFORCES THE FEDERAL TAX LAWS AGAINST A FEDERAL TAX LAWS AGAINST A PRESIDENT. PRESIDENT. IT IS NECESSARY FOR THE IT IS NECESSARY FOR THE COMMITTEE TO DETERMINE THE SCOPE COMMITTEE TO DETERMINE THE SCOPE OF ANY SUCH EXAMINATION AND OF ANY SUCH EXAMINATION AND WHETHER IT INCLUDES A REVIEW OF WHETHER IT INCLUDES A REVIEW OF UNDERLYING BUSINESS ACTIVITIES UNDERLYING BUSINESS ACTIVITIES REQUIRED TO BE REPORTED ON THE REQUIRED TO BE REPORTED ON THE INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX RETURN. INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX RETURN. AND THAT IS WHY THE CHAIRMAN IS AND THAT IS WHY THE CHAIRMAN IS ASKING FOR DONALD TRUMP’S TAX ASKING FOR DONALD TRUMP’S TAX RETURNS INSTEAD OF BARACK RETURNS INSTEAD OF BARACK OBAMA’S TAX RETURNS BECAUSE OBAMA’S TAX RETURNS BECAUSE DONALD TRUMP IS THE ONLY DONALD TRUMP IS THE ONLY PRESIDENT WHO HAS SIGNIFICANT PRESIDENT WHO HAS SIGNIFICANT UNDERLYING BUSINESS ACTIVITIES. UNDERLYING BUSINESS ACTIVITIES. THE CHAIRMAN WANTS TO KNOW THE CHAIRMAN WANTS TO KNOW WHETHER THE AUTOMATIC IRS AUDIT WHETHER THE AUTOMATIC IRS AUDIT OF PRESIDENTIAL TAX RETURNS OF PRESIDENTIAL TAX RETURNS INCLUDES DONALD TRUMP’S BUSINESS INCLUDES DONALD TRUMP’S BUSINESS TAX RETURNS. TAX RETURNS. THE PRESIDENT’S LAWYER’S LETTER THE PRESIDENT’S LAWYER’S LETTER CLAIMS THAT CHAIRMAN NEAL IS CLAIMS THAT CHAIRMAN NEAL IS ONLY ASKING FOR DONALD TRUMP’S ONLY ASKING FOR DONALD TRUMP’S TAX RETURNS BECAUSE HE IS A TAX RETURNS BECAUSE HE IS A POLITICAL OPPONENT. POLITICAL OPPONENT. THE LETTER MAKES NO ATTEMPT TO THE LETTER MAKES NO ATTEMPT TO PROVE THAT, AND THE LETTER DOES PROVE THAT, AND THE LETTER DOES THAT CLASSIC BAD LAWYERING THING THAT CLASSIC BAD LAWYERING THING SAYING THE CHAIRMAN HAS NO SAYING THE CHAIRMAN HAS NO LEGITIMATE PURPOSE FOR LEGITIMATE PURPOSE FOR REQUESTING THE PRESIDENT’S TAX REQUESTING THE PRESIDENT’S TAX RETURNS, AND THEN IMMEDIATELY RETURNS, AND THEN IMMEDIATELY SAYS EVEN IF THE WAYS AND MEANS SAYS EVEN IF THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE HAS A LEGITIMATE COMMITTEE HAS A LEGITIMATE PURPOSE FOR REQUESTING THE PURPOSE FOR REQUESTING THE PRESIDENT’S TAX RETURNS, THAT’S PRESIDENT’S TAX RETURNS, THAT’S NOT THE REAL REASON RICHIE NEAL NOT THE REAL REASON RICHIE NEAL IS DOING THIS. IS DOING THIS. THE LETTER SAYS THE PRESIDENT’S THE LETTER SAYS THE PRESIDENT’S LAWYER DOES NOT BELIEVE THE LAWYER DOES NOT BELIEVE THE REASONS RICHIE NEAL GAVE FOR REASONS RICHIE NEAL GAVE FOR DEMANDING THE PRESIDENT’S TAX DEMANDING THE PRESIDENT’S TAX RETURNS. RETURNS. THE P PRESIDENT’S LAWYER’S THE P PRESIDENT’S LAWYER’S LETTER ALSO INCLUDES THIS LETTER ALSO INCLUDES THIS GLARING MISTAKE. GLARING MISTAKE. IT SAYS THE PRESIDENT HAS EVEN IT SAYS THE PRESIDENT HAS EVEN GREATER AUTHORITY THAN CONGRESS GREATER AUTHORITY THAN CONGRESS TO OBTAIN INDIVIDUAL’S TAX TO OBTAIN INDIVIDUAL’S TAX RETURNS. RETURNS. THAT IS NOT TRUE. THAT IS NOT TRUE. THE PRESIDENT DOES NOT HAVE THE PRESIDENT DOES NOT HAVE AUTHORITY TO OBTAIN INDIVIDUAL’S AUTHORITY TO OBTAIN INDIVIDUAL’S TAX RETURNS THAT IS MORE TAX RETURNS THAT IS MORE POWERFUL THAN THE CONGRESS’S. POWERFUL THAN THE CONGRESS’S. IT IS ACTUALLY MUCH MORE LIMITED IT IS ACTUALLY MUCH MORE LIMITED THAN COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN’S THAN COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN’S AUTHORITY TO OBTAIN INDIVIDUAL AUTHORITY TO OBTAIN INDIVIDUAL TAX RETURNS. TAX RETURNS. RICHIE NEAL IS IN HIS 30th YEAR RICHIE NEAL IS IN HIS 30th YEAR OF SERVICE IN THE HOUSE OF OF SERVICE IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES WHERE EVERYONE REPRESENTATIVES WHERE EVERYONE CALLS HIM RUCH CHIICHIE JUST LIK CALLS HIM RUCH CHIICHIE JUST LIK DO BACK HOME. DO BACK HOME. HE’S NOT CHAIRMAN NEAL BACK HE’S NOT CHAIRMAN NEAL BACK THERE, HE’S RICHIE NEAL AND HE THERE, HE’S RICHIE NEAL AND HE WAS RICHIE NEAL ME TO ME WHEN I WAS RICHIE NEAL ME TO ME WHEN I WAS WORKING ON TAX POLICY AND HE WAS WORKING ON TAX POLICY AND HE WAS A MEMBER OF THE WAYS AND WAS A MEMBER OF THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE WORKING ON TAX MEANS COMMITTEE WORKING ON TAX POLICY. POLICY. MOST OF YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD HIS MOST OF YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD HIS VOICE. VOICE. HIS APPROACH HAS ALWAYS BEEN HIS APPROACH HAS ALWAYS BEEN ABOUT CAREFULLY DOING THE WORK ABOUT CAREFULLY DOING THE WORK AND THE HOMEWORK INCLUDING AND THE HOMEWORK INCLUDING CAREFULLY DOING THE WORK FOR HIS CAREFULLY DOING THE WORK FOR HIS CONSTITUENTS IN WESTERN CONSTITUENTS IN WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS SO THAT HE IS MASSACHUSETTS SO THAT HE IS ALWAYS REELECTED BUT NEVER ALWAYS REELECTED BUT NEVER SEEKING THE LIMELIGHT IN SEEKING THE LIMELIGHT IN WASHINGTON. WASHINGTON. RICHIE NEAL HAS HAD AN OPEN RICHIE NEAL HAS HAD AN OPEN INVITATION TO BE ON THIS PROGRAM INVITATION TO BE ON THIS PROGRAM EVERY NIGHT SINCE THE DEMOCRATS EVERY NIGHT SINCE THE DEMOCRATS WON THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVE, WON THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVE, AND FULL DISCLOSURE I THINK OF AND FULL DISCLOSURE I THINK OF HIM AS A FRIEND OF MINE, AND HE HIM AS A FRIEND OF MINE, AND HE WON’T DO THIS SHOW BECAUSE HE WON’T DO THIS SHOW BECAUSE HE DOESN’T WANT OR NEED THE DOESN’T WANT OR NEED THE ATTENTION. ATTENTION. RICHIE NEAL IS THE OPPOSITE OF RICHIE NEAL IS THE OPPOSITE OF DONALD TRUMP IN EVERY GOOD WAY DONALD TRUMP IN EVERY GOOD WAY THAT YOU CAN BE THE OPPOSITE OF THAT YOU CAN BE THE OPPOSITE OF DONALD TRUMP, AND TONIGHT DONALD DONALD TRUMP, AND TONIGHT DONALD TRUMP HAS NO IDEA WHAT HE’S UP TRUMP HAS NO IDEA WHAT HE’S UP AGAINST IN RICHIE NEAL, BUT I, AGAINST IN RICHIE NEAL, BUT I, FOR ONE, HAVE NO DOUBT WHO IS FOR ONE, HAVE NO DOUBT WHO IS GOING TO WIN. GOING TO WIN. RICHIE NEAL IS GOING TO GET RICHIE NEAL IS GOING TO GET DONALD TRUMP’S TAX RETURNS. DONALD TRUMP’S TAX RETURNS. LEADING OFF OUR DISCUSSION NOW LEADING OFF OUR DISCUSSION NOW IT IS AN HONOR TO BE JOINED BY IT IS AN HONOR TO BE JOINED BY GEORGE YIN, THE FORMER CHIEF OF GEORGE YIN, THE FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE ON STAFF OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE ON TAKE TAKE TAXATION, AND ALSO JOINING US TAXATION, AND ALSO JOINING US DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSMAN JIMMY DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSMAN JIMMY GOMEZ. GOMEZ. HE IS NOW A MEMBER OF THE HOUSE HE IS NOW A MEMBER OF THE HOUSE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE, ALSO A WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE, ALSO A MEMBER OF THE OVERSIGHT MEMBER OF THE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE. COMMITTEE. HOST A MEMBER OF THE HOUSE WAYS HOST A MEMBER OF THE HOUSE WAYS AND MEANS WHERE THIS DEMAND FOR AND MEANS WHERE THIS DEMAND FOR DONALD TRUMP’S TAX RETURNS DONALD TRUMP’S TAX RETURNS ORIGINATED. ORIGINATED. GEORGE YIN, LET ME START WITH GEORGE YIN, LET ME START WITH YOU. YOU. YOU’VE READ THE PRESIDENT’S YOU’VE READ THE PRESIDENT’S ATTORNEY’S LETTER ABOUT THIS. ATTORNEY’S LETTER ABOUT THIS. YOU’VE ALSO WRITTEN THE YOU’VE ALSO WRITTEN THE DEFINITIVE ARTICLE ABOUT THIS DEFINITIVE ARTICLE ABOUT THIS LAW. LAW. TELL US, GIVE US YOUR REVIEW OF TELL US, GIVE US YOUR REVIEW OF THE PRESIDENT’S LAWYER’S LETTER, THE PRESIDENT’S LAWYER’S LETTER, AND DO YOU SEE ANY MERIT IN IT? AND DO YOU SEE ANY MERIT IN IT?>>THANKS, LAWRENCE, PLEASURE TO>>THANKS, LAWRENCE, PLEASURE TO BE WITH YOU. BE WITH YOU. THAT WAS AN OVER THE TOP THAT WAS AN OVER THE TOP INTRODUCTION. INTRODUCTION.>>LET ME JUST STOP YOU, YOU>>LET ME JUST STOP YOU, YOU KNOW AND JIMMY GOMEZ KNOWS KNOW AND JIMMY GOMEZ KNOWS EXACTLY HOW US FORMER AND EXACTLY HOW US FORMER AND CURRENT TAX COMMITTEE STAFF CURRENT TAX COMMITTEE STAFF REGARD THE CHIEF OF STAFF OF THE REGARD THE CHIEF OF STAFF OF THE JOINT TAX COMMITTEE. JOINT TAX COMMITTEE.>>THANKS.>>THANKS.>>WE ALWAYS BOW.>>WE ALWAYS BOW.>>THANKS.>>THANKS. VERY NICE, BUT I COMPLETELY VERY NICE, BUT I COMPLETELY AGREE WITH YOU. AGREE WITH YOU. THE LETTER REALLY DIDN’T SAY THE LETTER REALLY DIDN’T SAY ANYTHING USEFUL. ANYTHING USEFUL. I THOUGHT CHAIRMAN NEAL’S LETTER I THOUGHT CHAIRMAN NEAL’S LETTER REQUEST LAYS OUT A COUPLE OF REQUEST LAYS OUT A COUPLE OF REASONS THAT WOULD QUALIFY AS REASONS THAT WOULD QUALIFY AS LEGISLATIVE PURPOSES AND ONE OF LEGISLATIVE PURPOSES AND ONE OF THE ONES THAT IS LAID OUT I THE ONES THAT IS LAID OUT I THINK IS PARTICULARLY STRONG, THINK IS PARTICULARLY STRONG, WHICH IS TO LEND OVERSIGHT OVER WHICH IS TO LEND OVERSIGHT OVER THE IRS’S AUDIT OF THE THE IRS’S AUDIT OF THE PRESIDENT’S RETURNS. PRESIDENT’S RETURNS. THE PRESIDENT HAS INDICATED THE PRESIDENT HAS INDICATED REPEATEDLY THAT HIS RETURNS ARE REPEATEDLY THAT HIS RETURNS ARE UNDER AUDIT, BUT THE FACT IS UNDER AUDIT, BUT THE FACT IS THERE HAVE BEEN PROBLEMS WITH THERE HAVE BEEN PROBLEMS WITH THAT IN THE PAST. THAT IN THE PAST. THE FIRST AUDIT BY THE IRS OF THE FIRST AUDIT BY THE IRS OF PRESIDENT NIXON’S RETURNS, PRESIDENT NIXON’S RETURNS, ACTUALLY, THE IRS GAVE PRESIDENT ACTUALLY, THE IRS GAVE PRESIDENT NIXON A COMPLETE, CLEAN BILL OF NIXON A COMPLETE, CLEAN BILL OF TAX HEALTH AS A RESULT OF THAT TAX HEALTH AS A RESULT OF THAT AUDIT, AND EVEN SENT PRESIDENT AUDIT, AND EVEN SENT PRESIDENT NIXON A LETTER COMPLIMENTING HIM NIXON A LETTER COMPLIMENTING HIM ON THE CARE WITH WHICH HE HAD ON THE CARE WITH WHICH HE HAD PREPARED THOSE RETURNS, BUT ON PREPARED THOSE RETURNS, BUT ON LATER AUDITS OF THE SAME LATER AUDITS OF THE SAME RETURNS, ONE BY THE NONPARTISAN RETURNS, ONE BY THE NONPARTISAN STAFF OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE ON STAFF OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE ON TAXATION AND ONE BY THE IRS TAXATION AND ONE BY THE IRS AGAIN, WE DISCOVERED THAT, IN AGAIN, WE DISCOVERED THAT, IN FACT, PRESIDENT NIXON OWED FACT, PRESIDENT NIXON OWED ALMOST A HALF A MILLION DOLLARS ALMOST A HALF A MILLION DOLLARS OF ADDITIONAL TAX AND INTEREST, OF ADDITIONAL TAX AND INTEREST, SO THERE’S AN INHERENT CONFLICT SO THERE’S AN INHERENT CONFLICT OF INTEREST WHEN THE IRS IS OF INTEREST WHEN THE IRS IS ASKED TO AUDIT, ESSENTIALLY ITS ASKED TO AUDIT, ESSENTIALLY ITS BOSS, AND IT’S ABSOLUTELY THE BOSS, AND IT’S ABSOLUTELY THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CONGRESS AND RESPONSIBILITY OF CONGRESS AND THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE TO EXERCISE ITS OVERSIGHT EXERCISE ITS OVERSIGHT RESPONSIBILITY TO DOUBLE CHECK RESPONSIBILITY TO DOUBLE CHECK THAT THOSE AUDIT — THAT AUDIT THAT THOSE AUDIT — THAT AUDIT IS BEING DONE APPROPRIATELY OR IS BEING DONE APPROPRIATELY OR WHETHER THERE’S ANY FUNNY WHETHER THERE’S ANY FUNNY BUSINESS GOING ON. BUSINESS GOING ON. SO I THINK THAT THE CHAIR SO I THINK THAT THE CHAIR MINNESOTA ISMAN IS MINNESOTA ISMAN IS VERY SMART IN LAYING OUT THAT VERY SMART IN LAYING OUT THAT RATIONALE AS WELL AS OTHERS FOR RATIONALE AS WELL AS OTHERS FOR THIS REQUEST. THIS REQUEST.>>LET’S LISTEN TO RICHIE NEAL.>>LET’S LISTEN TO RICHIE NEAL. THE AUDIENCE WILL FINALLY GET TO THE AUDIENCE WILL FINALLY GET TO HEAR HIS VOICE. HEAR HIS VOICE. THEY DON’T HEAR THIS VERY MUCH. THEY DON’T HEAR THIS VERY MUCH. HE DID MAKE SOME COMMENTS HE DID MAKE SOME COMMENTS YESTERDAY ABOUT HIS APPROACH TO YESTERDAY ABOUT HIS APPROACH TO GETTING THE TRUMP TAX RETURNS. GETTING THE TRUMP TAX RETURNS.>>WE FOLLOWED IRS GUIDELINES,>>WE FOLLOWED IRS GUIDELINES, WHICH SUGGESTS TO TAXPAYERS THAT WHICH SUGGESTS TO TAXPAYERS THAT SIX YEARS IS GENERALLY THE SIX YEARS IS GENERALLY THE MEASUREMENTS MEASUREMENTS MEASUREMENTS THAT THEY USE OF MEASUREMENTS THAT THEY USE OF ADVISING TAXPAYERS ON HOW LONG ADVISING TAXPAYERS ON HOW LONG TO KEEP THEIR FORMS. TO KEEP THEIR FORMS. WE DIDN’T WANT TO HAVE THE CASE WE DIDN’T WANT TO HAVE THE CASE PERHAPS DISMISSED ON A TECHNICAL PERHAPS DISMISSED ON A TECHNICAL GLITCH. GLITCH. SO AGAIN, I THINK AS I’VE SAID SO AGAIN, I THINK AS I’VE SAID TO YOU NOW FOR A LONG PERIOD OF TO YOU NOW FOR A LONG PERIOD OF TIME, WE’VE TAKEN A VERY TIME, WE’VE TAKEN A VERY METHODICAL APPROACH TO WHAT WILL METHODICAL APPROACH TO WHAT WILL LIKELY BE AN ESTABLISHED COURT LIKELY BE AN ESTABLISHED COURT CASE. CASE.>>CONGRESSMAN GOMEZ, TALK ABOUT>>CONGRESSMAN GOMEZ, TALK ABOUT THE WAY YOUR CHAIRMAN HAS THE WAY YOUR CHAIRMAN HAS APPROACHED THIS BECAUSE YOU’VE APPROACHED THIS BECAUSE YOU’VE SEEN IT FROM THE INSIDE. SEEN IT FROM THE INSIDE. WE ONLY KNEW ABOUT IT THE MOMENT WE ONLY KNEW ABOUT IT THE MOMENT HIS LETTER CAME OUT SAYING HE HIS LETTER CAME OUT SAYING HE WAS DOING THIS, BUT YOU SAW HIM, WAS DOING THIS, BUT YOU SAW HIM, HOW HE APPROACHED THIS, HOW HE HOW HE APPROACHED THIS, HOW HE BUILT TO THIS MOMENT. BUILT TO THIS MOMENT.>>YOU KNOW, CHAIRMAN NEAL IS>>YOU KNOW, CHAIRMAN NEAL IS ONE OF THE MOST STRATEGIC, ONE OF THE MOST STRATEGIC, METHODICAL INDIVIDUALS IN METHODICAL INDIVIDUALS IN CONGRESS. CONGRESS. HE KNEW WHAT WAS GOING TO BE HE KNEW WHAT WAS GOING TO BE BEFORE US AS A COMMITTEE AND BEFORE US AS A COMMITTEE AND BEFORE HIM, SO HE WAS SETTING UP BEFORE HIM, SO HE WAS SETTING UP SOMETHING TO MAKE SURE THAT WE SOMETHING TO MAKE SURE THAT WE ABIDED BY THE LAW BY STATUTE AND ABIDED BY THE LAW BY STATUTE AND MADE SURE EVERY COMMITTEE MEMBER MADE SURE EVERY COMMITTEE MEMBER UNDERSTOOD THE STATUTE, AND THIS UNDERSTOOD THE STATUTE, AND THIS IS WHY HE’S DONE IT SO SLOW. IS WHY HE’S DONE IT SO SLOW. HE HAD A LOT OF PRESSURE ON HIM HE HAD A LOT OF PRESSURE ON HIM TO GO AFTER THE TAXES RIGHT TO GO AFTER THE TAXES RIGHT AWAY, BUT HE DIDN’T DO THAT AWAY, BUT HE DIDN’T DO THAT BECAUSE HE KNOWS THAT THIS IS BECAUSE HE KNOWS THAT THIS IS TOO IMPORTANT AND THE AMERICAN TOO IMPORTANT AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE COUNTING ON HIM. PEOPLE ARE COUNTING ON HIM.>>GEORGE YIN, I WANT TO TALK>>GEORGE YIN, I WANT TO TALK ABOUT THE LAW THAT GOVERNS THIS. ABOUT THE LAW THAT GOVERNS THIS. IT REFERS TO IT, USES THE PHRASE IT REFERS TO IT, USES THE PHRASE THE SECRETARY SHALL FURNISH THE THE SECRETARY SHALL FURNISH THE TAX RETURNS MEANING THE TAX RETURNS MEANING THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY, AND SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY, AND THAT’S SIMPLY BECAUSE OF THE THAT’S SIMPLY BECAUSE OF THE ORGANIZATIONAL CHART WHERE THE ORGANIZATIONAL CHART WHERE THE IRS IS TECHNICALLY WITHIN THE IRS IS TECHNICALLY WITHIN THE TREASURY DEPARTMENT. TREASURY DEPARTMENT. HISTORICALLY, THOUGH, THESE HISTORICALLY, THOUGH, THESE REQUESTS HAVE ALWAYS BEEN REQUESTS HAVE ALWAYS BEEN HANDLED DIRECTLY BY THE IRS HANDLED DIRECTLY BY THE IRS COMMISSIONER. COMMISSIONER. ISN’T THAT WHY CHAIRMAN NEAL ISN’T THAT WHY CHAIRMAN NEAL ADDRESSED HIS LETTER DIRECTLY TO ADDRESSED HIS LETTER DIRECTLY TO THE IRS COMMISSIONER? THE IRS COMMISSIONER?>>YEAH, YOU’RE RIGHT.>>YEAH, YOU’RE RIGHT. THE COMMISSIONER OF THE IRS HAS THE COMMISSIONER OF THE IRS HAS MORE DIRECT CUSTODIAL MORE DIRECT CUSTODIAL RESPONSIBILITY OVER THE RETURNS. RESPONSIBILITY OVER THE RETURNS. OBVIOUSLY PEOPLE UNDER — OBVIOUSLY PEOPLE UNDER — DIRECTLY UNDER HIM ARE THE ONES DIRECTLY UNDER HIM ARE THE ONES WHO ACTUALLY HAVE THE MATERIAL WHO ACTUALLY HAVE THE MATERIAL THAT THE CHAIRMAN HAS REQUESTED. THAT THE CHAIRMAN HAS REQUESTED. SO IT MAKES SOME SENSE TO DIRECT SO IT MAKES SOME SENSE TO DIRECT THE REQUEST THERE, BUT YOU’RE THE REQUEST THERE, BUT YOU’RE RIGHT. RIGHT. THE STATUTE DOES INDICATE THAT THE STATUTE DOES INDICATE THAT THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY SHALL FURNISH IT. SHALL FURNISH IT. ULTIMATELY THE RESPONSE, ULTIMATELY THE RESPONSE, ASSUMING THAT THERE IS A ASSUMING THAT THERE IS A RESPONSE, THE RESPONSE OF THE RESPONSE, THE RESPONSE OF THE INFORMATION REQUESTED WOULD INFORMATION REQUESTED WOULD PRESUMABLY COME FROM SECRETARY PRESUMABLY COME FROM SECRETARY MNUCHIN. MNUCHIN.>>SO GEORGE, LET ME STAY WITH>>SO GEORGE, LET ME STAY WITH YOU ON THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE YOU ON THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE PRESIDENT’S LAWYER’S LETTER. PRESIDENT’S LAWYER’S LETTER. HE’S ADDRESSING IT TO THE HE’S ADDRESSING IT TO THE TREASURY DEPARTMENT, TO THE TREASURY DEPARTMENT, TO THE COUNSEL AT THE TREASURY COUNSEL AT THE TREASURY DEPARTMENT. DEPARTMENT. HE MAKES A REFERENCE TO ASKING HE MAKES A REFERENCE TO ASKING THE TREASURY DEPARTMENT TO WAIT THE TREASURY DEPARTMENT TO WAIT UNTIL THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT UNTIL THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT BASICALLY TELLS THEM WHAT TO DO. BASICALLY TELLS THEM WHAT TO DO. WHAT’S YOUR REACTION TO THAT WHAT’S YOUR REACTION TO THAT PART OF IT? PART OF IT?>>WELL, I DON’T REALLY SEE ANY>>WELL, I DON’T REALLY SEE ANY GROUNDS FOR THAT AT ALL. GROUNDS FOR THAT AT ALL. AGAIN, THE LAW IS VERY CLEAR, AGAIN, THE LAW IS VERY CLEAR, AND I THOUGHT THAT CHAIRMAN AND I THOUGHT THAT CHAIRMAN NEAL’S REQUEST WAS ACTUALLY VERY NEAL’S REQUEST WAS ACTUALLY VERY SMART ALSO IN THAT IT WAS QUITE SMART ALSO IN THAT IT WAS QUITE TARGETED, SO YUNOU KNOW, THERE’S TARGETED, SO YUNOU KNOW, THERE’S LIMITED AMOUNT OF INFORMATION LIMITED AMOUNT OF INFORMATION THAT’S BEING REQUESTED, AND I THAT’S BEING REQUESTED, AND I WOULD THINK THAT DEPENDING ON WOULD THINK THAT DEPENDING ON HOW DIFFICULT IT IS TO ASSEMBLE HOW DIFFICULT IT IS TO ASSEMBLE IT, IT COULD BE FORWARDED FAIRLY IT, IT COULD BE FORWARDED FAIRLY QUICKLY. QUICKLY. I DON’T REALLY SEE THE NEED FOR I DON’T REALLY SEE THE NEED FOR JUSTICE DEPARTMENT JUSTICE DEPARTMENT INTERPRETATION. INTERPRETATION. THE LAW IS PRETTY THE LAW IS PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD. STRAIGHTFORWARD.>>AND CONGRESSMAN GOMEZ, THE>>AND CONGRESSMAN GOMEZ, THE PRESIDENT HAS ALWAYS SAID AS A PRESIDENT HAS ALWAYS SAID AS A CAMPAIGNER AND HE STILL SAYS, CAMPAIGNER AND HE STILL SAYS, YOU KNOWS YOU CAN’T SEE MY TAX YOU KNOWS YOU CAN’T SEE MY TAX RETURNS BECAUSE THEY’RE BEING RETURNS BECAUSE THEY’RE BEING AUDITED. AUDITED. WE DON’T KNOW IF THAT WAS EVER WE DON’T KNOW IF THAT WAS EVER TRUE WHEN HE WAS A CANDIDATE, TRUE WHEN HE WAS A CANDIDATE, BUT IT IS TRUE THAT THE BUT IT IS TRUE THAT THE PRESIDENT’S TAX RETURNS ARE PRESIDENT’S TAX RETURNS ARE ROUTINELY AUTOMATICALLY AUDITED ROUTINELY AUTOMATICALLY AUDITED BY THE IRS BUT BARACK OBAMA AS BY THE IRS BUT BARACK OBAMA AS PRESIDENT DID TWO THINGS. PRESIDENT DID TWO THINGS. HE ALWAYS FILED HIS INCOME TAX HE ALWAYS FILED HIS INCOME TAX RETURNS ON TIME BEFORE APRIL RETURNS ON TIME BEFORE APRIL 15th, AND HE ALWAYS RELEASED 15th, AND HE ALWAYS RELEASED THOSE TAX RETURNS PUBLICLY UPON THOSE TAX RETURNS PUBLICLY UPON FILING THEM EVEN THOUGH EVERY FILING THEM EVEN THOUGH EVERY ONE OF THOSE TAX RETURNS WAS ONE OF THOSE TAX RETURNS WAS BEING AUDITED? BEING AUDITED?>>THAT’S CORRECT.>>THAT’S CORRECT. YOU KNOW, TRUMP HAS AVOIDED YOU KNOW, TRUMP HAS AVOIDED RELEASING HIS TAXES SINCE HE RELEASING HIS TAXES SINCE HE STARTED RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT, STARTED RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT, AND I THINK WE REALLY NEED TO AND I THINK WE REALLY NEED TO FOCUS IN ON THAT. FOCUS IN ON THAT. WHY DOES HE NOT WANT THE WHY DOES HE NOT WANT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TO SEE HIS AMERICAN PEOPLE TO SEE HIS TAXES? TAXES? THIS IS SOMETHING THAT’S BEEN THIS IS SOMETHING THAT’S BEEN DONE FOR 40 YEARS, REPUBLICANS DONE FOR 40 YEARS, REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATS ALIKE HAVE AND DEMOCRATS ALIKE HAVE RELEASED THEIR TAX RETURNS. RELEASED THEIR TAX RETURNS. AND EVEN WHILE UNDER AUDIT SO AND EVEN WHILE UNDER AUDIT SO THERE’S NOTHING THAT PREVENTS THERE’S NOTHING THAT PREVENTS HIM FROM ACTUALLY SHOWING HIS HIM FROM ACTUALLY SHOWING HIS TAXES AND PUTTING THE AMERICAN TAXES AND PUTTING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AT EASE THAT HE’S NOT PEOPLE AT EASE THAT HE’S NOT UNDER LEVERAGE OR BEING UNDER LEVERAGE OR BEING LEVERAGED BY AN INDIVIDUAL OR BY LEVERAGED BY AN INDIVIDUAL OR BY A FOREIGN GOVERNMENT. A FOREIGN GOVERNMENT.>>CONGRESSMAN GYMJIMMY GOMEZ AN

Author Since: Mar 11, 2019

  1. Aaa trump should be impeached sentenced and incarcerated for crimes against America
    He should go live in Russia or a long stint in prison…he is a traitor yo our country on a daily basis
    Trump should have been behind bars for the rest of his worthless life

  2. So they have been only doing tax returns for 40 years!!

    Well thats youtr President's business if there filed and rhe audit has picked nothing up, thats the end to it.

  3. Another OBSTRUCTION. WE THE PEOPLE DEMAND the taxes and the full Muller report. Ok AMERICA Get it done.

  4. trump this is AMERICA not a DICTATORSHIP ship you work for us we are not you subjects our Drivers License are blue and the llast name dont say trump so stop trying to be a controll freak.

  5. These Lawyers of Trump's what he's doing for him. Does know exactly everything Trump is trying do to our country and is breaking the laws and our constitution

  6. Democrats are always angry! that is how they get into office, intimidation and fraud, illigal voters and more…. Trump 2020 Thank you Judge Jeanine…
    I Can't find "Kevin's Corner" today?

  7. Just as Ivanka said on camera " Oh yes we get most of our money from Russia! " The take over of our democracy is happening before our eyes and we are doing nothing to stop it!

  8. As a Brit it seems to me that Trump is a driving a bulldozer through your constitution and nobody is prepared to stop him. If the issue goes to court, Trump has installed his lackeys into the Justice Department and as judges. I fear for your country now and more so if he is re-elected. God help America

  9. That first lawyer did just what Drumpf asked him knowing it was nonsense. But hey, it pays well.
    By know there is no self respecting lawyer that want risk his good name by representing Drumpf.
    So he is left with the lesser talented

  10. Seems to me the con man does not file his taxes. So there's nothing there. If there were tax returns filed, his Accountant would have had them. Why this is a mystery is that he does not report his income so he cannot produce any documents . Period! Maybe bankruptcy papers might be available. He is the master of bankruptcies.

  11. tRump's Personal Tax Returns? We will find out that he has significant income from off-shore sources some of which might be recognized as Russian or Russian related. We will find out that tRump as through his businesses had significant business actions that just might be within the purview of laundering. We will find out that tRump income tax reports from personal to corporate to charitable to bank loan documentation do not match. Some might say that when things do not match you hav to have in mind that there are oranges and there are apples and that you cannot compare them without extensive explanation. Others might say that those explanations are LIES. Take your pick. This is not #NewMath. If a 3 year old can manager to avoid adult blockades on their cell phones then why should a 70+ year old man be allowed to interpret just what is it that he provides to the government and government-obligated business entities?

  12. When upwards of 70% of the U.S. population want something it means what they want is mainstream. 70% of americans want Medicare for all or a similar solution to the health care debacle making this subjects mainstream. Continuously television news tells us that Medicare for all is an extreme view and congresspeople tell us the same thing because their corporate bosses have deemed it so. As much as I usually like Laurence and his ideas he is blatantly misrepresenting a mainstream issue as being fringe when the numbers say otherwise. The corporate media does this all the time whenever the public wants progress and it goes against the shareholders want of same old same old.. The green new deal is another idea whose time has come, providing work for a rapidly obsolete work force while cleaning up our country is an idea every working person can get behind yet to hear the news broadcast tell it only fringe socialists want this when more than 1/2 of Americans want something of this nature to some our collective problems.

  13. Good commentaty Lawrence. You always give it to us straight and accurate. Trump's taxes will reveal his money is as dirty as an oil slick. Tic toc .

  14. Trump should be investigated for selling 3 Condominiums in Trump Towers to Bogatin at 15 million dollars each in Trump Towers in Manhattan just above his own with laundered money by the Don of the Colombo MAFIA through Poland.
    Al.

  15. How does NY Times reporter know what the information he stated about Trump's tax returns and his finances? The IRS should not have to repeat an audit if they are doing their jobs properly since tax law cannot be interpreted multiple ways. Ensure there is a cross check so that second audits are not just "witch hunting" escapades.

  16. Trump is misleading everybody just like the anti Christ warning. Everything he cries iut, he is the one doing it and proects it on whomever. He is a national shame

  17. The introduction is way too long.
    We know you are a former Congress person, half of the time is sent on accolades and please let him talk, we've heard enough

  18. I think we should treat everyone like you people ask for. We should search every person in America for crimes to make sure they deserve their privledged American life. I call for FBI to systematically investigate every American in hopes to find a crime. I'm calling for fascism, yes, just like MSNBC…and CNN.

  19. hey if we did not have to show are taxes we would all be rich. tax free. but that not how it is. if we have to show it! So should he, Trump you are not above the Law. we as people are not above the Law. We do crime, we do TIME! So should !YOU! Your Not in !!EXCUSE!! OR !! EXCEPTION !! OR !!EXCUSED!!

  20. Trump could just release his tax and congress would not had say that he lost close to 2 billion dollar with in 10 years, they just want to see did the money come from anybody in russian.

  21. All you need is the complexion for the protection..
    (Paul Mooney ) Any one else will be under the jail about their taxes. But after Obama read my lips. Just like they're no touching Harvey Weinstein. They are doing everything no to touch Trump. This is bigger then impeachment it's the fear of losing white supremacy. They will talk talk until the media find a black face to divert attention.
    Like Michael Jackson, R Kelly, Bill Cosby. Let's see how it plays out…..Look at how Facebook shot down Minister Louis Farrakhan. White Supremacy…….

  22. Lawyers for trump take his money, write the nothing letter, and laugh when chump leaves their office. Lol

  23. The tax returns won't show whether trump is being leveraged by a foreign government because he hasn't reported that money. THIS is why the Deutsche Bank and other bank info is necessary. I will bet there is a discrepancy between his bank records and his tax returns.

  24. So we know he isn't rich. We know he lost a billion dollars in a year….we know he's a liar and a cheat and traitor….we know he cheats on his wives, he does business with mobsters…he's lied nearly 10,000 times, we know he lost the popular election….BUT something in his tax returns is worse than all the things we know about….brace yourselves.

  25. It's sad the day you have to explain what it means the separation of powers and law to the common people that didn't have social Studies teacher that believed in ourselves and our fallen Son's that gave their life in believe in our society beliefs in our constitution. They no idea what that means . No wonder teachers are struggling & striking out everywhere else in the country.

  26. I wonder who doing his taxes ? Is that what he's trying to stop us from knowing? Who has been given him all this tax breaks,who approved them ? Makes you wonder bout that ????

  27. It is possible that he didn't pay his taxes OR that every one of his tax returns is a false document of evasion about all of DT's financial earnings, losses, spending, borrowing, etc., etc., i.e., cover-ups for decades.

  28. Poor attorney he gonna get stiffed. Better cut his loses now and cut the CLOWN off before the bill gets out of hand!

  29. Trump hasn't PD tax's in 8yrs..he lost to much money…no he is a fraud and liar…lied about his tax's…so he wouldn't have to pay them.like father like son…he just can't let his base see what a crook he really is…they would surely turn on him .if the truth comes out .and it will eventually….mark my words..

  30. His lawyers know he is guilty, is it not against the law to defend a client if you know that client is guilty ?

  31. It would better to give Mueller a subpoena for testify for the committee. He is the walking BOMBSHELL, he need only some fire to explode the truth.

  32. we want FULL Disclosure- Weiner Laptop,Epstein Island Flight Logs Clintons missing e-mails,Transcript of bribe offered to Atty. Gen. LLynch on airport Tarmac by Bubba the perv Clinton Names & Amounts of payouts made to staffers by CON gressional perverts for sexual Misconduct.Get those- & your ratings might climb past Sponge Bob

  33. The truth is in my opinion Trump in could care less about the Stormy Daniels incident could care less about his tax return could care less about Russian conclusion these are all stall tactics that have been thought out and put in place place to do exactly what they've been designed to do to take our attention away from his real mandate of his presidency.
    The real Narrative of his presidency is to tear down image up the country and the presidency any eyes of the world

  34. Why do more democrats keep jumping in the race for 2020?
    I think it’s unrealistic to fracture the party in so many ways
    And also, the funds are dispersed in so many directions.
    I think some are doing it for name recognition and to test
    the waters for 2024.. very selfish. We need to unite and focus
    so we can take trump out of the White House. Need to elect
    a knowledgeable, conscientious person who has the country
    at heart not their pocketbook.

  35. Right there. Do you see it? Intentionally not talking about the real crimes. Trump's taxes don't mean anything. They know this. But, if they were smart, they would getting ready for the declassifications that are coming up. If they did, they just might regain a miniscule of respect. At least, if you're going to talk about financial topics, talk about the president's budget plan. If they do, it's about how he cuts Medicair. Yes he cuts Medicair, after it gets a much needed overhaul, cutting out rediculous spending. If you look at the plan, it will run better, be more reliable, at a cheaper cost. Read it. It's public record. Another thing financial that should be looked at is not a billionaire that became a politician, they should look at politicians that became millionaires. Take Pelosi, for example. Career politician. 200,000 dollar salary. Net worth, 25 million. 30 years in Congress, never, not once presented her tax returns. Accuse the opposition with what they're guilty of. Those that scream loudest have the most to be afraid of. Nothing can stop what is coming.

  36. I DONT KNOW WHY THE PEOPLE REPRESENT AS A "HONOREUBLE" TO THIS AG BARR CAUSE THIS FAT PIG DONT HAVE NOTHING OF THAT.

  37. in the news in the groove and on the move: donald has fashioned himself in the image of al capone, he is a wealthy powerful shameless crook, and it was a tax trail that caught up with al capone

  38. deutsche bank has all the dirt, you can always bank on a bank having loads of dirt, after all if you jave enough dirt there you find the gold

  39. Why isnt anybody asking this 1 question? What is motivating these people to help this POS? Money beyond there wildest dreams? Power? Threat of Russian attack? What is it? And when this is all over there going to be saying "I was just doing my job"!

  40. Everyone thinking that turtle-man & other spin-doctors for the orange turd are spineless are missing the point. They’re all benefitting from 45’s lawlessness & that’s why they’re saying nothing. They want him in office because they’re getting away with murder while he distracts everyone away from what they’re doing.

  41. What is this? Do you actually listen through the first ten minutes of this ?? Did anybody? I'm not sure!

    I'm very clearly absolutely NO SUPPORTER of Trump. But do you actually hear all this? Could one talk and talk and talk and talk and talk and still say next to nothing, absolutely nothing other than we could see and prove from Trumps tax report that he committed a crime if we ever get to see them?

    Then … SAY IT! SAY IT CLEAR AND LOUD
    If you want EVERYBODY to be treated fairly!?
    SAY IT!

    Are Trumps voters the ones that want to hear long arguments with reasoning after reasoning?
    He somehow won the Presidency with just doing this one right: He is convincing!!! Even when lying! 🙁
    I often don't do it myself and don't even like to tailor my own talk to just … be convincing – nothing else.

    But if you are on TV then FOCUS on the message, don't do the job for FOX NEWS! If I see stuff like this and go outside to the grocery store or do a Saturday visit to Costco – I know why Trump is still President!

  42. I have nothing against the rich if they legitatively worked and is self made millionaires. I don't even knock those born with a gold or silver spoon. I just don't like I'll gotten riches people who deceived others to get rich or businesses that ceo's get the payout but the hands on workers get a minimum.

  43. Lawrence the lawyers recognized doltish 45 is fool that thinks lawyers are miracles workers, so they’re not fools like him , they making money out of the mentally defective imbecile.

  44. Trump has made a joke out of the American people for those of us who are intelligent ii is a insult this guy makes pinocchio look like a saint.

  45. bottom line is, Trump didn't release his taxes because he realizes that white people hate black people more then they love America. this is the reality of life in America in until you white people that don't hate black people more you love America called out these people, it will keep on happening. REALTALK

  46. I for one, can not wait to see what trump is hiding in his tax returns. . . . . that will be good times!!!💣✌

  47. Well, that’s how they got Al Capone
    By Elliot Nest 🤨and the untouchables are
    – coming back to haunt Trump

  48. Trump knows that his tax return will never lie as he has been because the truth will cost him everything including his presidency.

  49. 1:34 ''completely trusted by BOTH sides''.
    Hm.
    Yet, this same COS or his counterpart brought in the latest, corrupt, unfair and destructive taxation that has helped the wealthy and burdened the poor?
    ERM.

  50. Congressman Richie Neal should expand his request to include the tax returns of Steven Mnuchin, Rettig, the new IRS general Counsel, Wilbur Ross & every single member of the Trump Cabinet, considering they are all very wealthy in their own right & probably using some questionable tax credits. And, of course, Mike Pence, William Barr, etc…..

  51. So what are they saying our President is a Russian Spy inside our country and that's the reason he want show his taxes because he owes Putin 💰…I HOPE NOT…SMH

  52. This is such a joke… for Trump to be going all of this to not have turn in his tax return .. he has to be hiding something

  53. Sounds like a lot of guessing and wishful thinking called news, but Glen Beck did that to Obama so I guess everyone is fools. I claim independent because politicians are embarrassing on both sides.

  54. I did not see they say anything about Schwarzenegger movie star become Governor of CA. longtime ago. What different now?

  55. Which Birth's did you record as your own to protect? If you do not know, how responsible are you and your officials?

  56. What is trump hiding in regards to his taxes,the harder it is to see them the harder it is to believe trump – it must be very serious for him not to want them released hmmm must be really bad? Trump is going above and beyond to do so wonder the
    Americans are suspicious ! He's (trump) not smart enough to realize that!

  57. Stop twisting the truth. He banned epstein from the maralago. Trump twists the truth…He says he was never a fan of epstein. Trump lied. You twist the truth . Trump is friends with epstein. He is not. He befriended him decades ago. Can anyone tell the
    truth? Who can anyone believe if everyone is telling things that are not completely true. Ideology is not truth. Truth is truth.

Related Post