President Trump speaks after Robert Mueller testifies, live stream



YEARS FOR OUR COUNTRY. THE ADMINISTRATION, OUR PRESIDENT, ME, WE'VE DONE A GREAT JOB. WE'VE GOT THE STRONGEST STOCK MARKET, THE BEST UNEMPLOYMENT NUMBERS, THE MOST NUMBER OF PEOPLE EVER WORKING IN THE HISTORY OF OUR COUNTRY RIGHT NOW. ALMOST 160 MILLION. OUR MILITARY HAS BEEN REBUILT AND GETTING EVEN STRONGER. WE'VE DONE A GREAT JOB. AND WE HAVE DONE IT UNDER THIS TERRIBLE PHONY CLOUD, A PHONY CLOUD. THAT'S ALL IT WAS. AND THEY SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF THEMSELVES. ABSOLUTELY ASHAMED. YOU KNOW WHO KNEW IT WAS A PHONY CLOUD MORE THAN ANYONE ELSE, NADLER AND SCHUMER AND PELOSI. EVERY ONE OF THEM. THEY ALL KNEW IT WAS PHONY STUFF. AND YOU LOOK AT THE POLLS. THE POLLS ARE SHOWING IT MAYBE MORE THAN ANYBODY ELSE OR ANYTHING ELSE. AND I'VE HAD MY BEST POLLS AND I DON'T SAY WHY. BUT PEOPLE SEE WHAT HAS GONE ON IN OUR COUNTRY WITH THIS WHOLE THING. I'VE BEEN GOING THROUGH IT FOR THREE YEARS. FOR THREE YEARS. ALL NONSENSE. SO THIS WAS A VERY BIG DAY FOR OUR COUNTRY. THIS WAS A VERY BIG DAY FOR THE REPUBLICAN PARTY. AND YOU COULD SAY IT WAS A GREAT DAY FOR ME. BUT I DON'T EVEN LIKE TO SAY THAT. IT IS GREAT. I'LL TELL YOU WHAT, I VERY MUCH APPRECIATE THOSE INCREDIBLE WARRIORS THAT YOU WATCHED TODAY ON TELEVISION, REPUBLICANS, THAT DEFENDED SOMETHING AND DEFENDED SOMETHING VERY POWERFUL, VERY IMPORTANT. BECAUSE THEY WERE REALLY DEFENDING OUR COUNTRY. MORE THAN ANYTHING ELSE, THEY WERE DEFENDING OUR COUNTRY. BUT THEY WERE WARRIORS. AND THEY HAVE BEEN WARRIORS FOR A LONG TIME. AND EVERYBODY KNEW IT WAS A HOAX. ESPECIALLY THE DEMOCRATS. I WISH WE COULD BE A FLY ON THE WALL IN THOSE ROOMS WHERE THE DEMOCRATS WOULD GO IN AND TALK BEFORE AND AFTER MEETINGS. AND THEY WOULD BE LAUGHING AND SMILING AND SAY CAN YOU BELIEVE THAT WE'RE GETTING AWAY WITH THIS. BUT IN THE END, THEY DIDN'T GET AWAY WITH IT. YEAH. >> SO THERE IS NO SUCH A THING. HE DIDN'T HAVE THE RIGHT TO EXONERATE. AND, YOU KNOW, IT IS VERY INTERESTING. PEOPLE MENTION EXONERATION. THAT WAS SOMETHING WHERE HE TOTALLY FOLDED. BECAUSE HE NEVER HAD THE RIGHT TO EXONERATE. AND IT WAS COVERED VERY WELL BY CONGRESSMAN TURNER. AND PUT TO A CONCLUSION. IF YOU LOOK AT NOT ONLY THE REPORT, BEYOND THE REPORT — TAKE A LOOK AT NOT WHAT HE SAID BUT WHAT HE WAS FORCED TO SAY. EVEN YOUR NETWORK AND YOUR NETWORK AND YOUR NETWORK, EVERY ONE OF THESE NETWORKS. THEY PUT UP THEIR HANDS. WE HAD A COUPLE OF CASES — ACTUALLY WE HAD ABOUT SIX CASES WHERE THEY ASKED OUR PEOPLE, OUR REPRESENTATIVES, TELEVISION NETWORKS PLEASE DON'T COME IN TONIGHT. WE WON'T BE DOING MUCH ON IT. THE REASON THEY'RE NOT IS BECAUSE IT'S OVER. GO AHEAD. >> ARE YOU CONCERNED YOU COULD BE INDICTED OUT OF OFFICE? >> SO WIKILEAKS IS A HOAX JUST LIKE EVERYTHING ELSE. AND ALL OF THOSE PROBLEMS HAVING TO DO WITH CRIME WERE THE BIGGEST HOAX OF ALL. IT WAS A WITCH HUNT. A TOTAL WITCH HUNT. AND WHEN YOU SAW ROBERT MUELLER'S STATEMENT, THE EARLIER STATEMENT, AND THEN HE DID A RECAP, HE DID A CORRECTION LATER ON IN THE AFTERNOON. AND YOU KNOW WHAT THAT CORRECTION WAS AND YOU STILL ASKED THE QUESTION. DO YOU KNOW WHY? BECAUSE YOU'RE FAKE NEWS. AND YOU'RE ONE OF THE MOST. LET ME JUST TELL YOU. THE FACT THAT YOU EVEN ASKED THAT QUESTION, YOU'RE FAKE NEWS. BECAUSE YOU KNOW WHAT, HE TOTALLY CORRECTED HIMSELF IN THE AFTERNOON. AND YOU KNOW THAT JUST AS WELL AS ANYBODY. >> CAITLIN. CAITLIN. >> WHAT WAS NOT TRUTHFUL IN YOUR WRITTEN ANSWERS. >> I DON'T KNOW WHOSE ANSWERS WEREN'T. I GUESS HIS ANSWERS WEREN'T. IF YOU LOOK AT THE WHOLE REPORT, YOU TAKE A LOOK WHAT THE THEY DID. SOME OF THE THINGS THAT HE DIDN'T EVEN KNOW ABOUT, SOME OF THE THINGS THAT HE DIDN'T EVEN KNOW WHAT WAS GOING ON. BUT, YOU KNOW, IN THE END WHAT HE DID, HE ACTUALLY PROBABLY CAME THROUGH FOR HIMSELF. THE PERFORMANCE WAS OBVIOUSLY NOT VERY GOOD. HE HAD A LOT OF PROBLEMS. BUT WHAT HE SHOWED MORE THAN ANYTHING ELSE IS THAT THIS WHOLE THING HAS BEEN THREE YEARS OF EMBARRASSMENT AND WASTE OF TIME FOR OUR COUNTRY. YOU KNOW WHAT, THE DEMOCRATS THOUGHT THEY COULD WIN A ELECTION LIKE THIS. I THINK THEY HURT THEMSELVES VERY BADLY FOR 2020. >> DID I WHAT. >> DID YOU FIND — >> I DON'T KNOW. I REALLY DON'T KNOW. I DON'T KNOW. GO AHEAD. I MEAN, FRANKLY WHETHER OR NOT HE DID WOULDN'T MATTER TO ME. BECAUSE HE DID NOTHING WRONG. HE DID NOTHING WRONG. BECAUSE IT IS SO UNIMPORTANT. IT WAS ALWAYS A VERY UNIMPORTANT MEETING. IT WAS ONLY IMPORTANT TO THE FAKE NEWS. GO AHEAD. >> MUELLER SAID THAT YOU COULD BE CHARGED ONCE YOU LEAVE OFFICE. >> NO, HE DIDN'T SAY THAT. AGAIN, YOU'RE FAKE NEWS AND YOU'RE RIGHT AT THE TOP OF THE LIST ALSO. LET ME JUST TELL YOU. >> THAT IS WHAT HE SAID. >> IT IS NOT WHAT HE SAID. READ HIS CORRECTION. >> THAT IS NOT — >> READ HIS CORRECTION. IF YOU READ HIS CORRECTION, YOU WILL FIND THAT. THAT'S WHY PEOPLE DON'T DEAL WITH YOU, BECAUSE YOU'RE NOT AN HONEST REPORTER. >> ANSWER THE QUESTION. >> JOHN. 'S BABY THEY ARE DEVASTATED. THE DEMOCRATS LOST SO BIG, THEIR PARTY IN SHAMBLES RIGHT NOW. THE SQUAD IS LEAVING THE PARTY, THEY ARE A MESS. YOU TAKE A LOOK AT SO MANY OF THE PEOPLE THAT WERE THE MOST OUTSPOKEN, THIS WAS A DEVASTATING DAY FOR THE DEMOCRATS. YOU KNOW IT, JOHN AND EVERYBODY ELSE. THIS WAS A DEVASTATING DAY. VERY DUMB AND VERY UNFAIR QUESTION BECAUSE IF YOU LOOK AT HIS CORRECTION, HE TOOK THAT TOTALLY OUT OF PLAY. HE MADE HIS DECISION BASED ON THE FACTS, NOT ON SOME RULE. YOU SHOULD NOT ASK THAT QUESTION. GO AHEAD. >> Reporter: [ INAUDIBLE QUESTION ] >> THE DEMOCRATS HAD NOTHING AND NOW THEY HAVE LESS THAN NOTHING. I THINK THEY ARE GOING TO LOSE THE 2020 ELECTION VERY BIG, INCLUDING CONGRESSIONAL SEATS BECAUSE OF THE PATH THEY CHOSE. WHO KNOWS WHERE IT GOES, FROM WHAT I HEAR, THEY ARE GIVING UP BUT I KNOW THEM TOO WELL, THEY WILL NEVER GO BACK. THEY WILL GO BACK INTO THE ROOM AND TRY TO FIGURE SOMETHING OUT. THIS WHOLE THING HAS HONESTLY BEEN COLLUSION. IT HAS BEEN COLLUSION WITH THE MEDIA, COLLUSION WITH OTHER COUNTRIES. THIS HAS BEEN A DISASTER FOR THE DEMOCRATS AND I THINK WE ARE GOING TO WIN BIGGER THAN EVER. NOW, I'M GOING TO WEST VIRGINIA, ONE OF THE GREAT STATES. A STATE, IF YOU LOOK AT PERCENTAGE UP, IT IS NUMBER ONE OR TWO IN THE COUNTRY, NOBODY WANTS TO BELIEVE THAT, WEST VIRGINIA IS DOING GREAT. I'M GOING TO WEST VIRGINIA, WE HAD A BIG CASE TODAY, WE WON THE ASYLUM CASE IN WASHINGTON, WHICH FRANKLY YOU SHOULD BE ASKING ABOUT THAT BECAUSE THAT IS THE REAL DEAL. I CANNOT BELIEVE HOW NICE YOU ARE TODAY. GO AHEAD, GIVE ME A QUESTION. >> Reporter: [ INAUDIBLE QUESTION ] >> NO, BECAUSE WE DID NOTHING WRONG. THE ANSWER IS VERY SIMPLE, NOTHING WAS DONE WRONG. THIS WAS ALL A BIG HOAX. IF YOU LOOK AT IT TODAY, NOTHING WAS DONE WRONG. I BELIEVE WHAT YOU'RE GOING TO FIND, YOU'RE GOING TO FIND A LOT OF THINGS, SOME WERE DONE VERY WRONG, THAT IS GOING ON NOW, SOMETHING YOU HAVE NOT BEEN WRITING ABOUT AND THAT HAS TO DO WITH THE OTHER SIDE. THAT HAS TO DO WITH THE THING CALLED INVESTIGATE THE INVESTIGATORS. LET'S SEE WHAT HAPPENS. THAT WILL BE VERY INTERESTING. >> Reporter: DO YOU THINK ROBERT MUELLER DID A GOOD JOB? >> LOOK, I THINK ROBERT MUELLER DID A HORRIBLE JOB. BOTH TODAY AND WITH RESPECT TO THE INVESTIGATION BUT IN ALL FAIRNESS TO ROBERT MUELLER, HE HAD NOTHING TO WORK WITH. YOU KNOW, YOU CAN BE A BUILDER BUT IF THEY DON'T GIVE YOU THE RIGHT MATERIALS, YOU WON'T BUILD A VERY GOOD BUILDING. ROBERT MUELLER HAD NO MATERIAL, NOTHING TO WORK WITH. OBVIOUSLY, HE DID VERY POORLY TODAY. I DON'T THINK THERE'S EVEN ANYBODY AMONG THE FAKERS, THAT SAY HE DID WELL. I LOOKED AT YOUR PEOPLE THAT SAID IT WAS DEVASTATING FOR THE DEMOCRATS, EVEN I WILL TELL YOU, THE TWO MOST NAUSEOUS AND NAUSEATING NETWORKS WHOSE RATINGS HAVE BOTH GONE WAY DOWN, EVEN THEY SAID THIS WAS A REALLY BAD DAY FOR THE DEMOCRATS. SO, ROBERT MUELLER DID A POOR JOB BUT IN ALL FAIRNESS TO HIM, HE HAD NOTHING TO WORK WITH.'S >> Reporter: DO YOU REGRET NOT TALKING TO MUELLER? >> LOOK, I SAW WHAT HE DID TO PEOPLE, HOW HE RUINED PEOPLE'S LIVES BECAUSE THEY DID NOT REMEMBER A DATE OR SOMETHING MINOR. HE RUINED PEOPLE'S LIVES. THE DEMOCRATS TOOK PEOPLE, THEY DESTROYED THEIR LIVES. THEY WENT BANKRUPT BECAUSE THEY COULD NOT AFFORD THE LEGAL FEES, THEY WERE GOOD PEOPLE, MANY MANY PEOPLE. WHEN YOU ASKED ME THAT QUESTION, ALL THEY HAVE TO DO IS SEE HOW NICE THIS WEATHER úI SAID I WAS TALKING TO THE MEDIA AND IT WAS A LITTLE BIT RAINY, A LITTLE BIT OVERCAST, WELL, HE LIED. LET ME TELL YOU, I'VE SEEN WHAT THEY HAVE DONE TO PEOPLE, HOW THEY DESTROYED PEOPLE LIKE GENERAL FLYNN AND SO MANY OTHERS. WHAT THEY HAVE DONE TO PEOPLE. NO, I DID THE RIGHT THING. >> Reporter: YOU SAID MUELLER DID A HORRIBLE JOB [ INAUDIBLE QUESTION ] >> MUELLER HAD NO MATERIAL. NO MATERIAL TO WORK WITH AND HE DID A HORRIBLE JOB. OBVIOUSLY, HIS PRESENTATION WAS WAY OFF BUT THAT'S OKAY. IT DID NOT MATTER, HE HAD NO MATERIAL, THERE WAS NOTHING DONE WRONG. IN FACT, THINGS WERE DONE RIGHT, THERE WAS NOTHING DONE WRONG AND CERTAINLY, LOOK I READ THE PAPERS AND THE PRESS AND THE INTERNET. YOU SEE WHAT IS GOING ON THE INTERNET, YOU LISTEN TO THE INTERNET, THIS WAS ONE OF THE WORST PERFORMANCES IN THE HISTORY OF OUR COUNTRY. YOU KNOW THAT VERY WELL. BUT I DON'T TANK ANYBODY COULD HAVE DONE A GOOD PERFORMANCE, HE HAD NO MATERIAL. IT WAS A FAKE SET OF FACTS THE DEMOCRATS USED, AND OTHERS, TO TRY TO DO REALLY AN ILLEGAL OVERTHROW THAT WE WILL FIND OUT ABOUT. >> Reporter: [ INAUDIBLE QUESTION ] >> THE ASYLUM — >> Reporter: WHAT ABOUT GUATEMALA? >> THE ASYLUM IS A BIG RULING, TREMENDOUS RULING. WE APPRECIATE IT. WE RESPECT THE COURTS VERY MUCH, THAT HELPS US VERY MUCH AT THE BOARDER. THE NUMBERS ARE WAY DOWN AT THE BORDER WHICH IS A GOOD THING, APPREHENSIONS ARE WAY DOWN BECAUSE MEXICO HAS 22,000 SOLDIERS AND THEY MEAN BUSINESS , THEY KNOW WHAT HAPPENS, IT IS ALSO GOOD FOR MEXICO WHAT THEY ARE DOING BECAUSE THE CARTELS HAVE BEEN RUNNING THE BORDER FOR YEARS AND YEARS AND MEXICO SAYS, THE PRESIDENT SAYS WE HAVE TO CLEAN IT UP. THEY HAVE 21,000 SOLDIERS, THEY WILL PROBABLY PUT UP MORE. THIS RULING TODAY ON ASYLUM IS TREMENDOUS. >> Reporter: WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT GUATEMALA? >> GUATEMALA GAVE US THEIR WORK, WE WOULD SIGN AN AGREEMENT, ALL OF A SUDDEN THEY BACKED OUT, THEY SAID IT WAS THEIR SUPREME COURT. I DON'T BELIEVE THAT. THEY USED THEIR SUPREME COURT AS THE REASON THEY WANT TO DO IT. WE WILL EITHER DO TERRORISTS OR WE WILL DO SOMETHING, WE ARE LOOKING AT SOMETHING VERY SEVERE WITH RESPECT TO GUATEMALA. I HAVE ALREADY CUT OFF PAYMENTS, I DID THAT A YEAR AGO. I CUT OFF ALL PAYMENTS GOING TO HONDURAS, EL SALVADOR, AND GUATEMALA. WE USED TO SEND THEM $500 MILLION FOR NOTHING, NOTHING. THEY DID NOT DO ANYTHING EXCEPT SET UP CARAVANS. GUATEMALA, WE WILL TAKE CARE OF AND IT WON'T BE TOUGH, WE ARE LOOKING AT A COUPLE DIFFERENT THINGS. ONE OF THE THINGS VERY HEAVY AS YOU KNOW, MEXICO HAS PUT 6000 PEOPLE ON THAT BORDER. >> Reporter: WHAT DO YOU SAY ABOUT ROBERT MUELLER, LYING [ INAUDIBLE QUESTION ] >> LET ME TELL YOU SOMETHING, YOU ALWAYS HAVE A QUESTION. YOU MEAN MY WHITE HOUSE AIDES LIE? WHAT ABOUT HIS AIDES, WHAT ABOUT MUELLER'S AIDES? HE DID NOT SAY THAT AT ALL. YOU ARE UNTRUTHFUL. WHEN YOU ASK THAT QUESTION, WHEN YOU ASK THAT QUESTION, YOU ARE UNTRUTHFUL. YOU KNOW WHO ELSE IS UNTRUTHFUL ? HIS AIDES AND WISEMAN WAS UNTRUTHFUL AND GOT CAUGHT JUST LIKE WITH ARTHUR ANDERSEN, HE LOST THE SUPREME COURT 9-0. HIS AIDES WERE VERY UNTRUTHFUL AND THEY PUT MUELLER, NOT AT ALL, THEY PUT MUELLER IN A VERY BAD POSITION. HIS AIDES WOULD HAVE BEEN IN VERY BAD POSITION. IF YOU ARE EVER TRUTHFUL, YOU COULD WRITE THAT. >> Reporter: HAVE YOU CALLED FORTH — >> HI, EVERYONE. I AM ELAINE QUIJANO. YOU HERE PRESIDENT TRUMP CRITICIZED FORMER ROBERT MUELLER FOLLOWING HIS SIX HOURS OF TESTIMONY ON CAPITOL HILL. LET'S BRING IT KIM WEHLE, REBECCA ROIPHE B, ED O'KEEFE AND MAJOR GARRETT. REBECCA IS A CBSN LEGAL CONTRIBUTOR AND FORMER DISTRICT ATTORNEY IN NEW YORK COUNTY. ED IS THE CBS NEWS POLITICAL CORRESPONDENT AND MAJOR IS CBS NEWS CHIEF WASHINGTON CORRESPONDENT. MAJOR, LET'S BEGIN WITH YOU. WE HEARD THE PRESIDENT, FAIR TO SAY HE WAS HAPPY WITH HOW REPUBLICAN LAWMAKERS HANDLED THE HEARINGS TODAY. >> QUINTESSENTIAL PRESIDENT TRUMP BRANDON, TERRIBLE DAY FOR DEMOCRATS, TERRIBLE DAY FOR ROBERT MUELLER, NONE OF THE THINGS BROUGHT FORTH IN THE COURSE OF THE HEARING HAVE ANY VALIDITY OR RATIONALITY OR POLITICAL CONSEQUENCES FOR HIM. THAT IS HIS BRANDING EFFORT, HIS SIGNAL TO THE COUNTRY AND THAT IS HIS FRAMING OF WHAT HAPPENED TODAY AND AS SOMEONE WHO PAYS A CLOSE BIT OF ATTENTION TO POLITICAL PERFORMANCE, HE WAS A SHARP AND UNRELENTING CRITIC OF THE PERFORMANCE OF ROBERT MUELLER, NOT THE UNDERLYING DOCUMENT ITSELF HE HAS PROBLEMS WITH THAT. AND ON THE PERFORMANCE SCALE, I THINK DEMOCRATS WOULD CONCEDE ROBERT MUELLER AS A SPECIAL COUNSEL DID WRITE A CONFERENCE OF REPORT BUT DID NOT IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM A COMPELLING OR STAR WITNESS FOR THEM TO BRING THAT REPORT TO LIFE, WHICH WAS THERE ON THE RECORD DESCRIPTION OF WHAT TODAY'S HEARING WAS PARTIALLY ABOUT. IF DEMOCRATS WANTED THIS TO BE A SEARING MOMENT OF GREAT NATIONAL DRAMA WHERE ROBERT MUELLER WOULD GIVE VOICE, ACTION AND PASSION TO THE REPORT, WHICH HE AND HIS TEAM PRODUCED, THEY WERE SORELY MISTAKEN AND PROBABLY DISAPPOINTED. >> ED O'KEEFE, YOU ARE STANDING BY FOR WHAT WE EXPECT TO BE AT ANY MOMENT NOW, HOUSE SPEAKER NANCY PELOSI APPEARING ALONGSIDE THE CHAIRS OF THOSE TWO COMMITTEES WHERE THE HEARINGS WERE HELD. ANY INKLING AS TO WHAT THE MESSAGE MAYBE NOW? >> NO, WE DON'T KNOW. WE WILL BE HEARING FROM HER SHORTLY FROM RIGHT HERE. WHAT SHE DECIDES TO TELL US IN REGARDS TO HOW TODAY WENT AND WHETHER SHE NOW PERHAPS JOINS HER 91 COLLEAGUES WHO ARE FOR IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY OR IMPEACHMENT OR SIGNALS SHE IS KEEPING AN OPEN MIND TO IT AND REALIZES PERHAPS WHAT WAS PRESENTED TODAY IS MORE URGENT EVIDENCE CONGRESS NEEDS TO MOVE THAT DIRECTION. WE HAVE TO WAIT AND SEE. THE GENERAL VIBE IS THE AFTERNOON WENT BETTER THAN THE MORNING. MOSTLY THANKS TO THE QUESTIONS ASKED BY MEMBERS OF THE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE, WHO WERE FAR MORE DIRECT AND ABLE TO EXTRACT A LITTLE MORE INFORMATION FROM MUELLER. HE SPENT THE MORNING STRUGGLING NOT ONLY TO HEAR WHAT LAWMAKERS WERE ASKING HIM BUT ALSO STRUGGLED TO COMPREHEND SOME OF THE QUESTIONS BECAUSE THEY WERE SO SPECIFIC TO CERTAIN ASPECTS OF THE INVESTIGATION. BUT, YOU KNOW, DEMOCRATS HAVE BEEN CLAMORING FOR TODAY FOR QUITE SOME TIME AND ONE AIDE PUT IT TO ME EARLIER, THERE WAS NO SMOKING GUN, JUST AFFIRMATION OF THEIR POSITION ON THINGS, THERE IS EVIDENCE PERHAPS THE PRESIDENT OBSTRUCTED JUSTICE, ONE DAY AS A PRIVATE CITIZEN HE MAY ONE DAY FACE CHARGES. BEYOND THAT, NOTHING EXPLOSIVE AND NOTHING IS COMPELLING IS MICHAEL COHEN'S TESTIMONY, JAMES COMEY'S TESTIMONY ARE SOME OF THE OTHER DEVELOPMENTS IN THIS YEAR'S LONG INVESTIGATION. >> KIM, LET ME ASK YOU BASED ON WHAT WE HEARD OVER THE COURSE OF THOSE SIX HOURS FROM DIRECTOR MUELLER, WAS ANYTHING REVEALED THAT WAS PERHAPS NOT KNOWN BEFORE TODAY REGARDING EITHER OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE OR RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE? >> I THINK SOMETHINGS WERE CLARIFIED. I DON'T THINK REALLY THE STORY TODAY IS HOW ROBERT MUELLER PERFORMED BUT RATHER WHAT IS ACTUALLY IN THE REPORT AND WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWED. HE DID CLARIFY AND REITERATE WHAT IS IN THE REPORT, UNFORTUNATELY ATTORNEY GENERAL BARR DISTORTED, THAT IS WHEN HE SAID HE WAS NOT EXONERATED, THERE IS EVIDENCE OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, THERE'S EVIDENCE OF CONSPIRACY YOU DO NOT NEED TO PROVE, HE DISMISSED ROBERT MUELLER TO SHOW OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE. WITH RESPECT TO BOTH CONSPIRACY AND OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, PARTICULAR WITH OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, WHEN THE DEMOCRATS WALKED THROUGH THE LEGAL ELEMENTS, IT IS LIKE A RECIPE, YOU HAVE TO SHOW A NUMBER OF THINGS. WHEN THEY WALK THROUGH THE THINGS, WITH RESPECT TO EACH PIECE OF EVIDENCE, THE REPUBLICANS DID NOT RESPOND TO THE EVIDENCE. THEY DID NOT TRY TO UNDERMINE THE SUBSTANTIVE CLAIM, THE FACTS ESSENTIALLY. THIS IS NOT A POINT OF VIEW, THESE ARE FACTS. BUT THIS DOES NOT AMOUNT TO A WHOLE LOT IF NOTHING WILL COME OF IT, IF CONGRESS IS NOT GOING TO IMPEACH. WE HAD THE REPORT, MICHAEL COHEN BLOCKBUSTER TESTIMONY, WE HAVE THIS AND THE PRESIDENT THAT GETS ON THE BULLY PULPIT AND IS COVERED AND DENIES REALITY AND THAT BECOMES THE NARRATIVE. UNFORTUNATELY, WE ARE MOVING TOWARD A GOVERNMENT, A PRESIDENCY AFTER THIS THAT IS NOT ACCOUNTABLE, IT WILL NOT BE DONALD TRUMP FOREVER BUT THE NEXT PERSON THAT COMES IN THE OFFICE WILL BE IN POSITION TO VIOLATE NORMS, POTENTIALLY COMMIT CRIMES AND HAVE IT BE A BIG SHRUG. THAT IS A PROBLEM FOR DEMOCRACY FOR THE YEARS FORWARD, NOT JUST WITH RESPECT TO THIS MOMENT. >> REBECCA, I WANT TO ASK SOMETHING, WE HEARD THE PRESIDENT SAY OVER AND OVER THIS NOTION THAT MUELLER CORRECTED SOME OF HIS TESTIMONY, WHICH HE DID. HE ISSUED A CORRECTION TO HIS MORNING TESTIMONY, THIS WAS HIS OPENING STATEMENT IN THE AFTERNOON BEFORE THE HOUSE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE. LET'S FIRST LISTEN TO WHAT BOB MUELLER TOLD CONGRESSMAN TED LOU AND HIS CORRECTION. >> TO RECAP WHAT WE HAVE HEARD, WE HEARD TODAY THE PRESIDENT ORDERED FORMER WHITE HOUSE COUNSEL DON McGHAN TO FIRE YOU. THE PRESIDENT ORDERED DON McGHAN TO COVER THAT UP AND CREATE A FALSE PAPER TRAIL. NOW WE HEARD THE PRESIDENT ORDERED — JEFF SESSIONS TO LIMIT YOUR INVESTIGATION SO THAT YOU STOP INVESTIGATING THE PRESIDENT. I BELIEVE A REASONABLE PERSON LOOKING AT THESE FACTS COULD CONCLUDE ALL THREE ELEMENTS ARE THE CRIME OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE HAVE BEEN MET. I WOULD LIKE TO ASK YOU, THE REASON AGAIN YOU DID NOT INDICT DONALD TRUMP IS BECAUSE OF OLC OPINION SAYING YOU CANNOT INDICT A SITTING PRESIDENT, CORRECT? BEFORE WEGO TO QUESTIONS, I WANT TO ADD ONE CORRECTION TO MY TESTIMONY THIS MORNING, I WANT TO GO BACK TO ONE THING SAID THIS MORNING BY MR. LEIU YOU SAID AND I QUOTE YOU DID NOT CHARGE THE PRESIDENT BECAUSE OF THE OLC OPINION". THAT IS NOT THE CORRECT WAY TO SAY IT, AS I SAID IN THE REPORT AND AT THE OPENING, WE DID NOT REACH A DETERMINATION AS TO WHETHER THE PRESIDENT COMMITTED A CRIME. >> ALL RIGHT, OLC, OFFICE OF THE LEGAL COUNSEL WITHIN THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. REBECCA, REMIND US WHAT THIS OLC OPINION WAS AND WHY DID BOB MUELLER FEEL THE NEED TO MAKE THAT CORRECTION? >> THE OPINION SAYS YOU CANNOT INDICT A SITTING PRESIDENT. %-ú BECAUSE TO SAY SOMEBODY HAS COMMITTED A CRIME, WHEN THAT PERSON CANNOT THEN GO INTO COURT AND DEFEND THEMSELVES IS PROBLEMATIC FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF PROSECUTORIAL TRADITION. HE WOULD NEVER DO THAT. I THINK THE NUANCE HE WAS CORRECTING WAS THAT HE DID SAY IN THE REPORT, WE JUST NEVER REACHED THAT QUESTION. HIS INITIAL ANSWERS SOUNDED LIKE THAT IS THE ONLY REASON. WE DEFINITELY WOULD HAVE CHARGED HIM IF IT WEREN'T FOR THAT. HE DOES NOT WANT TO SAY THAT FOR OBVIOUS REASONS, IF YOU MAKE A DETERMINATION NOT TO CHARGE SOMEBODY, YOU CAN'T SAY BY THE WAY, HE REALLY COMMITTED A CRIME OTHERWISE YOU HAVE UNDERMINED THE PURPOSE OF THAT INITIAL DECISION NOT TO CHARGE. >> SO, THERE WAS AN INTERESTING MOMENT, CONGRESSMAN SEAN MALONEY OF NEW YORK ASKED BOB MUELLER WHY HE DID NOT SUBPOENA THE PRESIDENT FOR A SITDOWN INTERVIEW. LET'S LISTEN TO SOME OF THAT. >> DID YOU HAVE SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE OF THE PRESIDENT'S INTENT TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE AND IS THAT WHY YOU DID NOT DO THE INTERVIEW? >> THERE'S A BALANCE, ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO SATISFY THAT LAST ELEMENT, HOW MUCH TIME ARE YOU WILLING TO SPEND IN THE COURTS LITIGATING THE INTERVIEW WITH THE PRESIDENT. >> IN THIS CASE, YOU FELT YOU HAVE ENOUGH EVIDENCE FOR THE PRESIDENT'S INTENT. >> WE HAD TO MAKE A DAB OF BALANCED DECISION BASED ON HOW MUCH EVIDENCE WE HAD COMPARED TO THE LENGTH OF TIME IT WOULD TAKE. >> BECAUSE YOU HAD LIMITED TIME, IF YOU GAVE IT TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OR THIS CONGRESS, THERE WAS SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE IT WAS BETTER THAN THAT DELAY. >> CAN YOU STATE THAT AGAIN? >> IT WAS BETTER THAN THE DELAY TIP PRESIDENT SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE OF THE PRESIDENT OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND THIS COMMITTEE. THAT'S WHY YOU DIDN'T DO THE INTERVIEW. >> WE DIDN'T DO THE INTERVIEW BECAUSE OF THE LENGTH OF TIME IT WOULD TAKE TO RESOLVE THE ISSUES ATTENDING TO THAT. >> KIM, WHAT YOU MAKE OF THE SPECIAL COUNSEL'S REASONING NOT TO SUBPOENA PRESIDENT TRUMP FOR FACE-TO-FACE INTERVIEW, ABOUT NOT WANTING TO DRAG OUT THE RUSSIAN PROBE? >> WELL, I MEAN, WE ARE FOCUSED ON WHAT MR. MUELLER HIMSELF BELIEVED WAS SUFFICIENT TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE. ALL THE EVIDENCE AS SUGGESTED BEFORE IS THERE, ALL IN THE REPORT. PEOPLE, SPECIFICALLY CONGRESS, CAN MAKE THEIR OWN DETERMINATION, THAT IS WHAT HE WAS REFERRING TO. THE NEXT STEP HE WAS ALLUDING TO WOULD BE POSSIBLE IMPEACHMENT. I THINK THAT EXCHANGE THERE WAS ESSENTIALLY HIM SAYING, LISTEN, ORIGINALLY WE BELIEVED AND IT IS IN THE REPORT, AN INTERVIEW OF MR. TRUMP WAS "VITAL" AND EVENTUALLY BECAME NOT SO VITAL. WE ACCUMULATED ADDITIONAL INTENT TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE AND AT SOME POINT WE PUT THE EVIDENCE OF OBSTRUCT JUSTICE ON ONE SIDE OF THE SCALE AND THE DELAY, THE PROBLEMS OF DELAY IF WE DO SUBPOENA HIM ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE SCALE, WE DECIDED THE DELAY WAS NOT WORTH IT. WE HAVE DONE ENOUGH. HE DID NOT GO SO FAR TO SAY THERE WAS SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO CHARGE OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE AS HE MENTIONED, HE WAS VERY CLEAR HE DID NOT WANT TO DO THAT, THAT WAS A DECISION MADE A LONG TIME AGO. HE SAID IF WE SUBPOENAED HIM, IT WOULD TAKE ADDITIONAL MONTHS THAT WOULD HAVE DRAGGED OUT THE INVESTIGAION AND WE DECIDED WE HAD ENOUGH FOR THE NEXT STEP, THOSE ARE MY WORDS, ESSENTIALLY TO HAND IT OFF TO THE POLITICAL PROCESS, WHICH BY VIRTUE OF THE OLC MEMO, THE INTERNAL MEMO, POLICY MEMO SAYING YOU CANNOT INDICT A PRESIDENT IS THE ONLY WAY STRUCTURALLY TO HOLD ANY PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES POTENTIALLY ACCOUNTABLE FOR WRONGDOING. IF THE CONGRESS CANNOT DO IT, THEN WE HAVE AN UNACCOUNTABLE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENCY, NOT JUST TRUMP. THAT IS THE ISSUE. >> A REMINDER, WE ARE WAITING AT ANY MOMENT FOR HOUSE SPEAKER NANCY PELOSI TO APPEAR IN THE ROOM WHERE ED IS STANDING BY FOR HER REACTION AFTER THESE MUELLER HEARINGS. MAJOR, LET ME ASK YOU, THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN PUT OUT A STATEMENT THE SUFFERIG SITE IN PART, THESE HEARINGS WERE A DISASTER FOR DEMOCRATS AND ROBERT MUELLER CONFIRMED WHAT WE ALREADY KNEW, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION. THE WAY PRESIDENT TRUMP HAS BEEN TREATED IS UNPRECEDENTED., TO YOU EXPECT TO HEAR THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN TALK ABOUT ROBERT MUELLER NOW THAT THE HEARINGS ARE OVER? >> THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN WILL USE WHAT WAS ESTABLISHED TODAY IN PART TO BUTTRESS THEIR CASE. NO EVIDENCE OF A CONSPIRACY WORTH CHARGING IN A CRIMINAL COURT AND NO DECISION ON OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, FOR THEM, THEY WILL SHORTEN THAT, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, GAME OVER. SET AND MATCH TO PRESIDENT TRUMP. WHAT WAS CURIOUS THOUGH, ELAINE, WHATEVER THE CAMPAIGN SAYS WILL BE TO BENEFIT THE REELECTION PROSPECTS OF THE PRESIDENT. WE KNOW THAT'S A GIVEN. WHAT REELECTION CAMPAIGNS SAY IN A FEVERED POLITICAL MOMENT IS TO BE PREDICTED, IT WILL BE IN THE BENEFIT AND HOPE THAT THE CANDIDATE. WHAT WAS INTERESTING TO ME TODAY, AS DEMOCRATS ASKED ALL THE QUESTIONS ABOUT CONDUCT THAT LOOKED AND SOUNDED OBSTRUCTIVE, IF NOT MIGHT HAVE BEEN IN TERMS OF THE SHARP LETTER OF THE LAW OR ON QUESTIONS ABOUT CONTACTS WITH THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN AND RUSSIANS, LIES ABOUT THOSE CONTACTS TO COVER THEM UP. THOSE ARE ALL VERY SERIOUS ISSUES AND THEY SPEAK TO THIS ISSUE, WHAT IS THE NEW NORMAL IN AMERICAN POLITICS? ARE ANY OF THESE BEHAVIORS ACCEPTABLE IN AMERICAN POLITICS AT THE HIGHEST LEVELS, WHICH IS OF COURSE THE PRESIDENT'S OF THE UNITED STATES. THE REPUBLICANS ALL OPPORTUNITIES TO POKE HOLES IN THOSE ASSERTIONS, EITHER OBSTRUCTIVE BEHAVIOR OR CONTACT WITH RUSSIA, ALTHOUGH MAY NOT HAVE BEEN CRIMINAL CERTAINLY DO NOT REPRESENT ANY KIND OF NORMAL CONDUCT WE HAVE SEEN BEFORE AND THEN LYING ABOUT THOSE CONTACTS TO COVER THEM UP AND CONTACTS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. THEY NEVER MOUNTED A CASE THEY WERE NOT ACCEPTABLE OR THOSE ASSERTIONS WERE INVALID. THEY ESSENTIALLY LET THEM GO INTO THE RECORD UNCHALLENGED. WHAT DOES THAT TELL YOU? IS POLITICAL ACTORS, REPUBLICANS DID NOT TRY TO MOUNT A DEFENSE ABOUT OBSTRUCTIVE BEHAVIOR OR CONTACT WITH THE RUSSIANS. ALL THEY SAID WAS THE PRESIDENT IS NOT CRIMINALLY LIABLE. ESSENTIALLY ASSERTING ON BEHALF OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY UNEARNED DONALD TRUMP THAT IS THE NEW STANDARD. NOT PROPER OR HISTORIC, NOT NORMS ACCEPTED ACROSS PARTY LINES OVER MORE THAN TWO CENTURIES. IT IS JUST NOT CRIMINAL. IF THAT IS A STANDARD THEY'RE WILLING TO LIVE WITH, THAT IS A STANDARD THE REPUBLICAN PARTY I THIS ERA AND GOING FOR WILL HAVE TO LIVE WITH. >> REBECCA, I WANT YOU TO WEIGH IN WITH YOUR LEGAL EAR AND RESPOND TO WHAT WE HEARD MAJOR SPELL OUT AND THE FACT EPUBLICANS DID NOT ATTEMPT DISPUTE THE ARGUMENTS THE DEMOCRATS WERE MAKING, CONTAINED WITHIN THE REPORT ITSELF. THESE INSTANCES OF OBSTRUCTION. >> RIGHT. I THINK THAT IS A REALLY GOOD POINT. PROSECUTORS OFTEN SAY AMONGST OURSELVES, WHEN PROSECUTORS HAVE A REALLY GOOD TASTE, DEFENSE ATTORNEYS TEND TO DISTRACT, POINT OUT THERE'S SOMETHING CORRUPT ABOUT THIS GOVERNMENT, CORRUPT ABOUT THIS INVESTIGATION. THEY TRIED TO MAKE THE JURY LOOK SOMEWHERE ELSE OTHER THAN THE EVIDENCE. THEY CAN BE VERY SUCCESSFUL. I THINK THAT IS WHAT THIS TACTIC WAS, RATHER THAN TO SAY NO, THIS IS NOT TRUE. THEY NEVER DID THAT. SO, I DON'T KNOW. IN A NORMAL JURY, USUALLY AS A PROSECUTOR YOU WIN, YOU HAVE THE FACTS AND THEY ARE DISTRACTING, YOU HAVE THEM RUNNING. THEN YOU ARE FINE. NOWHERE DID WE EVER HEAR REPUBLICANS ATTEMPT TO CHALLENGE. >> RIGHT, EXACTLY. THAT'S THE POINT, IF YOU WIN ON THE FACTS, PROSECUTOR IN A NORMAL COURTROOM, YOU USUALLY GET A CONVICTION, AT THE END, GUYS, ALL THAT MATTERS IS THE FACTS, THIS OTHER STUFF IS DISTRACTION. WITH YOUR, WE PUT UP POLITICAL DISCOURSE, IT IS A PRETTY GOOD DISTRACTION. THEY DID A GOOD JOB, THESE TALKING POINTS THAT MADE PEOPLE THINK, THIS WAS A WITCHHUNT. SO MUCH MONEY SPENT. >> QUESTIONING THE MOTIVES OF THE INVESTIGATORS. >> AND ECHOING PRESIDENT TRUMP'S WITCHHUNT STORY AND THE STEEL DOSSIER AND ALL THAT, IT IS NOT UNSUCCESSFUL BECAUSE YOU DON'T HAVE A JUDGE SAYING GUYS, DON'T PAY ATTENTION TO THIS. THAT DOESN'T MATTER. WHAT MATTERS IS THE FACTS HERE. I DON'T KNOW, I SAY THE DEMOCRATS WIN ON THE FACTS, THE DEMOCRATS, THE REPUBLICANS MAY WIN ON THE RHETORIC. THE RHETORIC MAY BE MORE IMPORTANT THAN THE FACTS WHEN IT COMES DOWN TO IT. >> VERY DIFFERENT CRITERIA WHEN JUDGING THE COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION. >> ED, YOU ARE AWAITING HOUSE SPEAKER NANCY PELOSI AND THOSE DEMOCRATIC CHAIRMAN. WHERE DOES ALL OF THIS ACTUALLY LEAVE MEMBERS OF CONGRESS NOW? AS THEY TRY TO CONTINUE THEIR OWN INVESTIGATIONS KNOWING WHAT WE SAW TAKE PLACE TODAY AND HOW REPUBLICANS ARE CHARACTERIZING IT, HOW THE PRESIDENT HIMSELF IS CHARACTERIZING AND WHAT YOU HEAR FROM DEMOCRATS AT THIS MOMENT. >> I THINK THEY ARE WAITING TO GET SIGNALS FROM THE THREE THAT WILL SPEAK WITH YOU SHORTLY. THEY'RE COMING CLOSER TO THE BOTTOM OF THE HOUR. YOU KNOW, WE HAVE ASKED DEMOCRATS TODAY COMING OUT OF THAT HEARING, WHAT NEXT, WHAT HAPPENS NEXT? YOU HEARD CHAIRMANSHIPS AT THE END OF HIS HEARING OUTLINE THE DIFFERENT LINES OF INQUIRY THE PRESIDENT, THE DEMOCRATS ARE PURSUING FOR THE PRESIDENT FINANCES AND FORMER TIES TO ENMITIES WITH THE ADMINISTRATION ITSELF. THAT HAS BEEN ONE OF THE THINGS WITH SPEAKER PELOSI, WHEN SHE HAS IMPATIENCE FROM FELLOW DEMOCRATS OR GETS ASKED HER OWN THOUGHTS ON IMPEACHMENT PROCESS. THERE ARE METHODICAL PROCESS IS UNDERWAY IN SEVERAL COMMITTEES AND IT WILL CONTINUE. THE QUESTION IS, WHEN THEY GO HOME AT THE END OF THIS WEEK TO BEGIN THE SUMMER RECESS, DO THEY HEAR FROM CONSTITUENTS AT ALL ABOUT WHETHER OR NOT THEY SHOULD CONTINUE THIS OR DROP IT. IT WILL DEPEND ON WHAT CORNER OF THE COUNTRY THEY GO BACK TO, THE MOST DEMOCRATIC DISTRICTS OF COURSE. THIS IS BEING SLOW WALKED IN THE SWING DISTRICTS, THE DEMOCRATS WON LAST YEAR, YOU ASK CONSTITUENTS, WHAT ABOUT THE LEGISLATION ON HEALTHCARE AND EDUCATION AND THE ECONOMY, WHAT IS UP WITH THAT? YOU KNOW, WHAT WILL BE INTERESTING HERE IS WHETHER THE SPEAKER HERSELF SIGNALS HER OWN VIEWS ON WHAT HAPPENED TODAY, WHETHER SHE'S ANY CLOSER TO PERHAPS REALIZING THIS IS INEVITABLE, OR SHE THROWS CAUTION TO THE WIND AND INSISTS THIS WILL BE A SLOW METHODICAL PROCESS THAT CONTINUES INTO THE FALL. >> FOR SOME FOLKS, THE CENTRAL QUESTION REMAINS, IS THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY ANY CLOSER OR ARE THEY FURTHER WAY NOW FROM THE PROSPECT OF EITHER OPENING AN IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY OR PURSUING IMPEACHMENT ITSELF? >> RIGHT. YOU KNOW, AS MUELLER WAS TESTIFYING IN WASHINGTON TODAY, YOU HAD EIGHT PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES AT NAACP FORUM, VOICING THEIR SUPPORT TO INVESTIGATE AND POSSIBLE IMPEACHMENT. AMONG OTHERS, JOE BIDEN SAID IT HAS TO BE METHODICAL. CORY BOOKER REINFORCING HIS VIEWS, IMPEACHMENT SHOULD BE UNDERWAY. KIRSTEN GILLIBRAND AND ELIZABETH WARREN SAY THIS AND WILL CONTINUE TO SAY THIS. AND WITH CONGRESS NOT IN SESSION DURING THE MONTH OF AUGUST, IF THERE ARE DEMOCRATS CONTINUING TO PUSH FOR THIS, IT MAY PUT PRESSURE ON LAWMAKERS WHEN THEY GET BACK. THEY, LIKE OTHER DEMOCRATS NO, IMPEACHMENT IS ONLY ONE ISSUE THEY SHOULD AND WILL TALK ABOUT, THERE'S MORE CONCERN WHEN YOU LOOK AT POLLING, OPINIONS OF MOST AMERICANS, THEY ARE NOT FOR IMPEACHMENT AND SOME POLLING SAYS, THE MUELLER REPORT IS OVER, TIME TO MOVE ON. >> MAJOR, I WONDER FROM YOUR CONVERSATIONS WITH TRUMP CAMPAIGN OFFICIALS, DO THEY SEE A POLITICAL BENEFIT TO JUST THIS SPECTER OF IMPEACHMENT, THE LONGER IT CONTINUES TO SORT OF HANGOVER THIS POLITICAL LANDSCAPE? >> I DON'T KNOW IF THEY WOULD SAY IT IS A POLITICAL BENEFIT. WHEN I ASKED BRAD PARSCALE, THE CAMPAIGN MANAGER, IF HE WAS HOPING THE DEMOCRATS WOULD GO TOWARD IMPEACHMENT. HE SAID NO, IT'S A TERRIBLE THING, NOT GOOD FOR THE COUNTRY. I DON'T WANT THEM TO DO THIS. I THINK THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN AND THOSE AROUND THE PRESIDENT ARE MUCH HAPPIER WITH THE SENSE OF PARALYSIS THE DEMOCRATS HAVE ABOUT THIS QUESTION. I THINK THEY LOOK AT THAT AND SAY, WHEN THE PRESIDENT SAYS THE DEMOCRATS ARE IN DISARRAY, THEY ARE DISASTER, THEY CAN'T DO ANYTHING, HE IS IN PART IDENTIFYING THIS EXISTENTIAL QUESTION FOR DEMOCRATS, WHAT DO WE DO IN THIS MOMENT? IT HAS BEEN THE QUESTION THAT WRAPPED ITSELF AROUND THE MUELLER REPORT SINCE IT BECAME A PUBLIC DOCUMENT. WHAT DO YOU DO? WHEN ROBERT MUELLER GAVE HIS SHORT STATEMENT AT THE END OF MAY, HE SAID THERE'S A CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS BY WHICH TO HANDLE THIS INFORMATION, THAT WAS AS CLEAR SIGNAL HE COULD EVER GIVE, THE CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS IS ONE INVESTED IN THE HOUSE OF INVEST REPRESENTATIVES AND IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY. HE WOULD NOT TALK ABOUT IMPEACHMENT TODAY, HE WOULD NOT SPEAK THE WORD, HE IS AGAIN TRYING TO SAY I'M THE INVESTIGATOR, I ASSEMBLED THIS BODY OF EVIDENCE. IT IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, WHICH IS DEMOCRATIC-CONTROLLED, TO DECIDE WHAT TO DO WITH IT OR NOT DO WITH IT. THAT QUESTION HAS NEVER REALLY ESCAPED HOUSE DEMOCRATS SINCE THE REPORT BECAME A PUBLIC DOCUMENT. WHAT HAS ESCAPED THEM IS A RESOLUTION TO THAT QUESTION. WHAT WILL YOU DO? THOSE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES ED O'KEEFE MENTIONED, ESPECIALLY ELIZABETH WARREN, LEAVE THE RESULT IS NOT THE POINT. WHETHER OR NOT HE IS IMPEACHED AND WHETHER THE SENATE TRIES AND CONVEX. THAT IS NOT THE POINT, HER POINT IS, ASK THE QUESTION. HAVE EVERYONE TAKE A VOTE ON WHETHER THIS BEHAVIOR IS OR IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE HISTORICAL DEFINITION OF HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS. THAT PROCESS ITSELF WILL CLARIFY NOT ONLY THIS PERIOD OF TIME BUT FOR ALL TIME, AT LEAST FOR THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE IF THIS CONDUCT DOES OR DOES NOT REACH THAT STANDARD. THAT IS A QUESTION ELIZABETH WARREN AND INCREASING NUMBER OF DEMOCRATS SEEKING THE PARTY NOMINATION AT LEAST WANT TO HAVE ASKED AND ANSWERED IN PUBLIC. THAT IS WHY THEY SUPPORT IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY. NOT NECESSARILY TO CONVICT THE PRESIDENT BUT PUT THE QUESTION SQUARELY BEFORE EVERYONE INVOLVED IN THIS PROCESS. >> CAITLIN, LET ME TURN YOU, I WANT TO TALK ABOUT AN EXCHANGE THE PRESIDENT HAD LEAVING THE SOUTH LAWN WITH PAULA REID, THE CBS NEWS WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENT. PAULA ASKED THE PRESIDENT, SHE SAID MUELLER SAID YOU COULD BE CHARGED ONCE YOU LEAVE OFFICE. THE PRESIDENT SAID NO, HE DID NOT SAY THAT. HE WENT ON TO CALL PAULA FAKE NEWS. IN ESSENCE SAID THAT IS NOT WHAT MUELLER SAID. CAN YOU CLARIFY FOR US WHAT IT IS WE ACTUALLY HEARD BOB MUELLER SAY? BEFORE YOUR YOU REACT, I'M TOLD WE HAVE THAT SOUND. LET'S PLAY THAT. >> HE DID NOT SAY THAT. AGAIN, YOU ARE FAKE NEWS AND YOU ARE RIGHT AT THE TOP OF THE LIST. LET ME TELL YOU, GO BACK TO IT, IT IS NOT WHAT HE SAID. READ HIS CORRECTION. READ HIS CORRECTION. IF YOU READ HIS CORRECTION, YOU WILL FIND OUT. THAT IS WHY PEOPLE DON'T DEAL WITH YOU BECAUSE YOU ARE NOT AN HONEST REPORTER. >> ALL RIGHT. WE SHOULD KNOW OF COURSE, WE TALKED ABOUT THAT CORRECTION A MOMENT AGO AND IT DID NOT HAVE TO DO WITH THE QUESTION PAUL ASKED. CAN YOU CLARIFY FOR US, KIM, WHAT IS IT ROBERT MUELLER SAID , THE POINT PAULA ASKED ABOUT, THE PRESIDENT COULD BE CHARGED ONCE HE LEAVES OFFICE. >> MY RECOLLECTION IT WAS UNEQUIVOCAL YES. THE RECORD WILL SPEAK FOR ITSELF ON THAT. I CAN ALSO SAY AS A LAWYER HAVING READ THE LOC OPINION AND THE OPINIONS PRIOR TO IT, BOTH THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION, NIXON ADMINISTRATION, THE DEPENDENT COUNCILS BUT DISAGREED WITH THAT OUTCOME, THE CURRENT OLC OPINION DOES NOT SAY A PRESIDENT AS A PRIVATE CITIZEN COULD NOT BE CHARGED WITH CRIMES COMMITTED IN OFFICE. THE QUESTION COMES DOWN TO A STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS, CERTAIN CRIMES HAVE BASICALLY END DATES. YOU CANNOT CHARGE THEM AFTER THAT. THE GENERAL FEDERAL ONE IS 5 YEARS. IF MR. TRUMP GETS A SECOND TERM IN OFFICE, EIGHT YEARS, A DEMOCRATIC, PRESUMABLY ADMINISTRATION WOULD NOT BE ABLE POTENTIALLY TO BRING THOSE CHARGES. BUT IF HE IS OUT OF OFFICE IN FOUR YEARS, THOSE PROSECUTORS COULD TAKE THAT 448 PAGE BOOK AND ALL THE UNDERLYING EVIDENCE, BRING IT TO A GRAND JURY AND THE GRAND JURY COULD MAKE A DETERMINATION WHETHER TO INDICT MR. TRUMP AS A PRIVATE CITIZEN. BUT I THINK ANOTHER REALLY IMPORTANT THING THAT CAME OUT OF THE DAY, THAT WAS MENTIONED EARLIER IN TERMS OF OTHER SUBSTANTIVE LEGISLATION VOTERS SHOULD CARE ABOUT, IT WAS A RARE MOMENT OF BIPARTISANSHIP. REPUBLICANS ASKING MR. MUELLER, SHOULD WE BE WORRIED ABOUT RUSSIANS ATTACKING THE ELECTORAL PROCESS? HE SAID ABSOLUTELY, EVERY AMERICAN SHOULD WORRY ABOUT THAT. OTHER COUNTRIES THAT DON'T LIKE US ARE LEARNING FROM THE RUSSIAN ANTICS AND MANEUVERS. HE SAID IMMEDIATELY, THIS CONGRESS SHOULD TAKE A LEGISLATION AT A MINIMUM TO REQUIRE THE VARIOUS INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES TO SHARE INFORMATION SO THEY CAN FIGURE OUT HOW TO KEEP OUR ELECTORAL PROCESS SAFE. AT THE END OF THE DAY, IT DOESN'T REALLY MATTER WHAT THE SHIPS ON THE TITANIC ARE DOING, THE POLITICIANS IF THE SHIP ITSELF GOES DOWN. OUR ENTIRE DEMOCRACY IS HINGES, WHEN WE GO TO THE BALLOT BOOTH, OUR VOTE COUNTS, WE CAST OUR OWN VIEW ON WHO SHOULD BE PRESIDENT AND CONGRESS. WE ARE CAREENING TO A SITUATION WHERE THAT IS NOT WHAT IS HAPPENING. I HOPE ONE THING TAKEN OUT OF THIS IS A BIPARTISAN EFFORT TO PROTECT ALL AMERICANS RIGHT TO VOTE, REPUBLICANS, DEMOCRATS, INDEPENDENTS, THAT I THINK WAS A BRIGHT LIGHT IN THE SECOND HALF OF THE DAY THAT WAS BIPARTISAN. BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE. IT IS UNFORTUNATE MR. TRUMP CALL THE WHOLE THING A HOAX. IT IS NOT, IT IS QUITE SERIOUS AND SOMETHING MR. MUELLER PRICKLY SAID WE SHOULD ALL BE CONCERNED ABOUT. >> TO FOLLOWING KIM'S POINT, I BELIEVE IT WAS WILL HURD, THE REPUBLICAN FROM TEXAS EXPRESSING A GREAT DEAL OF CONCERN ABOUT THE 2020 ELECTION. I'M WONDERING WHAT IT IS IN CONVERSATIONS YOU HAVE HAD WITH LAWMAKERS GIVEN THE FACT THERE IS A LOT CONSTANTLY TAKING PLACE WITH VARIOUS INVESTIGATIONS AND OTHER MATTERS. BUT THIS QUESTION OF SECURING THE 2020 ELECTION, IS THAT SOMETHING YOU HAVE HEARD A LOT FROM LAWMAKERS ABOUT? >> OH, YEAH BECAUSE THERE ARE SEVERAL DIFFERENT PROPOSALS TO BOLSTER ELECTION SECURITY THAT ARE SITTING DORMANT. MOSTLY ON THE SENATE SIDE, IF YOU HAVE COME OUT OF THE HOUSE, REPUBLICANS SO FAR AT LEAST, AS PART OF THEIR BLANKET DECISION NOT TO REALLY TAKE UP SIGNIFICANT LEGISLATION BUT FOCUS SOLELY ON CONFIRMATIONS HAVE CONTINUED TO IGNORE NOT ONLY DEMOCRATIC PROPOSALS BUT BIPARTISAN PROPOSAL IS SITTING THERE WAITING TO ADDRESS SOME OF THE CONCERNS ABOUT POTENTIAL INTERFERENCE FROM FOREIGN ACTORS AND PROVIDE MORE RESOURCES TO MUNICIPALITIES AS THEY PREPARE FOR NEXT YEAR'S ELECTION. IT IS ABSOLUTELY TOP OF MIND CONCERN, ONE OF THE ISSUES PELOSI TOLD HER CAUCUS TO TALK NEXT FEW WEEKS, DEMOCRATS HAVE TRIED TO ADVANCE LEGISLATION THAT WOULD BOLSTER ELECTION SECURITY AND IT IS BEING BLOCKED BY REPUBLICANS IN THE SENATE. IT IS DEFINITELY A CONCERN, YOU KNOW, MUELLER WAS MAKING THE POINT TODAY, THIS IS SOMETHING THE COUNTRY SHOULD FOCUS ON. MEMBERS OF BOTH PARTIES HEARD THAT. HURD IS ONE OF THEM, OTHER DEMOCRATS AS WELL. IT IS JUST NOT MOVING PARTLY BECAUSE THERE'S SOME CONCERN, SOME UNCERTAINTY ABOUT WHETHER THE PRESIDENT HIMSELF WOULD EVEN SUPPORT ANY OF THAT KIND OF LEGISLATION, ANYTHING TO DO SO WOULD BE TO CONCEDE HE IS NOT ENTIRELY CONCEITED REGARDING FOREIGN INTERFERENCE IN THE 2016 ELECTIONS. >> REBECCA, LET ME ASK YOU, THIS IDEA OF INTERFERENCE IN THE 2020 ELECTION, YOU HEARD ED TALK ABOUT VARIOUS EFFORTS. IN THE MEANTIME, PEOPLE WITHIN THOSE AGENCIES ARE STILL TASKED WITH TRYING TO PURSUE AND INVESTIGATE WHAT COULD BE TAKING PLACE IN THE RUN UP TO NOVEMBER OF NEXT YEAR. CAN YOU GIVE US A SENSE OF WHAT THE ATMOSPHERE MIGHT BE LIKE, DOES THIS KIND OF POLITICAL DISCOURSE TAKING PLACE NOW, THE QUESTIONING OF PEOPLE LIKE ROBERT MUELLER, THE QUESTIONING OF THE MOTIVES OF JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OFFICIALS, THAT BEING VERY PUBLIC, DOES THAT HAVE AN EFFECT ON CURRENT INVESTIGATORS DO YOU THINK? >> I ACTUALLY THINK IT DOESN'T. I THINK MOST PEOPLE ARE CAREER OFFICIALS AND THEY SEE THEIR JOB AS YOU AND I SEE, WE COME TO WORK AND DO HER THING. THEY THINK THIS IS AN IMPORTANT THING. AS ROBERT MUELLER SAID, PART OF WHAT HE DID IN THIS HEARING AND PART OF WHEN HE BECOMES ANIMATED, HE SAID LEAVE ME OUT OF THE POLITICAL FRAY. WHEN YOU START TALKING ABOUT ATTACKING INSTITUTIONS, I WILL JUMP IN AND TRY TO MAKE YOU LISTEN. THIS IS A VERY SERIOUS ASSAULT, IF THIS IS THE NEW NORMAL, OUR CONCERN IS THE NEW NORMAL, YOU CAN WELCOMED THE ASSAULTS, ENCOURAGE THEM, WE ARE IN TROUBLE AND WE HAVE TO STOP THAT. I THINK PEOPLE HERE THAT, THEY WILL LISTEN TO THAT AND CONTINUE TO DO THAT WITH THE NEW URGENCY OF PROTECTING AMERICA WHEN THE POLITICAL PROCESS DOES NOT WORK WELL. >> THIS IS KIND OF SPECTACLE THOUGH. DOESN'T HAVE AN EFFECT ON EVEN THE MOST EXPERIENCED CAREER PROSECUTORS, CAREER JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OFFICIALS, CAREER FBI INVESTIGATORS? >> YEAH, I WOULD LIKE TO SAY NO, IT'S IMPOSSIBLE IT DOES NOT HAVE SOME EFFECT AT ALL. EVEN THE SMALL MOMENT COME A THE ONE THING WE LEARNED TODAY WE DID NOT KNOW WAS WHY MUELLER DID NOT SUBPOENA THE PRESIDENT. I THOUGHT THAT WAS A PRETTY INTERESTING PIECE OF INFORMATION. A NORMAL PROSECUTION, YOU WOULD CROSS THE T AND THOUGHT THAT I, HERE THEY MADE THAT BALANCING DECISION, I DON'T THINK HE DID IT ON PURPOSE, PART OF THE BALANCE SO MUCH PRESSURE COMING DOWN, SO MANY ALLEGATIONS OF CORRUPTION. >> THE INVESTIGATIONS, THEY NEED TO WRAP IT UP QUICKLY. >> MAYBE THAT WAS A BLESSING FOR THE AMERCAN PUBLIC. HEART OF THE REASON WHY IS BECAUSE THERE'S SO MUCH RHETORIC ABOUT HOW LEGITIMATE THIS THING IS. HE WANTED TO FINISH, GET THE FACTS OUT AND GET IT DONE. TO ME, THAT WAS A LITTLE LAMPS, THE FIRST TIME I'VE EVER SEEN MUELLER MAY HAVE BEEN SLIGHTLY AFFECTED BY THE POLITICAL THEATER GOING ON OUTSIDE. THE ANSWER TO YOUR QUESTION, YES OF COURSE, NO ONE IS TOTALLY IMMUNE TO THAT. I DON'T THINK IN THE END, IT WILL CHANGE WHAT PEOPLE DO IN A SOME DIRECTIVE THAT COMES DOWN. THEY WILL DO WHAT THEY ARE GOING TO DO. I THINK IT IS IMPOSSIBLE PEOPLE DON'T HEAR. >> MAJOR, AS WE'VE BEEN SPEAKING, I WONDER IF WE HAVE BEEN HEARING FROM TRUMP OFFICIALS INSIDE OR OUTSIDE OF THE WHITE HOUSE OR IN THE CAMPAIGN ABOUT HOW WE HEARD THE PRESIDENT HIMSELF A SHORT TIME AGO ON THE SOUTH LAWN, HOW THE PRESIDENT IS REACTING AWAY FROM THE CAMERAS TO WHAT WE HEARD FROM ROBERT MUELLER. >> THAT IS AN INTERESTING QUESTION AND I THINK IT APPLIES PARTICULARLY TO THE PRESIDENT'S MISTREATMENT OF PAULA REID. SHE ASKED A STRAIGHTFORWARD QUESTION. THE PRESIDENT BELLIGERENTLY ATTACKED HER WITH A SET OF FACTS THAT HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH THE UNDERLYING QUESTION SHE ASKED. LET ME GIVE YOU INSIGHT INTO HOW I THINK THE PRESIDENT LANDED THERE. THE PRESIDENT WAS TALKING ABOUT THE CORRECTION ROBERT MUELLER ISSUED AT THE TOP OF THE INTELLIGENT COMMITTEE HEARING WHICH WE PLAYED FOR OUR AUDIENCE. ONE OF THE THINGS THOSE IN THE TRUMP LEGAL TEAM, I BELIEVE THOSE CLOSEST TO THE PRESIDENT TOLD HIM TODAY WAS, THAT CORRECTION IS IMPORTANT BECAUSE IT MEANS ROBERT MUELLER DID NOT MAKE A DECISION ON OBSTRUCTION, NOT BECAUSE HE WAS PREVENTED FROM MAKING A DECISION BUT HE DID NOT REACH A CONCLUSION. ONE OF THE THINGS ROBERT MUELLER DIDN'T SAY BUT ALL THE TRUMP LOYALISTS BELIEVE BECAUSE HE CAN READ IT IN THE REPORT, MUELLER AND HIS TEAM DID NOT MAKE A DETERMINATION ON OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE BECAUSE THESE ARE THEIR WORDS, "DIFFICULT QUESTIONS OF FACT AND LAW". SO, THE PRESIDENT LOOKS AT THAT, ALL OF HIS LEGAL TEAM SAYS, MUELLER LEFT THAT OUT. THAT IS ONE OF THE BIG REASONS HE DID NOT REACH A CONCLUSION O■N OBSTRUCTION. HOW DOES THE PRESIDENT INTERPRET THAT IN HIS HEAD? WELL, THOSE QUESTIONS, DIFFICULT OF FACT AND LAW WILL ALWAYS EXIST, I WILL NEVER BE CHARGED, IT DOES NOT MATTER IF I'M IN OFFICE OR NOT, I WILL NOT BE CHARGED AS A PRIVATE CITIZEN BECAUSE THEY CAN'T BECOME A DIFFICULT QUESTIONS OF FACT AND LAW. THE PRESIDENT TAKES A, JUMPS TO THE CORRECTION AND SAYS, YOU SHOULD NOT ASK THAT BECAUSE I COULD NEVER BE CHARGED. I GUARANTEE YOU THAT IS HOW DONALD TRUMP INTERPRETED AND ADDED THOSE THINGS THAT, EVEN THOUGH IN THE MOMENT, PAULA REID'S QUESTION WAS COMPLETELY LEGITIMATE, ON THE FACTS. THE PRESIDENT'S ANSWER WAS NOT BUT I GUARANTEE YOU, HE WINS THE THREE-STEP PROCESS. CORRECTION, DIFFICULT QUESTION OF FACT AND LAW, I WON'T EVER BE CHARGED, THERE YOU GO. AND THAT IS DRAWING HIS OWN CONCLUSION AND MOST IMPORTANTLY, CREATING A FRAMING DEVICE ABOUT HIS INNOCENCE AND BELLIGERENCE ABOUT THE MEDIA, ASKING ABOUT THINGS HE FINDS OUT OF BOUNDS, EVEN THOUGH THEY ARE COMPLETELY WITHIN BOUNDS AND TRYING TO STRETCH THE PARAMETERS OF WHAT IS FACTUAL, WHAT IS TRUTHFUL, WHAT IS SITTING RIGHT IN FRONT OF US TO HIS BENEFIT. >> I WONDER, MAJOR, HEARING YOU SPELL OUT THAT THINKING, IS THIS PERHAPS A LINE WE COULD BE HEARING AT CAMPAIGN RALLIES TO COME? ONE COULD ENVISION THIS CORRECTION NOTION BEING A POINT THE PRESIDENT WOULD WANT TO EMPHASIZE OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN. >> I CAN ENVISION IT, I WON'T PREDICT IT. I'VE GIVEN UP THAT PROCESS WITH THIS PRESIDENT AND HIS RALLIES. >> ED, REMIND OUR VIEWERS WHO HAVE BEEN HEARING ABOUT THIS EVENT THAT IS SUPPOSED TO TAKE PLACE AT ANY MOMENT, HOUSE SPEAKER NANCY PELOSI. WHO WILL BE JOINING HER AT THE PODIUM? WHAT YOU HEAR ABOUT THE TIMING OF THIS? I BELIEVE IT WAS ORIGINALLY SUPPOSED TO TAKE PLACE IN OUR AGO, BEFORE THE PRESIDENT CAME OUT ON THE SOUTH LAWN. >> RIGHT. YOU KNOW, THE SPEAKER, WITH ALL DUE RESPECT, RARELY IS PUNCTUAL WHEN IT COMES TO THIS KIND OF NEWS CONFERENCE, AS ONE OF MY COLLEAGUES WALKS THROUGH THE SHOT. THERE WE GO. WE HAVE NOT BEEN GIVEN AN OFFICIAL SIGNAL AS TO WHEN SHE WILL SHOW UP. SHE WILL BE JOINED WHEN SHE ARRIVES, IF SHE ARRIVES WITH THE CHAIRMAN OF THE JUDICIARY AND INTELLIGENCE ENTITIES, JERRY NADLER AND ADAM SCHIFF, WHO LED TODAY'S DELIBERATIONS, WITH WHOM SHE IS WORKING OUT A LOT OF THE PARTY STRATEGY ON HOW TO PROCEED. THERE WAS A MEETING SHE HELD A LITTLE WHILE AGO, ONE OF HER

Author Since: Mar 11, 2019

  1. TRUMP LANDSLIDE 2020
    MAGA FOREVER 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
    KEEP VOTING DEMS IN YOU RACISTS SLAVES OF THE DEMOCRATIC PLANTATION ¯(ツ)/¯

  2. Democrats only wanted the truth (which we got ) he already said not adding to it just the facts and the facts told the truth !!

  3. Taking my kids this summer on vacation to see the wall being built! They are almost more excited than I am! What a treat it is for America and our American family to be alive in this exciting time. Whenever possible, we instill true blue American values in our American family.

  4. All who have taken it upon themselves to rule over others have incurred hatred and unpopularity for a time; but if one has a great aim to pursue, this burden of envy must be accepted, and it is wise to accept it.
    Pericle

  5. A very long time ago during the years of our ancient yesterdays, lived a very
    famous king who just loved to travel.

    But after many years he decided to return home only to find changed people who had become unhappy.

    They no longer laughed so easily.
    And rarely smiled.

    Parents didn’t take their children to the beaches like before and build sand castles like they used to.
    They had forgotten how to be happy 😄
    But they wanted more and more and more.

    Once upon a time people used to belong to bird watching clubs. Or stamp clubs. Or hiking clubs. All sorts of clubs. Life saving surf clubs. They used to go on long country hikes or fly fish in a quiet babbling brook. They flew kites on Sundays with other kiters. They had picnics too. It was the simple things in life which gave them pleasure. But what happened? Where did that go?

    They have nothing to look forward to my King said a friend of Pericles.
    Now they have seen the entire banquet they cannot enjoy the meal.
    They want it all.
    Not small. But all.

    If they join a bird watching club they might be missing out on something else.
    Therefore they don’t join clubs.

    Oh great King, as a pyramid begins with one great stone upon another, so too do the simple pleasures of life.
    Find one and then look for another.

    We have to give them back their love for each other. In clubs of mutual interest this will be found.

    The King asked if they had lost their first love, the love of God, from whom all blessings flow.

    To which the servant replied.
    That fire doth not burn bright today but tomorrow it will, if God will visit them again.

    To be continued

  6. Russian environmentalist claim the BLUE WATERS IN A SIBERIA LAKE IS NOT dangerous although they warn not to drink it because its full of toxic metals & waste from a power plant. The russian government doesnt want the russian people to drink the toxic water but CLAIM ITS SAFE. THATS the russian republicans telling AMERICANS that crooked Russian puppet trump is NOT TOXIC to our DEMOCRACY. IMPEACH!

  7. CBS is so biased against Trump. They are shills for the Democrats and were devastated by Mueller's humiliating performance

  8. For centuries, Kosovo has been in Serbia. USA do not share our country, but visit and I assure you that it is not as bad as your media is, but it is beautiful country and hospitable. Kosovo is Serbia.

  9. The Lying King! Get on with impeachment! All the crimes he did, any other person would be, in prison. Can't charge a sitting president. He want be president long.

  10. Pericles friend says,

    Those who sow seeds of happiness are like Johnny Appleseed,
    growing apple trees for the weary traveller.

    And those who spread good cheer are the Johnny Appleseed’s of this life.
    Their smiling happiness lifts us and serves us.
    They get us to believe.

  11. As a friend of Pericles I would say this to you.

    Once a captain has been appointed withdraw your opposition.
    The ship he steers has your family on it.

    Wise fathers of families teach their children to be happy.

    Others teach them how to sing and dance .

    Or how to become doctors or dentists or blue collar workers.

    But if a father teaches them to be happy he will have taught them well.

  12. Pericles friend says,

    Those who sow seeds of happiness are like Johnny Appleseed,
    growing apple trees for the weary traveller.

    And those who spread good cheer are Johnny Appleseed’s of this life.
    Their smiling happiness lifts us and serves us.
    They get us to believe.

  13. There is NOTHING that this Godless infidel trump can ever say that contains an ounce of truth credibility honor compassion understanding … why else would this dim whit constantly “clarify” what he says

  14. Lol so no collusion still?😂 I can tell that no democrats read the report or the hearing😂😂👌🏻 the left is hopeless.

  15. I had a dream last night where I was in the 1950s and Trump was a common roadside advertising board selling tobacco to children, with a free ice cream.
    Strange eh?…..
    😀

  16. TRUMP had mueller by the balls because of his past illegalities. Mueller was forced to grovel in public. A sad old crook forced to humiliate himself

  17. I watched the Mueller report and it was a wast if time Mueller didn't know anything in it and after all there is nothing in it Lazy MotherF Mueller wasted all the Tax dollars LAZY F8CK you wasted my time I'll never believe a thing Mueller will ever say from here on ONCE A LAIR ALL WAYS A LAIR

  18. Something is wrong. Even after a decade of propping up the economy with money printed out of thin air, you are begging the Fed to blow the bubble bigger in the midst of the strongest economy ever.

  19. Let’s face it. The current president of the US is an idiot. Blew nearly $1.5 billion. Nearly bankrupt. Bailed out by the Russians who now own him. So it goes…

Related Post